Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomes
Re-interventions after pulmonary autograft aortic valve replacement (Ross procedure) may be associated with dysfunction of the neoaortic, neopulmonary, or both operated valves. Late dysfunction, other than infective endocarditis, is associated with underlying conditions, technical errors, and unsuit...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I.Shumakov
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1321 |
| _version_ | 1797871909613862912 |
|---|---|
| author | R. M. Muratov M. I. Fedoseykina D. A. Titov D. V. Britikov G. A. Khugaev |
| author_facet | R. M. Muratov M. I. Fedoseykina D. A. Titov D. V. Britikov G. A. Khugaev |
| author_sort | R. M. Muratov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Re-interventions after pulmonary autograft aortic valve replacement (Ross procedure) may be associated with dysfunction of the neoaortic, neopulmonary, or both operated valves. Late dysfunction, other than infective endocarditis, is associated with underlying conditions, technical errors, and unsuitable pulmonary trunk replacement materials. Re-interventions are technically complex, while tactical approaches have not been definitively formulated. Objective: to analyze re-interventions in patients after Ross procedure, technical approaches and immediate outcomes. Material and methods. Between 2001 and 2019, 14 patients were reoperated upon within 2 days to 21 years after primary Ross procedure. Early prosthetic endocarditis (2) and technical errors (1) were the reasons for early postoperative re-intervention. Neoaortic valve insufficiency (7), including pulmonary valve dysfunction (2), pulmonary valve degeneration (2), pulmonary prosthetic valve endocarditis (1), aortic, pulmonary and mitral valve endocarditis (1) were the reasons for late postoperative re-intervention. Based on the lesion volume, neoaortic valve replacement (3), neoaortic root replacement (6), including pulmonary valve/trunk replacement (8), and pulmonary trunk stenting (2) were performed. Results. In-hospital mortality was 7.1%. One patient died of early endocarditis after primary procedure. The postoperative period for the remaining patients was uneventful. Microscopic examination of the neoaorta revealed fragmentation of elastic fibers and rearrangement of tissue histoarchitectonics. In the pulmonary position, the aortic allograft and stentless xenograft had severe calcification and valve stenosis. Conclusions. Neoaortic valve insufficiency associated with cusp prolapse and neoaortic root dilatation may be the reasons for re-interventions after the Ross procedure. The second reason for re-interventions is valve graft dysfunction in the pulmonary trunk position. Elective reoperations on the neoaortic root and/or lung graft, despite the large volume, can be performed with low mortality and morbidity. Aortic allografts and xenografts for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is unjustified due to early and more severe dysfunction compared to pulmonary allograft. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:51:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-126a0f713827409d91d9aa7b3eb7b79f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1995-1191 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:51:33Z |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I.Shumakov |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov |
| spelling | doaj.art-126a0f713827409d91d9aa7b3eb7b79f2023-03-13T10:37:27ZrusFederal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I.ShumakovVestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov1995-11912021-04-0123110111110.15825/1995-1191-2021-1-101-111962Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomesR. M. Muratov0M. I. Fedoseykina1D. A. Titov2D. V. Britikov3G. A. Khugaev4Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular SurgeryBakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular SurgeryBakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular SurgeryBakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular SurgeryBakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular SurgeryRe-interventions after pulmonary autograft aortic valve replacement (Ross procedure) may be associated with dysfunction of the neoaortic, neopulmonary, or both operated valves. Late dysfunction, other than infective endocarditis, is associated with underlying conditions, technical errors, and unsuitable pulmonary trunk replacement materials. Re-interventions are technically complex, while tactical approaches have not been definitively formulated. Objective: to analyze re-interventions in patients after Ross procedure, technical approaches and immediate outcomes. Material and methods. Between 2001 and 2019, 14 patients were reoperated upon within 2 days to 21 years after primary Ross procedure. Early prosthetic endocarditis (2) and technical errors (1) were the reasons for early postoperative re-intervention. Neoaortic valve insufficiency (7), including pulmonary valve dysfunction (2), pulmonary valve degeneration (2), pulmonary prosthetic valve endocarditis (1), aortic, pulmonary and mitral valve endocarditis (1) were the reasons for late postoperative re-intervention. Based on the lesion volume, neoaortic valve replacement (3), neoaortic root replacement (6), including pulmonary valve/trunk replacement (8), and pulmonary trunk stenting (2) were performed. Results. In-hospital mortality was 7.1%. One patient died of early endocarditis after primary procedure. The postoperative period for the remaining patients was uneventful. Microscopic examination of the neoaorta revealed fragmentation of elastic fibers and rearrangement of tissue histoarchitectonics. In the pulmonary position, the aortic allograft and stentless xenograft had severe calcification and valve stenosis. Conclusions. Neoaortic valve insufficiency associated with cusp prolapse and neoaortic root dilatation may be the reasons for re-interventions after the Ross procedure. The second reason for re-interventions is valve graft dysfunction in the pulmonary trunk position. Elective reoperations on the neoaortic root and/or lung graft, despite the large volume, can be performed with low mortality and morbidity. Aortic allografts and xenografts for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is unjustified due to early and more severe dysfunction compared to pulmonary allograft.https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1321ross procedureautograftallograftaortic valvereoperation |
| spellingShingle | R. M. Muratov M. I. Fedoseykina D. A. Titov D. V. Britikov G. A. Khugaev Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomes Vestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov ross procedure autograft allograft aortic valve reoperation |
| title | Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomes |
| title_full | Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomes |
| title_fullStr | Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomes |
| title_short | Re-interventions after the Ross procedure: reasons, technical approaches, immediate outcomes |
| title_sort | re interventions after the ross procedure reasons technical approaches immediate outcomes |
| topic | ross procedure autograft allograft aortic valve reoperation |
| url | https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1321 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rmmuratov reinterventionsaftertherossprocedurereasonstechnicalapproachesimmediateoutcomes AT mifedoseykina reinterventionsaftertherossprocedurereasonstechnicalapproachesimmediateoutcomes AT datitov reinterventionsaftertherossprocedurereasonstechnicalapproachesimmediateoutcomes AT dvbritikov reinterventionsaftertherossprocedurereasonstechnicalapproachesimmediateoutcomes AT gakhugaev reinterventionsaftertherossprocedurereasonstechnicalapproachesimmediateoutcomes |