Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern Italy

Using the global climate model outputs without any adjustment may bring errors in water resources and climate change investigations. This study tackles the critical issue of bias correction temperature in ERA5-Land reanalysis for 10 ground stations in northern Italy using nine machine learning (ML)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Majid Niazkar, Reza Piraei, Andrea Menapace, Pranav Dhawan, Daniele Dalla Torre, Michele Larcher, Maurizio Righetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Water and Climate Change
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/15/1/271
_version_ 1797202719950241792
author Majid Niazkar
Reza Piraei
Andrea Menapace
Pranav Dhawan
Daniele Dalla Torre
Michele Larcher
Maurizio Righetti
author_facet Majid Niazkar
Reza Piraei
Andrea Menapace
Pranav Dhawan
Daniele Dalla Torre
Michele Larcher
Maurizio Righetti
author_sort Majid Niazkar
collection DOAJ
description Using the global climate model outputs without any adjustment may bring errors in water resources and climate change investigations. This study tackles the critical issue of bias correction temperature in ERA5-Land reanalysis for 10 ground stations in northern Italy using nine machine learning (ML) techniques. Among standalone ML models, XGBoost regression emerged as the most effective standalone ML model, outperforming others across 6 out of 10 stations, while random forest regression, Gaussian process regression, and support vector regression obtained the second to fourth places. In contrast, AdaBoost regression (ABR) achieved the least favorable performance. Furthermore, nine ensemble ML models are proposed to correct bias of the reanalysis of temperature data. The results indicated that the K-nearest neighbors-based ensemble model excelled and secured the top rank in 7 out of 10 stations, while the multiple linear regression-based ensemble model achieved the highest precision in 4 out of 10 stations. Furthermore, other ML-based ensemble models displayed satisfactory results. On the other hand, the ABR-based ensemble model exhibited the lowest accuracy among ML-based ensemble models. The findings highlight the potential of ML-based ensemble models in effectively addressing bias correction in climate data. HIGHLIGHTS Proposing nine ensemble ML models for bias correction.; Introducing nine standalone ML models for bias correction.; Correcting temperature data of ERA5-Land for a case study in northern Italy.; Comparison of different ML-based models for bias correction.; Correcting data of climate data can enhance studying climate change impact assessment.;
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:17:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-12f3bba05a06422296f267179b4d9ee6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2040-2244
2408-9354
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:07:55Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IWA Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Water and Climate Change
spelling doaj.art-12f3bba05a06422296f267179b4d9ee62024-04-17T08:44:02ZengIWA PublishingJournal of Water and Climate Change2040-22442408-93542024-01-0115127128310.2166/wcc.2023.669669Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern ItalyMajid Niazkar0Reza Piraei1Andrea Menapace2Pranav Dhawan3Daniele Dalla Torre4Michele Larcher5Maurizio Righetti6 Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy Department of Civil Engineering, Shiraz University, 7134851156 Shiraz, Iran Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy Using the global climate model outputs without any adjustment may bring errors in water resources and climate change investigations. This study tackles the critical issue of bias correction temperature in ERA5-Land reanalysis for 10 ground stations in northern Italy using nine machine learning (ML) techniques. Among standalone ML models, XGBoost regression emerged as the most effective standalone ML model, outperforming others across 6 out of 10 stations, while random forest regression, Gaussian process regression, and support vector regression obtained the second to fourth places. In contrast, AdaBoost regression (ABR) achieved the least favorable performance. Furthermore, nine ensemble ML models are proposed to correct bias of the reanalysis of temperature data. The results indicated that the K-nearest neighbors-based ensemble model excelled and secured the top rank in 7 out of 10 stations, while the multiple linear regression-based ensemble model achieved the highest precision in 4 out of 10 stations. Furthermore, other ML-based ensemble models displayed satisfactory results. On the other hand, the ABR-based ensemble model exhibited the lowest accuracy among ML-based ensemble models. The findings highlight the potential of ML-based ensemble models in effectively addressing bias correction in climate data. HIGHLIGHTS Proposing nine ensemble ML models for bias correction.; Introducing nine standalone ML models for bias correction.; Correcting temperature data of ERA5-Land for a case study in northern Italy.; Comparison of different ML-based models for bias correction.; Correcting data of climate data can enhance studying climate change impact assessment.;http://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/15/1/271bias correctionensemble modelera5-landmachine learningxgboost
spellingShingle Majid Niazkar
Reza Piraei
Andrea Menapace
Pranav Dhawan
Daniele Dalla Torre
Michele Larcher
Maurizio Righetti
Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern Italy
Journal of Water and Climate Change
bias correction
ensemble model
era5-land
machine learning
xgboost
title Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern Italy
title_full Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern Italy
title_fullStr Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern Italy
title_full_unstemmed Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern Italy
title_short Bias correction of ERA5-Land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models: a case of northern Italy
title_sort bias correction of era5 land temperature data using standalone and ensemble machine learning models a case of northern italy
topic bias correction
ensemble model
era5-land
machine learning
xgboost
url http://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/15/1/271
work_keys_str_mv AT majidniazkar biascorrectionofera5landtemperaturedatausingstandaloneandensemblemachinelearningmodelsacaseofnorthernitaly
AT rezapiraei biascorrectionofera5landtemperaturedatausingstandaloneandensemblemachinelearningmodelsacaseofnorthernitaly
AT andreamenapace biascorrectionofera5landtemperaturedatausingstandaloneandensemblemachinelearningmodelsacaseofnorthernitaly
AT pranavdhawan biascorrectionofera5landtemperaturedatausingstandaloneandensemblemachinelearningmodelsacaseofnorthernitaly
AT danieledallatorre biascorrectionofera5landtemperaturedatausingstandaloneandensemblemachinelearningmodelsacaseofnorthernitaly
AT michelelarcher biascorrectionofera5landtemperaturedatausingstandaloneandensemblemachinelearningmodelsacaseofnorthernitaly
AT mauriziorighetti biascorrectionofera5landtemperaturedatausingstandaloneandensemblemachinelearningmodelsacaseofnorthernitaly