Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment

ABSTRACT According to the fallibilist, it is possible for us to know things when our evidence doesn't entail that our beliefs are correct. Even if there is some chance that we're mistaken about p, we might still know that p is true. Fallibilists will tell you that an important virtue of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clayton Littlejohn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Series:Manuscrito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452017000400031&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818639899748728832
author Clayton Littlejohn
author_facet Clayton Littlejohn
author_sort Clayton Littlejohn
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT According to the fallibilist, it is possible for us to know things when our evidence doesn't entail that our beliefs are correct. Even if there is some chance that we're mistaken about p, we might still know that p is true. Fallibilists will tell you that an important virtue of their view is that infallibilism leads to skepticism. In this paper, we'll see that fallibilist impurism has considerable skeptical consequences of its own. We've missed this because we've focused our attention on the high-stakes cases that they discuss in trying to motivate their impurism about knowledge. We'll see this once we think about the fallibilist impurist's treatment of low-stakes cases. […] when error would be especially disastrous, few possibilities are properly ignored (Lewis 1996: 556, n. 12).
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:02:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1287e66b80ea4466b92615108581aa6b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2317-630X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:02:43Z
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Manuscrito
spelling doaj.art-1287e66b80ea4466b92615108581aa6b2022-12-21T22:12:39ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X404313810.1590/0100-6045.2017.v40n4.clS0100-60452017000400031Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic EncroachmentClayton LittlejohnABSTRACT According to the fallibilist, it is possible for us to know things when our evidence doesn't entail that our beliefs are correct. Even if there is some chance that we're mistaken about p, we might still know that p is true. Fallibilists will tell you that an important virtue of their view is that infallibilism leads to skepticism. In this paper, we'll see that fallibilist impurism has considerable skeptical consequences of its own. We've missed this because we've focused our attention on the high-stakes cases that they discuss in trying to motivate their impurism about knowledge. We'll see this once we think about the fallibilist impurist's treatment of low-stakes cases. […] when error would be especially disastrous, few possibilities are properly ignored (Lewis 1996: 556, n. 12).http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452017000400031&lng=en&tlng=enPragmatic Encroachment
spellingShingle Clayton Littlejohn
Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment
Manuscrito
Pragmatic Encroachment
title Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment
title_full Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment
title_fullStr Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment
title_full_unstemmed Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment
title_short Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment
title_sort small stakes give you the blues the skeptical costs of pragmatic encroachment
topic Pragmatic Encroachment
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452017000400031&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT claytonlittlejohn smallstakesgiveyouthebluestheskepticalcostsofpragmaticencroachment