Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation Type

Background Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is preferred for paroxysmal AF (PAF) but selectively performed in patients with persistent AF (PersAF). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic differences and consequences of CA based on the AF type. Methods and Results Data from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroshi Miyama, Seiji Takatsuki, Nobuhiro Ikemura, Takehiro Kimura, Yoshinori Katsumata, Shuhei Yamashita, Koki Yamaoka, Susumu Ibe, Yuta Seki, Terumasa Yamashita, Kenji Hashimoto, Ikuko Ueda, Koji Ueno, Takahiro Ohki, Keiichi Fukuda, Shun Kohsaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.029321
_version_ 1797632525210746880
author Hiroshi Miyama
Seiji Takatsuki
Nobuhiro Ikemura
Takehiro Kimura
Yoshinori Katsumata
Shuhei Yamashita
Koki Yamaoka
Susumu Ibe
Yuta Seki
Terumasa Yamashita
Kenji Hashimoto
Ikuko Ueda
Koji Ueno
Takahiro Ohki
Keiichi Fukuda
Shun Kohsaka
author_facet Hiroshi Miyama
Seiji Takatsuki
Nobuhiro Ikemura
Takehiro Kimura
Yoshinori Katsumata
Shuhei Yamashita
Koki Yamaoka
Susumu Ibe
Yuta Seki
Terumasa Yamashita
Kenji Hashimoto
Ikuko Ueda
Koji Ueno
Takahiro Ohki
Keiichi Fukuda
Shun Kohsaka
author_sort Hiroshi Miyama
collection DOAJ
description Background Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is preferred for paroxysmal AF (PAF) but selectively performed in patients with persistent AF (PersAF). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic differences and consequences of CA based on the AF type. Methods and Results Data from a multicenter AF cohort study were analyzed, categorizing patients as PAF or PersAF according to AF duration (≤7 or >7 days, respectively). A composite of all‐cause death, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, and bleeding events during 2‐year follow‐up and changes in the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐life score were compared. Additionally, propensity score matching was performed to compare clinical outcomes of patients with and without CA in both AF types. Among 2788 patients, 51.6% and 48.4% had PAF and PersAF, respectively. Patients with PersAF had a higher incidence of the composite outcome (12.8% versus 7.2%; P<0.001) and smaller improvements in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐life scores than those with PAF. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, PersAF was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.30–1.78], P=0.031) and was associated with poor improvements in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐life scores. Propensity score matching analysis showed that the CA group had significantly fewer adverse events than the medication group among patients with PAF (odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.18–0.68]; P=0.002). Patients with PersAF showed a similar but nonsignificant trend. Conclusions PersAF is a risk factor for worse clinical outcomes, including patients' health status. CA is associated with fewer adverse events, although careful consideration is required based on the AF type.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:38:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-129d8c34ad55490abc63cbdb251e0469
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:38:14Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-129d8c34ad55490abc63cbdb251e04692023-11-10T10:23:42ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802023-09-01121810.1161/JAHA.122.029321Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation TypeHiroshi Miyama0Seiji Takatsuki1Nobuhiro Ikemura2Takehiro Kimura3Yoshinori Katsumata4Shuhei Yamashita5Koki Yamaoka6Susumu Ibe7Yuta Seki8Terumasa Yamashita9Kenji Hashimoto10Ikuko Ueda11Koji Ueno12Takahiro Ohki13Keiichi Fukuda14Shun Kohsaka15Department of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital Tochigi JapanDepartment of Cardiology Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital Chiba JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanBackground Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is preferred for paroxysmal AF (PAF) but selectively performed in patients with persistent AF (PersAF). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic differences and consequences of CA based on the AF type. Methods and Results Data from a multicenter AF cohort study were analyzed, categorizing patients as PAF or PersAF according to AF duration (≤7 or >7 days, respectively). A composite of all‐cause death, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, and bleeding events during 2‐year follow‐up and changes in the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐life score were compared. Additionally, propensity score matching was performed to compare clinical outcomes of patients with and without CA in both AF types. Among 2788 patients, 51.6% and 48.4% had PAF and PersAF, respectively. Patients with PersAF had a higher incidence of the composite outcome (12.8% versus 7.2%; P<0.001) and smaller improvements in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐life scores than those with PAF. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, PersAF was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.30–1.78], P=0.031) and was associated with poor improvements in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐life scores. Propensity score matching analysis showed that the CA group had significantly fewer adverse events than the medication group among patients with PAF (odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.18–0.68]; P=0.002). Patients with PersAF showed a similar but nonsignificant trend. Conclusions PersAF is a risk factor for worse clinical outcomes, including patients' health status. CA is associated with fewer adverse events, although careful consideration is required based on the AF type.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.029321atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationhealth‐related quality of lifeparoxysmal atrial fibrillationpersistent atrial fibrillation
spellingShingle Hiroshi Miyama
Seiji Takatsuki
Nobuhiro Ikemura
Takehiro Kimura
Yoshinori Katsumata
Shuhei Yamashita
Koki Yamaoka
Susumu Ibe
Yuta Seki
Terumasa Yamashita
Kenji Hashimoto
Ikuko Ueda
Koji Ueno
Takahiro Ohki
Keiichi Fukuda
Shun Kohsaka
Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation Type
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
atrial fibrillation
catheter ablation
health‐related quality of life
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
persistent atrial fibrillation
title Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation Type
title_full Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation Type
title_fullStr Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation Type
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation Type
title_short Prognostic Implications and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation by Atrial Fibrillation Type
title_sort prognostic implications and efficacy of catheter ablation by atrial fibrillation type
topic atrial fibrillation
catheter ablation
health‐related quality of life
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
persistent atrial fibrillation
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.029321
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroshimiyama prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT seijitakatsuki prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT nobuhiroikemura prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT takehirokimura prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT yoshinorikatsumata prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT shuheiyamashita prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT kokiyamaoka prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT susumuibe prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT yutaseki prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT terumasayamashita prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT kenjihashimoto prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT ikukoueda prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT kojiueno prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT takahiroohki prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT keiichifukuda prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype
AT shunkohsaka prognosticimplicationsandefficacyofcatheterablationbyatrialfibrillationtype