<i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semiotics

Inhalt (‘content’) is so common that it could hardly pass as a technical term. The purpose of this article is to show that from the 18<sup>th</sup> to the 20<sup>th</sup> century it was nevertheless used particularly to denote the specifically musical meaning arising from wha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolas Meeùs
Format: Article
Language:Croatian
Published: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje 2018-01-01
Series:Rasprave Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/318296
_version_ 1797207455398100992
author Nicolas Meeùs
author_facet Nicolas Meeùs
author_sort Nicolas Meeùs
collection DOAJ
description Inhalt (‘content’) is so common that it could hardly pass as a technical term. The purpose of this article is to show that from the 18<sup>th</sup> to the 20<sup>th</sup> century it was nevertheless used particularly to denote the specifically musical meaning arising from what music ‘contains’ of notes, rhythms, melodic cells, etc. Hegel, Marx, Hauptmann, Hanslick, Schenker, Schoenberg and probably others shared the same view that music has a content of its own, one that cannot be translated in verbal language.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:23:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-12d82cbbab3449d48da23c00d1b58c1c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1331-6745
1849-0379
language Croatian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:23:11Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje
record_format Article
series Rasprave Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje
spelling doaj.art-12d82cbbab3449d48da23c00d1b58c1c2024-04-15T15:24:52ZhrvInstitut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovljeRasprave Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje1331-67451849-03792018-01-0144253954910.31724/rihjj.44.2.14<i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semioticsNicolas Meeùs0Institut de Recherche en Musicologie, CNRS, ParisInhalt (‘content’) is so common that it could hardly pass as a technical term. The purpose of this article is to show that from the 18<sup>th</sup> to the 20<sup>th</sup> century it was nevertheless used particularly to denote the specifically musical meaning arising from what music ‘contains’ of notes, rhythms, melodic cells, etc. Hegel, Marx, Hauptmann, Hanslick, Schenker, Schoenberg and probably others shared the same view that music has a content of its own, one that cannot be translated in verbal language.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/318296InhaltHegelHanslickSchenkerSchoenberg
spellingShingle Nicolas Meeùs
<i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semiotics
Rasprave Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje
Inhalt
Hegel
Hanslick
Schenker
Schoenberg
title <i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semiotics
title_full <i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semiotics
title_fullStr <i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semiotics
title_full_unstemmed <i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semiotics
title_short <i>Inhalt</i> (‘content’) as a technical term in musical semiotics
title_sort i inhalt i content as a technical term in musical semiotics
topic Inhalt
Hegel
Hanslick
Schenker
Schoenberg
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/318296
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasmeeus iinhalticontentasatechnicalterminmusicalsemiotics