Comparison the Effects of Two Low-Dose Intravenous Sedation Methods on Anxiety Control during Dental Implant Surgery
Background: Control of patient anxiety during dental procedure, makes better operating conditions and reduces medical complications in patients. Intravenous conscious sedation is a good method for patient control during dental surgery. This study aimed to compare the effects of two methods of low-do...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
2014-07-01
|
| Series: | مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/3422 |
| Summary: | Background: Control of patient anxiety during dental procedure, makes better operating conditions and reduces medical complications in patients. Intravenous conscious sedation is a good method for patient control during dental surgery. This study aimed to compare the effects of two methods of low-dose intravenous sedation regimes for patient control in dental implant surgery.
Methods:, 30 patients candidate for dental implant surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Before the surgery, low intravenous doses of combinations of midazolam/fentanylin and midazolam/ketamine were administered for the two group. Sedation score and operation condition in both groups were evaluated and recorded. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney statistical test.
Findings: In midazolam/ketamine group, 86.7% and in midazolam/fentanyl group, 80.0% of patients had appropriate sedation. Good operation condition was observed in 73.3% and 80.0% of the patients in midazolam/ketamine and midazolam/fentanyl groups, respectively. There were not any significant differences between the two groups in sedation score and operation conditions.
Conclusion: Both evaluated drug regimens can provide good sedation score in over than 80% of patients and good operation condition in over than 70% of patients. So, both drug combinations are useful for patients in implant surgery. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1027-7595 1735-854X |