How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases

Debates about the concept of disease have traditionally been framed as a competition between two conflicting approaches: naturalism, on the one hand, and normativism or social constructivism, on the other. In this article, we lay the groundwork for a naturalistic form of social constructivism by (1)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brandon A. Conley, Shane N. Glackin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2021-04-01
Series:Philosophy of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/18
_version_ 1818474978785361920
author Brandon A. Conley
Shane N. Glackin
author_facet Brandon A. Conley
Shane N. Glackin
author_sort Brandon A. Conley
collection DOAJ
description Debates about the concept of disease have traditionally been framed as a competition between two conflicting approaches: naturalism, on the one hand, and normativism or social constructivism, on the other. In this article, we lay the groundwork for a naturalistic form of social constructivism by (1) dissociating the presumed link between value-free conceptions of disease and a broadly naturalistic approach; (2) offering a naturalistic argument for a form of social constructivism; and (3) suggesting avenues that strike us as especially promising for filling in the details of an alternative approach and addressing the most obvious objections.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T04:44:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1258614a628f405d884a35ba0257b5ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2692-3963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T04:44:14Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format Article
series Philosophy of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-1258614a628f405d884a35ba0257b5ed2022-12-22T02:11:31ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghPhilosophy of Medicine2692-39632021-04-012110.5195/pom.2021.1818How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about DiseasesBrandon A. Conley0Shane N. Glackin1Department of Philosophy, Colgate UniversityDepartment of Sociology, Philosophy, and Anthropology, University of ExeterDebates about the concept of disease have traditionally been framed as a competition between two conflicting approaches: naturalism, on the one hand, and normativism or social constructivism, on the other. In this article, we lay the groundwork for a naturalistic form of social constructivism by (1) dissociating the presumed link between value-free conceptions of disease and a broadly naturalistic approach; (2) offering a naturalistic argument for a form of social constructivism; and (3) suggesting avenues that strike us as especially promising for filling in the details of an alternative approach and addressing the most obvious objections.https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/18diseasedysfunctionnormativismnaturalismsocial constructivism
spellingShingle Brandon A. Conley
Shane N. Glackin
How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases
Philosophy of Medicine
disease
dysfunction
normativism
naturalism
social constructivism
title How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases
title_full How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases
title_fullStr How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases
title_full_unstemmed How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases
title_short How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases
title_sort how to be a naturalist and a social constructivist about diseases
topic disease
dysfunction
normativism
naturalism
social constructivism
url https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/18
work_keys_str_mv AT brandonaconley howtobeanaturalistandasocialconstructivistaboutdiseases
AT shanenglackin howtobeanaturalistandasocialconstructivistaboutdiseases