The Way of Thought and Practice

Preview: /Review: Poul Andersen, The Paradox of Being: Truth, Identity, and Images in Daoism (Leiden, The Netherlands: Harvard University Asia Center, 2019), 362 pages./ Philosophy tends to approach Daoism in degrees. One may be introduced to the Dao de Jing of Laozi and appreciate the poetic st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kevin C. Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2022-10-01
Series:Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Online Access:https://eidos.uw.edu.pl/the-way-of-thought-and-practice/
_version_ 1811308797148266496
author Kevin C. Taylor
author_facet Kevin C. Taylor
author_sort Kevin C. Taylor
collection DOAJ
description Preview: /Review: Poul Andersen, The Paradox of Being: Truth, Identity, and Images in Daoism (Leiden, The Netherlands: Harvard University Asia Center, 2019), 362 pages./ Philosophy tends to approach Daoism in degrees. One may be introduced to the Dao de Jing of Laozi and appreciate the poetic structure and appreciate the virtues of non-coercive action. When one next encounters the writings of Zhuangzi, one is struck by the difference in style, the humor, and often the difficulty in penetrating the meaning of many passages. This is frequently contrasted with Confucian philosophy. The vocabulary, upon first examination appears similar but upon further reading one discovers that not only do these traditions use shared terminology in different way but that their views of reality is stark. This is much more so with the French existentialists and yet Poul Andersen finds sympathetic understanding between Daoism and “philosophies of existence” with regards to the concept of being. Those familiar with the Dao de Jing can probably cite passages that Andersen will address as it is unmistakable in Daoism that being is said to come from and depend on non-being. The existentialist tradition has meditated on questions of being and so Andersen’s aim is to undertake an exploration of being in Daoism informed by existentialist methodology. This review seeks to emphasize the case studies Andersen utilizes in his research. While his methodological approach is informed by existentialist philosophers, his decades of research in Chinese religions provides much of the substance throughout.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:29:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-12480df3a58f4164833c7be4e44b6b11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2544-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:29:40Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher University of Warsaw
record_format Article
series Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
spelling doaj.art-12480df3a58f4164833c7be4e44b6b112022-12-22T02:52:17ZengUniversity of WarsawEidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture2544-302X2022-10-0162929710.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0019The Way of Thought and PracticeKevin C. Taylor0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-4956Department of Philosophy, University of MemphisPreview: /Review: Poul Andersen, The Paradox of Being: Truth, Identity, and Images in Daoism (Leiden, The Netherlands: Harvard University Asia Center, 2019), 362 pages./ Philosophy tends to approach Daoism in degrees. One may be introduced to the Dao de Jing of Laozi and appreciate the poetic structure and appreciate the virtues of non-coercive action. When one next encounters the writings of Zhuangzi, one is struck by the difference in style, the humor, and often the difficulty in penetrating the meaning of many passages. This is frequently contrasted with Confucian philosophy. The vocabulary, upon first examination appears similar but upon further reading one discovers that not only do these traditions use shared terminology in different way but that their views of reality is stark. This is much more so with the French existentialists and yet Poul Andersen finds sympathetic understanding between Daoism and “philosophies of existence” with regards to the concept of being. Those familiar with the Dao de Jing can probably cite passages that Andersen will address as it is unmistakable in Daoism that being is said to come from and depend on non-being. The existentialist tradition has meditated on questions of being and so Andersen’s aim is to undertake an exploration of being in Daoism informed by existentialist methodology. This review seeks to emphasize the case studies Andersen utilizes in his research. While his methodological approach is informed by existentialist philosophers, his decades of research in Chinese religions provides much of the substance throughout.https://eidos.uw.edu.pl/the-way-of-thought-and-practice/
spellingShingle Kevin C. Taylor
The Way of Thought and Practice
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
title The Way of Thought and Practice
title_full The Way of Thought and Practice
title_fullStr The Way of Thought and Practice
title_full_unstemmed The Way of Thought and Practice
title_short The Way of Thought and Practice
title_sort way of thought and practice
url https://eidos.uw.edu.pl/the-way-of-thought-and-practice/
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinctaylor thewayofthoughtandpractice
AT kevinctaylor wayofthoughtandpractice