Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates

BackgroundOral motor stimulation interventions improve oral feeding readiness and earlier full oral feeding in preterm neonates. However, using a structured method may improve the transition time to full oral feeds and feeding efficiency with respect to weight gain and exclusive breastfeeding when c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pari Singh, Nandini Malshe, Aditya Kallimath, Reema Garegrat, Arjun Verma, Nandini Nagar, Rajesh Maheshwari, Pradeep Suryawanshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1296863/full
_version_ 1797623096523358208
author Pari Singh
Nandini Malshe
Aditya Kallimath
Reema Garegrat
Arjun Verma
Nandini Nagar
Rajesh Maheshwari
Pradeep Suryawanshi
author_facet Pari Singh
Nandini Malshe
Aditya Kallimath
Reema Garegrat
Arjun Verma
Nandini Nagar
Rajesh Maheshwari
Pradeep Suryawanshi
author_sort Pari Singh
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundOral motor stimulation interventions improve oral feeding readiness and earlier full oral feeding in preterm neonates. However, using a structured method may improve the transition time to full oral feeds and feeding efficiency with respect to weight gain and exclusive breastfeeding when compared to an unstructured intervention.ObjectiveTo compare the effect of Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) and routine oromotor stimulation (OMS) on oral feeding readiness.MethodsRandomised controlled trial conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit between June-December 2022. Preterm neonates, 29+0–33+6 weeks corrected gestational age, were studied. The intervention group received PIOMI and the control group received OMS. Primary outcome: time to oral feeding readiness by Premature Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) score ≥30. Secondary outcomes: time to full oral feeds, duration of hospitalisation, weight gain, and exclusive breastfeeding rates.ResultsA total of 84 neonates were included and were randomised 42 each in PIOMI and OMS groups. The mean chronological age and time to oral feeding readiness were lower by 4.6 and 2.7 days, respectively, for PIOMI. The transition time to full oral feeds was 2 days lower for PIOMI and the duration of hospitalisation was 8 days lower. The average weight gain was 4.9 g/kg/day more and the exclusive breastfeeding rates at 1 month and 3 months post-discharge were higher by 24.5% and 27%, respectively, for the PIOMI group. The subgroup analysis of study outcomes based on sex and weight for gestational age showed significant weight gain on oral feeds in neonates receiving PIOMI. Similarly, the subgroup analysis based on gestational age favoured the PIOMI group with significantly earlier transition time and weight gain on oral feeds for the neonates >28 weeks of gestational age. The odds of achieving oral feeding readiness by 30 days [OR 1.558 (0.548–4.426)], full oral feeds by 45 days [OR 1.275 (0.449–3.620)], and exclusive breastfeeding at 1 month [OR 6.364 (1.262–32.079)] and 3 months [3.889 (1.186–12.749)] after discharge were higher with PIOMI.ConclusionPIOMI is a more effective oromotor stimulation method for earlier and improved oral feeding in preterm neonates. Clinical trial registrationhttps://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pdf_generate.php?trialid=70054&EncHid=34792.72281&modid=1&compid=19','70054det', identifier, CTRI/2022/06/043048.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:20:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-12c51396368b42d4910aa1b033f10969
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:20:47Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-12c51396368b42d4910aa1b033f109692023-11-16T18:21:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602023-11-011110.3389/fped.2023.12968631296863Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonatesPari Singh0Nandini Malshe1Aditya Kallimath2Reema Garegrat3Arjun Verma4Nandini Nagar5Rajesh Maheshwari6Pradeep Suryawanshi7Department of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune, IndiaDepartment of Neonatology, Cloudnine Hospital, Bengaluru, IndiaDepartment of Neonatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, AustraliaDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune, IndiaBackgroundOral motor stimulation interventions improve oral feeding readiness and earlier full oral feeding in preterm neonates. However, using a structured method may improve the transition time to full oral feeds and feeding efficiency with respect to weight gain and exclusive breastfeeding when compared to an unstructured intervention.ObjectiveTo compare the effect of Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) and routine oromotor stimulation (OMS) on oral feeding readiness.MethodsRandomised controlled trial conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit between June-December 2022. Preterm neonates, 29+0–33+6 weeks corrected gestational age, were studied. The intervention group received PIOMI and the control group received OMS. Primary outcome: time to oral feeding readiness by Premature Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) score ≥30. Secondary outcomes: time to full oral feeds, duration of hospitalisation, weight gain, and exclusive breastfeeding rates.ResultsA total of 84 neonates were included and were randomised 42 each in PIOMI and OMS groups. The mean chronological age and time to oral feeding readiness were lower by 4.6 and 2.7 days, respectively, for PIOMI. The transition time to full oral feeds was 2 days lower for PIOMI and the duration of hospitalisation was 8 days lower. The average weight gain was 4.9 g/kg/day more and the exclusive breastfeeding rates at 1 month and 3 months post-discharge were higher by 24.5% and 27%, respectively, for the PIOMI group. The subgroup analysis of study outcomes based on sex and weight for gestational age showed significant weight gain on oral feeds in neonates receiving PIOMI. Similarly, the subgroup analysis based on gestational age favoured the PIOMI group with significantly earlier transition time and weight gain on oral feeds for the neonates >28 weeks of gestational age. The odds of achieving oral feeding readiness by 30 days [OR 1.558 (0.548–4.426)], full oral feeds by 45 days [OR 1.275 (0.449–3.620)], and exclusive breastfeeding at 1 month [OR 6.364 (1.262–32.079)] and 3 months [3.889 (1.186–12.749)] after discharge were higher with PIOMI.ConclusionPIOMI is a more effective oromotor stimulation method for earlier and improved oral feeding in preterm neonates. Clinical trial registrationhttps://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pdf_generate.php?trialid=70054&EncHid=34792.72281&modid=1&compid=19','70054det', identifier, CTRI/2022/06/043048.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1296863/fullneonateoral motor stimulationprematurityoral feeding readinessexclusive breastfeeding
spellingShingle Pari Singh
Nandini Malshe
Aditya Kallimath
Reema Garegrat
Arjun Verma
Nandini Nagar
Rajesh Maheshwari
Pradeep Suryawanshi
Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates
Frontiers in Pediatrics
neonate
oral motor stimulation
prematurity
oral feeding readiness
exclusive breastfeeding
title Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates
title_full Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates
title_short Randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of PIOMI (structured) and routine oromotor (unstructured) stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates
title_sort randomised controlled trial to compare the effect of piomi structured and routine oromotor unstructured stimulation in improving readiness for oral feeding in preterm neonates
topic neonate
oral motor stimulation
prematurity
oral feeding readiness
exclusive breastfeeding
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1296863/full
work_keys_str_mv AT parisingh randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates
AT nandinimalshe randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates
AT adityakallimath randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates
AT reemagaregrat randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates
AT arjunverma randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates
AT nandininagar randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates
AT rajeshmaheshwari randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates
AT pradeepsuryawanshi randomisedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectofpiomistructuredandroutineoromotorunstructuredstimulationinimprovingreadinessfororalfeedinginpretermneonates