Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial

Aims: To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Methods: This was a preliminary, pragma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah K. James, Giles T. R. Pattison, James Griffin, Joanne D. Fisher, Damian R. Griffin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-08-01
Series:Bone & Joint Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0143.R1
_version_ 1797672269524238336
author Hannah K. James
Giles T. R. Pattison
James Griffin
Joanne D. Fisher
Damian R. Griffin
author_facet Hannah K. James
Giles T. R. Pattison
James Griffin
Joanne D. Fisher
Damian R. Griffin
author_sort Hannah K. James
collection DOAJ
description Aims: To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Methods: This was a preliminary, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled trial in nine secondary and tertiary NHS hospitals in England. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Overall, 40 trainees in the West Midlands were eligible: 33 agreed to take part and were randomized, five withdrew after randomization, 13 were allocated cadaveric training, and 15 were allocated standard training. The intervention was an additional two-day cadaveric simulation course. The control group received standard on-the-job training. Primary outcome was implant position on the postoperative radiograph: tip-apex distance (mm) (DHS) and leg length discrepancy (mm) (hemiarthroplasty). Secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative complication rate, and 12-month mortality. Procedure-specific secondary outcomes were intraoperative radiation dose (for DHS) and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (hemiarthroplasty). Results: Eight female (29%) and 20 male trainees (71%), mean age 29.4 years, performed 317 DHS operations and 243 hemiarthroplasties during ten months of follow-up. Primary analysis was a random effect model with surgeon-level fixed effects of patient condition, patient age, and surgeon experience, with a random intercept for surgeon. Under the intention-to-treat principle, for hemiarthroplasty there was better implant position in favour of cadaveric training, measured by leg length discrepancy ≤ 10 mm (odds ratio (OR) 4.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 14.22); p = 0.027). There were significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions required in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty by cadaveric-trained compared to standard-trained surgeons (OR 6.00 (95% CI 1.83 to 19.69); p = 0.003). For DHS, there was no significant between-group difference in implant position as measured by tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm (OR 6.47 (95% CI 0.97 to 43.05); p = 0.053). No between-group differences were observed for any secondary clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Trainees randomized to additional cadaveric training performed hip fracture fixation with better implant positioning and fewer postoperative blood transfusions in hemiarthroplasty. This effect, which was previously unknown, may be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):602–611.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:27:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-126c1a76c91b4ae7be6049416bb3026e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2633-1462
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:27:31Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format Article
series Bone & Joint Open
spelling doaj.art-126c1a76c91b4ae7be6049416bb3026e2023-09-27T15:00:36ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Open2633-14622023-08-014860261110.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0143.R1Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trialHannah K. James0Giles T. R. Pattison1James Griffin2Joanne D. Fisher3Damian R. Griffin4Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UKDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UKWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UKWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UKDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UKAims: To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Methods: This was a preliminary, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled trial in nine secondary and tertiary NHS hospitals in England. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Overall, 40 trainees in the West Midlands were eligible: 33 agreed to take part and were randomized, five withdrew after randomization, 13 were allocated cadaveric training, and 15 were allocated standard training. The intervention was an additional two-day cadaveric simulation course. The control group received standard on-the-job training. Primary outcome was implant position on the postoperative radiograph: tip-apex distance (mm) (DHS) and leg length discrepancy (mm) (hemiarthroplasty). Secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative complication rate, and 12-month mortality. Procedure-specific secondary outcomes were intraoperative radiation dose (for DHS) and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (hemiarthroplasty). Results: Eight female (29%) and 20 male trainees (71%), mean age 29.4 years, performed 317 DHS operations and 243 hemiarthroplasties during ten months of follow-up. Primary analysis was a random effect model with surgeon-level fixed effects of patient condition, patient age, and surgeon experience, with a random intercept for surgeon. Under the intention-to-treat principle, for hemiarthroplasty there was better implant position in favour of cadaveric training, measured by leg length discrepancy ≤ 10 mm (odds ratio (OR) 4.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 14.22); p = 0.027). There were significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions required in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty by cadaveric-trained compared to standard-trained surgeons (OR 6.00 (95% CI 1.83 to 19.69); p = 0.003). For DHS, there was no significant between-group difference in implant position as measured by tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm (OR 6.47 (95% CI 0.97 to 43.05); p = 0.053). No between-group differences were observed for any secondary clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Trainees randomized to additional cadaveric training performed hip fracture fixation with better implant positioning and fewer postoperative blood transfusions in hemiarthroplasty. This effect, which was previously unknown, may be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):602–611.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0143.R1simulationeducationtraininghip fracturehip fracture surgeryhemiarthroplastiesblood transfusionsrandomized controlled trialleg length discrepancydynamic hip screw (dhs)postoperative complicationsmulticentre randomized controlled trialhip fracture fixations
spellingShingle Hannah K. James
Giles T. R. Pattison
James Griffin
Joanne D. Fisher
Damian R. Griffin
Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial
Bone & Joint Open
simulation
education
training
hip fracture
hip fracture surgery
hemiarthroplasties
blood transfusions
randomized controlled trial
leg length discrepancy
dynamic hip screw (dhs)
postoperative complications
multicentre randomized controlled trial
hip fracture fixations
title Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_short Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_sort hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation trained versus standard trained orthopaedic trainees a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial
topic simulation
education
training
hip fracture
hip fracture surgery
hemiarthroplasties
blood transfusions
randomized controlled trial
leg length discrepancy
dynamic hip screw (dhs)
postoperative complications
multicentre randomized controlled trial
hip fracture fixations
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0143.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahkjames hipfracturesurgeryperformedbycadavericsimulationtrainedversusstandardtrainedorthopaedictraineesapreliminarymulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gilestrpattison hipfracturesurgeryperformedbycadavericsimulationtrainedversusstandardtrainedorthopaedictraineesapreliminarymulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jamesgriffin hipfracturesurgeryperformedbycadavericsimulationtrainedversusstandardtrainedorthopaedictraineesapreliminarymulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT joannedfisher hipfracturesurgeryperformedbycadavericsimulationtrainedversusstandardtrainedorthopaedictraineesapreliminarymulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT damianrgriffin hipfracturesurgeryperformedbycadavericsimulationtrainedversusstandardtrainedorthopaedictraineesapreliminarymulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial