Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms

Microtomography can measure the X-ray attenuation coefficient in a 3-D volume of snow with a spatial resolution of a few microns. In order to extract quantitative characteristics of the microstructure, such as the specific surface area (SSA), from these data, the greyscale image first needs to be se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Hagenmuller, M. Matzl, G. Chambon, M. Schneebeli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-05-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf
_version_ 1818944098878357504
author P. Hagenmuller
M. Matzl
G. Chambon
M. Schneebeli
author_facet P. Hagenmuller
M. Matzl
G. Chambon
M. Schneebeli
author_sort P. Hagenmuller
collection DOAJ
description Microtomography can measure the X-ray attenuation coefficient in a 3-D volume of snow with a spatial resolution of a few microns. In order to extract quantitative characteristics of the microstructure, such as the specific surface area (SSA), from these data, the greyscale image first needs to be segmented into a binary image of ice and air. Different numerical algorithms can then be used to compute the surface area of the binary image. In this paper, we report on the effect of commonly used segmentation and surface area computation techniques on the evaluation of density and specific surface area. The evaluation is based on a set of 38 X-ray tomographies of different snow samples without impregnation, scanned with an effective voxel size of 10 and 18 μm. We found that different surface area computation methods can induce relative variations up to 5 % in the density and SSA values. Regarding segmentation, similar results were obtained by sequential and energy-based approaches, provided the associated parameters were correctly chosen. The voxel size also appears to affect the values of density and SSA, but because images with the higher resolution also show the higher noise level, it was not possible to draw a definitive conclusion on this effect of resolution.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:37:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:37:50Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj.art-126533b3133548f09daf4fcf3be4c16b2022-12-21T19:48:14ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242016-05-011031039105410.5194/tc-10-1039-2016Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithmsP. Hagenmuller0M. Matzl1G. Chambon2M. Schneebeli3Météo-France – CNRS, CNRM-GAME, UMR3589, CEN, 1441 rue de la piscine, 38400 Saint Martin d'Hères, FranceWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Fluelastrasse 11, 7260 Davos Dorf, SwitzerlandUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Irstea, UR ETGR, 2 rue de la Papeterie – BP 76, 38402 Saint Martin d'Hères, FranceWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Fluelastrasse 11, 7260 Davos Dorf, SwitzerlandMicrotomography can measure the X-ray attenuation coefficient in a 3-D volume of snow with a spatial resolution of a few microns. In order to extract quantitative characteristics of the microstructure, such as the specific surface area (SSA), from these data, the greyscale image first needs to be segmented into a binary image of ice and air. Different numerical algorithms can then be used to compute the surface area of the binary image. In this paper, we report on the effect of commonly used segmentation and surface area computation techniques on the evaluation of density and specific surface area. The evaluation is based on a set of 38 X-ray tomographies of different snow samples without impregnation, scanned with an effective voxel size of 10 and 18 μm. We found that different surface area computation methods can induce relative variations up to 5 % in the density and SSA values. Regarding segmentation, similar results were obtained by sequential and energy-based approaches, provided the associated parameters were correctly chosen. The voxel size also appears to affect the values of density and SSA, but because images with the higher resolution also show the higher noise level, it was not possible to draw a definitive conclusion on this effect of resolution.http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf
spellingShingle P. Hagenmuller
M. Matzl
G. Chambon
M. Schneebeli
Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
The Cryosphere
title Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_full Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_fullStr Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_short Sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
title_sort sensitivity of snow density and specific surface area measured by microtomography to different image processing algorithms
url http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/1039/2016/tc-10-1039-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT phagenmuller sensitivityofsnowdensityandspecificsurfaceareameasuredbymicrotomographytodifferentimageprocessingalgorithms
AT mmatzl sensitivityofsnowdensityandspecificsurfaceareameasuredbymicrotomographytodifferentimageprocessingalgorithms
AT gchambon sensitivityofsnowdensityandspecificsurfaceareameasuredbymicrotomographytodifferentimageprocessingalgorithms
AT mschneebeli sensitivityofsnowdensityandspecificsurfaceareameasuredbymicrotomographytodifferentimageprocessingalgorithms