Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario

Background Ankle injuries are one of the most common presentations in emergency department. Ottawa Ankle Rules (OARs) have been used to predict the requirement of radiographs. Objectives This study aimed to validate the OARs protocol for predicting ank...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meena, Gangary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kashan University of Medical Sciences 2015-06-01
Series:Archives of Trauma Research
Online Access: http://archtrauma.com/?page=article&article_id=20969
_version_ 1827850699694669824
author Meena
Gangary
author_facet Meena
Gangary
author_sort Meena
collection DOAJ
description Background Ankle injuries are one of the most common presentations in emergency department. Ottawa Ankle Rules (OARs) have been used to predict the requirement of radiographs. Objectives This study aimed to validate the OARs protocol for predicting ankle and midfoot fractures in Indian population. Patients and Methods A prospective study was conducted in a teaching hospital in north India, during a period of nine months, including all patients who presented with complaints in the ankle region and evolution of less than 48 hours. The study excluded patients with multiple trauma and Glasgow coma scale of less than 15. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, followed by radiographs depending upon the location of the complaints. Radiographic study results were evaluated by orthopedic surgeons who had not seen the patient. Results We evaluated 140 patients (84 males and 60 females) with the mean age of 35.2 (range, 8 - 76 years). Of the 140 evaluable patients, 71 had positive criteria for radiological evaluation of which 43 presented with fracture, 69 had negative criteria for radiography with no fracture. The sensitivity of OARs to detect fractures was 100%. The implementation of the OARs appears to have the potential to reduce the number of radiographs for the assessment of these patients by about 51%. Conclusions The implementations of OARs have the potential to reduce the number of X-ray graphics needed to assess these patients by about 51%. The results of this study demonstrate no false negatives and are in agreement with results from other similar studies. It encourages us to implement these criteria in our services urgently, with all the resulting socio-economic implications.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:21:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-12893cdb46524b6faa3e18ce7ea4f2f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-953X
2251-9599
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:21:20Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Kashan University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Archives of Trauma Research
spelling doaj.art-12893cdb46524b6faa3e18ce7ea4f2f72023-09-02T10:01:47ZengKashan University of Medical SciencesArchives of Trauma Research2251-953X2251-95992015-06-014210.5812/atr.4(2)2015.20969Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian ScenarioMeenaGangaryBackground Ankle injuries are one of the most common presentations in emergency department. Ottawa Ankle Rules (OARs) have been used to predict the requirement of radiographs. Objectives This study aimed to validate the OARs protocol for predicting ankle and midfoot fractures in Indian population. Patients and Methods A prospective study was conducted in a teaching hospital in north India, during a period of nine months, including all patients who presented with complaints in the ankle region and evolution of less than 48 hours. The study excluded patients with multiple trauma and Glasgow coma scale of less than 15. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, followed by radiographs depending upon the location of the complaints. Radiographic study results were evaluated by orthopedic surgeons who had not seen the patient. Results We evaluated 140 patients (84 males and 60 females) with the mean age of 35.2 (range, 8 - 76 years). Of the 140 evaluable patients, 71 had positive criteria for radiological evaluation of which 43 presented with fracture, 69 had negative criteria for radiography with no fracture. The sensitivity of OARs to detect fractures was 100%. The implementation of the OARs appears to have the potential to reduce the number of radiographs for the assessment of these patients by about 51%. Conclusions The implementations of OARs have the potential to reduce the number of X-ray graphics needed to assess these patients by about 51%. The results of this study demonstrate no false negatives and are in agreement with results from other similar studies. It encourages us to implement these criteria in our services urgently, with all the resulting socio-economic implications. http://archtrauma.com/?page=article&article_id=20969
spellingShingle Meena
Gangary
Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario
Archives of Trauma Research
title Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario
title_full Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario
title_fullStr Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario
title_short Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario
title_sort validation of the ottawa ankle rules in indian scenario
url http://archtrauma.com/?page=article&article_id=20969
work_keys_str_mv AT meena validationoftheottawaanklerulesinindianscenario
AT gangary validationoftheottawaanklerulesinindianscenario