Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders
Abstract Background Shared medical appointments (SMAs) or group consultations have been promoted in primary care to improve workload pressures, resource-use efficiency and patient self-management of long-term conditions (LTCs). However, few studies have explored stakeholders’ perspectives of this no...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Primary Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01790-z |
_version_ | 1818510000173088768 |
---|---|
author | Fiona Graham Helen Martin Jan Lecouturier Amy O’Donnell Mei Yee Tang Katherine Jackson Falko F. Sniehotta Eileen Kaner |
author_facet | Fiona Graham Helen Martin Jan Lecouturier Amy O’Donnell Mei Yee Tang Katherine Jackson Falko F. Sniehotta Eileen Kaner |
author_sort | Fiona Graham |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Shared medical appointments (SMAs) or group consultations have been promoted in primary care to improve workload pressures, resource-use efficiency and patient self-management of long-term conditions (LTCs). However, few studies have explored stakeholders’ perspectives of this novel care delivery model in the English NHS context, particularly patients’ views and experiences of SMAs. Method Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the perspectives of stakeholders (21 patients, 17 primary care staff, 2 commissioners and 2 SMA training providers) with and without SMA experience from a range of geographical and socio-economic backgrounds in the North East and North Cumbrian region of England. Thematic analysis was conducted to examine perceptions around impact on patient care and outcomes and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Results Three main themes were identified: ‘Value of sharing’, ‘Appropriateness of group setting’, ‘Implementation processes’. Patients experiences and perceptions of SMAs were largely positive yet several reported reservations about sharing personal information, particularly in close-knit communities where the risk of breaching confidentiality was perceived to be greater. SMAs were considered by patients and staff to be inappropriate for certain personal conditions or for some patient groups. Staff reported difficulties engaging sufficient numbers of patients to make them viable and having the resources to plan and set them up in practice. Whilst patients and staff anticipated that SMAs could deliver high quality care more efficiently than 1:1 appointments, none of the practices had evaluated the impact SMAs had on patient health outcomes or staff time. Conclusion Stakeholder experiences of SMA use in English primary care are largely similar to those reported in other countries. However, several important cultural barriers were identified in this setting. Further work is needed to better understand how patient and staff perceptions, experiences and engagement with SMAs change with regular use over time. Concerns regarding staff capacity, additional resource requirements and numbers of eligible patients per practice suggest SMAs may only be feasible in some smaller practices if facilitated by primary care networks. Further mixed-method evaluations of SMAs are needed to inform the evidence base regarding the effectiveness, efficiency and feasibility of SMAs long-term and subsequently their wider roll-out in English primary care. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T22:53:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-124735d879594270a4f80f05671218e0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2731-4553 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T22:53:09Z |
publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Primary Care |
spelling | doaj.art-124735d879594270a4f80f05671218e02022-12-22T01:30:21ZengBMCBMC Primary Care2731-45532022-07-0123111310.1186/s12875-022-01790-zShared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholdersFiona Graham0Helen Martin1Jan Lecouturier2Amy O’Donnell3Mei Yee Tang4Katherine Jackson5Falko F. Sniehotta6Eileen Kaner7Policy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson RoadResearch & Evidence Team, NECS, Riverside HousePolicy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson RoadPolicy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson RoadPolicy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson RoadPolicy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson RoadPolicy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson RoadPolicy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson RoadAbstract Background Shared medical appointments (SMAs) or group consultations have been promoted in primary care to improve workload pressures, resource-use efficiency and patient self-management of long-term conditions (LTCs). However, few studies have explored stakeholders’ perspectives of this novel care delivery model in the English NHS context, particularly patients’ views and experiences of SMAs. Method Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the perspectives of stakeholders (21 patients, 17 primary care staff, 2 commissioners and 2 SMA training providers) with and without SMA experience from a range of geographical and socio-economic backgrounds in the North East and North Cumbrian region of England. Thematic analysis was conducted to examine perceptions around impact on patient care and outcomes and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Results Three main themes were identified: ‘Value of sharing’, ‘Appropriateness of group setting’, ‘Implementation processes’. Patients experiences and perceptions of SMAs were largely positive yet several reported reservations about sharing personal information, particularly in close-knit communities where the risk of breaching confidentiality was perceived to be greater. SMAs were considered by patients and staff to be inappropriate for certain personal conditions or for some patient groups. Staff reported difficulties engaging sufficient numbers of patients to make them viable and having the resources to plan and set them up in practice. Whilst patients and staff anticipated that SMAs could deliver high quality care more efficiently than 1:1 appointments, none of the practices had evaluated the impact SMAs had on patient health outcomes or staff time. Conclusion Stakeholder experiences of SMA use in English primary care are largely similar to those reported in other countries. However, several important cultural barriers were identified in this setting. Further work is needed to better understand how patient and staff perceptions, experiences and engagement with SMAs change with regular use over time. Concerns regarding staff capacity, additional resource requirements and numbers of eligible patients per practice suggest SMAs may only be feasible in some smaller practices if facilitated by primary care networks. Further mixed-method evaluations of SMAs are needed to inform the evidence base regarding the effectiveness, efficiency and feasibility of SMAs long-term and subsequently their wider roll-out in English primary care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01790-zShared medical appointmentsGroup consultationsPrimary careGeneral practiceImplementationSemi-structured interviews |
spellingShingle | Fiona Graham Helen Martin Jan Lecouturier Amy O’Donnell Mei Yee Tang Katherine Jackson Falko F. Sniehotta Eileen Kaner Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders BMC Primary Care Shared medical appointments Group consultations Primary care General practice Implementation Semi-structured interviews |
title | Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders |
title_full | Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders |
title_fullStr | Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed | Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders |
title_short | Shared medical appointments in English primary care for long-term conditions: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients, primary care staff and other stakeholders |
title_sort | shared medical appointments in english primary care for long term conditions a qualitative study of the views and experiences of patients primary care staff and other stakeholders |
topic | Shared medical appointments Group consultations Primary care General practice Implementation Semi-structured interviews |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01790-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fionagraham sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders AT helenmartin sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders AT janlecouturier sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders AT amyodonnell sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders AT meiyeetang sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders AT katherinejackson sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders AT falkofsniehotta sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders AT eileenkaner sharedmedicalappointmentsinenglishprimarycareforlongtermconditionsaqualitativestudyoftheviewsandexperiencesofpatientsprimarycarestaffandotherstakeholders |