Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro

The neural tube consists of neural progenitors (NPs) that acquire different characteristics during gestation due to patterning factors. However, the influence of such patterning factors on human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) during in vitro neural differentiation is often unclear. This study compar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aishwarya G. Nadadhur, Prisca S. Leferink, Dwayne Holmes, Lisa Hinz, Paulien Cornelissen-Steijger, Lisa Gasparotto, Vivi M. Heine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-10-01
Series:Stem Cell Research
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506118302101
_version_ 1819051540272381952
author Aishwarya G. Nadadhur
Prisca S. Leferink
Dwayne Holmes
Lisa Hinz
Paulien Cornelissen-Steijger
Lisa Gasparotto
Vivi M. Heine
author_facet Aishwarya G. Nadadhur
Prisca S. Leferink
Dwayne Holmes
Lisa Hinz
Paulien Cornelissen-Steijger
Lisa Gasparotto
Vivi M. Heine
author_sort Aishwarya G. Nadadhur
collection DOAJ
description The neural tube consists of neural progenitors (NPs) that acquire different characteristics during gestation due to patterning factors. However, the influence of such patterning factors on human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) during in vitro neural differentiation is often unclear. This study compared neural induction protocols involving in vitro patterning with single SMAD inhibition (SSI), retinoic acid (RA) administration and dual SMAD inhibition (DSI). While the derived NP cells expressed known NP markers, they differed in their NP expression profile and differentiation potential. Cortical neuronal cells generated from 1) SSI NPs exhibited less mature neuronal phenotypes, 2) RA NPs exhibited an increased GABAergic phenotype, and 3) DSI NPs exhibited greater expression of glutamatergic lineage markers. Further, although all NPs generated astrocytes, astrocytes derived from the RA-induced NPs had the highest GFAP expression. Differences between NP populations included differential expression of regional identity markers HOXB4, LBX1, OTX1 and GSX2, which persisted into mature neural cell stages. This study suggests that patterning factors regulate how potential NPs may differentiate into specific neuronal and glial cell types in vitro. This challenges the utility of generic neural induction procedures, while highlighting the importance of carefully selecting specific NP protocols. Keywords: Neural progenitors, Patterning factors, In vitro, Pluripotent stem cells, Astrocytes, Neurons
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:05:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-128c9cd914a949019dc4a7818799f84e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1873-5061
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:05:34Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Stem Cell Research
spelling doaj.art-128c9cd914a949019dc4a7818799f84e2022-12-21T19:04:43ZengElsevierStem Cell Research1873-50612018-10-01322534Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitroAishwarya G. Nadadhur0Prisca S. Leferink1Dwayne Holmes2Lisa Hinz3Paulien Cornelissen-Steijger4Lisa Gasparotto5Vivi M. Heine6Department of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsPediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsPediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsPediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsPediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsPediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Corresponding author at: Pediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.The neural tube consists of neural progenitors (NPs) that acquire different characteristics during gestation due to patterning factors. However, the influence of such patterning factors on human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) during in vitro neural differentiation is often unclear. This study compared neural induction protocols involving in vitro patterning with single SMAD inhibition (SSI), retinoic acid (RA) administration and dual SMAD inhibition (DSI). While the derived NP cells expressed known NP markers, they differed in their NP expression profile and differentiation potential. Cortical neuronal cells generated from 1) SSI NPs exhibited less mature neuronal phenotypes, 2) RA NPs exhibited an increased GABAergic phenotype, and 3) DSI NPs exhibited greater expression of glutamatergic lineage markers. Further, although all NPs generated astrocytes, astrocytes derived from the RA-induced NPs had the highest GFAP expression. Differences between NP populations included differential expression of regional identity markers HOXB4, LBX1, OTX1 and GSX2, which persisted into mature neural cell stages. This study suggests that patterning factors regulate how potential NPs may differentiate into specific neuronal and glial cell types in vitro. This challenges the utility of generic neural induction procedures, while highlighting the importance of carefully selecting specific NP protocols. Keywords: Neural progenitors, Patterning factors, In vitro, Pluripotent stem cells, Astrocytes, Neuronshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506118302101
spellingShingle Aishwarya G. Nadadhur
Prisca S. Leferink
Dwayne Holmes
Lisa Hinz
Paulien Cornelissen-Steijger
Lisa Gasparotto
Vivi M. Heine
Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro
Stem Cell Research
title Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro
title_full Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro
title_fullStr Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro
title_short Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro
title_sort patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506118302101
work_keys_str_mv AT aishwaryagnadadhur patterningfactorsduringneuralprogenitorinductiondetermineregionalidentityanddifferentiationpotentialinvitro
AT priscasleferink patterningfactorsduringneuralprogenitorinductiondetermineregionalidentityanddifferentiationpotentialinvitro
AT dwayneholmes patterningfactorsduringneuralprogenitorinductiondetermineregionalidentityanddifferentiationpotentialinvitro
AT lisahinz patterningfactorsduringneuralprogenitorinductiondetermineregionalidentityanddifferentiationpotentialinvitro
AT pauliencornelissensteijger patterningfactorsduringneuralprogenitorinductiondetermineregionalidentityanddifferentiationpotentialinvitro
AT lisagasparotto patterningfactorsduringneuralprogenitorinductiondetermineregionalidentityanddifferentiationpotentialinvitro
AT vivimheine patterningfactorsduringneuralprogenitorinductiondetermineregionalidentityanddifferentiationpotentialinvitro