Supreme Judgecraft - Non-Refoulement and the end of the UK-Rwanda ‘deal’?
In R (on the application of AAA (Syria) and others) the UK Supreme Court held that the Secretary of State’s policy to remove protection seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. Rwanda is not, at present, a safe third country. There are, the Supreme Court found, “substantial grounds for believing that there i...
Main Authors: | Catherine Briddick, Cathryn Costello |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/supreme-judgecraft/ |
Similar Items
-
Defeat in the Supreme Court - Where Next for UK Asylum Policy?
by: Alice Donald, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Magical Thinking and Obsessive Desires - Conservative Politics, Human Rights, and the Rwanda Judgment
by: David Owen
Published: (2023-11-01) -
When Treaties are Forbidden
by: Catherine Briddick
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Offshoring Asylum the Italian Way - No Model for Others to Follow
by: Lorenzo Piccoli
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Educational reconstruction in Rwanda
by: Anna Obura
Published: (2005-01-01)