How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases
Debates about the concept of disease have traditionally been framed as a competition between two conflicting approaches: naturalism, on the one hand, and normativism or social constructivism, on the other. In this article, we lay the groundwork for a naturalistic form of social constructivism by (1)...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Philosophy of Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/18 |
_version_ | 1818474978785361920 |
---|---|
author | Brandon A. Conley Shane N. Glackin |
author_facet | Brandon A. Conley Shane N. Glackin |
author_sort | Brandon A. Conley |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Debates about the concept of disease have traditionally been framed as a competition between two conflicting approaches: naturalism, on the one hand, and normativism or social constructivism, on the other. In this article, we lay the groundwork for a naturalistic form of social constructivism by (1) dissociating the presumed link between value-free conceptions of disease and a broadly naturalistic approach; (2) offering a naturalistic argument for a form of social constructivism; and (3) suggesting avenues that strike us as especially promising for filling in the details of an alternative approach and addressing the most obvious objections. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:44:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1258614a628f405d884a35ba0257b5ed |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2692-3963 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:44:14Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
record_format | Article |
series | Philosophy of Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-1258614a628f405d884a35ba0257b5ed2022-12-22T02:11:31ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghPhilosophy of Medicine2692-39632021-04-012110.5195/pom.2021.1818How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about DiseasesBrandon A. Conley0Shane N. Glackin1Department of Philosophy, Colgate UniversityDepartment of Sociology, Philosophy, and Anthropology, University of ExeterDebates about the concept of disease have traditionally been framed as a competition between two conflicting approaches: naturalism, on the one hand, and normativism or social constructivism, on the other. In this article, we lay the groundwork for a naturalistic form of social constructivism by (1) dissociating the presumed link between value-free conceptions of disease and a broadly naturalistic approach; (2) offering a naturalistic argument for a form of social constructivism; and (3) suggesting avenues that strike us as especially promising for filling in the details of an alternative approach and addressing the most obvious objections.https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/18diseasedysfunctionnormativismnaturalismsocial constructivism |
spellingShingle | Brandon A. Conley Shane N. Glackin How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases Philosophy of Medicine disease dysfunction normativism naturalism social constructivism |
title | How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases |
title_full | How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases |
title_fullStr | How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases |
title_short | How to Be a Naturalist and a Social Constructivist about Diseases |
title_sort | how to be a naturalist and a social constructivist about diseases |
topic | disease dysfunction normativism naturalism social constructivism |
url | https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brandonaconley howtobeanaturalistandasocialconstructivistaboutdiseases AT shanenglackin howtobeanaturalistandasocialconstructivistaboutdiseases |