Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys

Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) were tested for counting Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redds as a more accurate, safer alternative to manned helicopter flights. Counting redds from the helicopter was less expensive and time consuming, but of the total redds counted at selected sites wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Phillip A. Groves, Brad Alcorn, Michelle M. Wiest, Jacek M. Maselko, William P. Connor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2016-11-01
Series:FACETS
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0019
_version_ 1818950944281329664
author Phillip A. Groves
Brad Alcorn
Michelle M. Wiest
Jacek M. Maselko
William P. Connor
author_facet Phillip A. Groves
Brad Alcorn
Michelle M. Wiest
Jacek M. Maselko
William P. Connor
author_sort Phillip A. Groves
collection DOAJ
description Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) were tested for counting Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redds as a more accurate, safer alternative to manned helicopter flights. Counting redds from the helicopter was less expensive and time consuming, but of the total redds counted at selected sites with a UAS, an average (± SD) of only 77% ± 14% was counted from the helicopter. A river-wide census of redds was not possible with a UAS because the study area was too large for the single field crew to survey. Simulation analyses were used to compare stratified random sampling (STRS) and sampling proportional to size (PPS) for estimating annual total redd counts from data collected with a UAS. The STRS estimates were more accurate and precise, whereas the PPS estimates, though biased, had 95% CIs that included the observed redd count more frequently. We strongly recommend that researchers conduct simulation analyses to evaluate alternative survey sampling methods if they are considering replacing census counts made from manned aircraft with counts estimated from data collected with a UAS. We conclude that UAS application reduces the risk inherent to manned aircraft flights, but the reduction in risk can come at the cost of estimates of population parameters that can sometimes be inaccurate and lack 95% CI coverage.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T09:26:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-12bf9ad4a6504bf5aa6b77dc4873d8e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2371-1671
2371-1671
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T09:26:38Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
record_format Article
series FACETS
spelling doaj.art-12bf9ad4a6504bf5aa6b77dc4873d8e82022-12-21T19:45:11ZengCanadian Science PublishingFACETS2371-16712371-16712016-11-01118720410.1139/facets-2016-0019Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveysPhillip A. Groves0Brad Alcorn1Michelle M. Wiest2Jacek M. Maselko3William P. Connor4Idaho Power Company, 1221 West Idaho Street, Boise, ID 83702, USAIdaho Power Company, 1221 West Idaho Street, Boise, ID 83702, USADepartment of Statistics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843, USADepartment of Statistics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843, USA; National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Auke Bay Laboratories, 17109 Pt. Lena Loop Rd., Juneau, AK 99801, USAUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, 276 Dworshak Complex Drive, Orofino, ID 83544, USAUnmanned aircraft systems (UASs) were tested for counting Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redds as a more accurate, safer alternative to manned helicopter flights. Counting redds from the helicopter was less expensive and time consuming, but of the total redds counted at selected sites with a UAS, an average (± SD) of only 77% ± 14% was counted from the helicopter. A river-wide census of redds was not possible with a UAS because the study area was too large for the single field crew to survey. Simulation analyses were used to compare stratified random sampling (STRS) and sampling proportional to size (PPS) for estimating annual total redd counts from data collected with a UAS. The STRS estimates were more accurate and precise, whereas the PPS estimates, though biased, had 95% CIs that included the observed redd count more frequently. We strongly recommend that researchers conduct simulation analyses to evaluate alternative survey sampling methods if they are considering replacing census counts made from manned aircraft with counts estimated from data collected with a UAS. We conclude that UAS application reduces the risk inherent to manned aircraft flights, but the reduction in risk can come at the cost of estimates of population parameters that can sometimes be inaccurate and lack 95% CI coverage.http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0019small unmanned aircraftsalmon spawning surveyspopulation estimates
spellingShingle Phillip A. Groves
Brad Alcorn
Michelle M. Wiest
Jacek M. Maselko
William P. Connor
Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
FACETS
small unmanned aircraft
salmon spawning surveys
population estimates
title Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
title_full Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
title_fullStr Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
title_full_unstemmed Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
title_short Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
title_sort testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys
topic small unmanned aircraft
salmon spawning surveys
population estimates
url http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0019
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipagroves testingunmannedaircraftsystemsforsalmonspawningsurveys
AT bradalcorn testingunmannedaircraftsystemsforsalmonspawningsurveys
AT michellemwiest testingunmannedaircraftsystemsforsalmonspawningsurveys
AT jacekmmaselko testingunmannedaircraftsystemsforsalmonspawningsurveys
AT williampconnor testingunmannedaircraftsystemsforsalmonspawningsurveys