Procalcitonin as an indicator of urosepsis

Koichi Sugimoto, Shogo Adomi, Hiroyuki Koike, Atsunobu Esa Department of Urology, NTT West Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan Background: Procalcitonin has been advocated as a marker of bacterial infection, so this study was carried out to determine the usefulness of serum procalcitonin in the early diagn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sugimoto K, Adomi S, Koike H, Esa A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2013-03-01
Series:Research and Reports in Urology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/procalcitonin-as-an-indicator-of-urosepsis-a12585
Description
Summary:Koichi Sugimoto, Shogo Adomi, Hiroyuki Koike, Atsunobu Esa Department of Urology, NTT West Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan Background: Procalcitonin has been advocated as a marker of bacterial infection, so this study was carried out to determine the usefulness of serum procalcitonin in the early diagnosis of urosepsis. Methods: The subjects were 37 febrile patients with urinary tract infection in whom we examined the serum procalcitonin concentration at the start of treatment. Results: Thirty patients had acute pyelonephritis (16 simple, 14 complex), one had emphysematous pyelonephritis, five had acute prostatitis, and one had acute epididymitis. The procalcitonin level was <0.5 ng/mL in 18 patients, &ge;0.5 ng/mL in one patient, &ge;2 ng/mL in seven patients, and &ge;10 ng/mL in 11 patients. Five of the 11 patients with procalcitonin levels &ge; 10 ng/mL had disseminated intravascular coagulation. All patients with urinary tract obstruction and disseminated intravascular coagulation had procalcitonin levels &ge; 10 ng/mL. Conclusion: Although this retrospective study comprised a small number of patients, we found that procalcitonin was a useful marker for urinary tract infection. Keywords: procalcitonin, urosepsis, urinary tract infection, urology
ISSN:2253-2447