Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen

Abstract Transitioning across biological scales is a central challenge in land surface models. Processes that operate at the scale of individual leaves must be scaled to canopies, and this is done using dedicated submodels. Here, we focus on a submodel that prescribes how light and nitrogen are dist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ethan E. Butler, Ming Chen, Daniel Ricciuto, Habacuc Flores‐Moreno, Kirk R. Wythers, Jens Kattge, Peter E. Thornton, Peter B. Reich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002237
_version_ 1818354405327503360
author Ethan E. Butler
Ming Chen
Daniel Ricciuto
Habacuc Flores‐Moreno
Kirk R. Wythers
Jens Kattge
Peter E. Thornton
Peter B. Reich
author_facet Ethan E. Butler
Ming Chen
Daniel Ricciuto
Habacuc Flores‐Moreno
Kirk R. Wythers
Jens Kattge
Peter E. Thornton
Peter B. Reich
author_sort Ethan E. Butler
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Transitioning across biological scales is a central challenge in land surface models. Processes that operate at the scale of individual leaves must be scaled to canopies, and this is done using dedicated submodels. Here, we focus on a submodel that prescribes how light and nitrogen are distributed through plant canopies. We found a mathematical inconsistency in a submodel implemented in the Community and Energy Land Models (CLM and ELM), which incorporates twigs, branches, stems, and dead leaves in nitrogen scaling from leaf to canopy. The inconsistency leads to unrealistic (physically impossible) values of the nitrogen scaling coefficient. The mathematical inconsistency is a general mistake, that is, would occur in any model adopting this particular submodel. We resolve the inconsistency by allowing distinct profiles of stems and branches versus living leaves. We implemented the updated scheme in the ELM and find that the correction reduces global mean gross primary production (GPP) by 3.9 Pg C (3%). Further, when stems and branches are removed from the canopy in the updated model (akin to models that ignore shading from stems), global GPP increases by 4.1 Pg C (3.2%), because of reduced shading. Hence, models that entirely ignore stem shading also introduce errors in the global spatial distribution of GPP estimates, with a strong signal in the tropics, increasing GPP there by over 200 g C m−2 yr−1. Appropriately incorporating stems and other nonphotosynthesizing material into the light and nitrogen scaling routines of global land models, will improve their biological realism and accuracy.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T19:24:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1300707db4fb4e91b592c528cc0de125
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1942-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T19:24:54Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj.art-1300707db4fb4e91b592c528cc0de1252022-12-21T23:34:03ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662020-10-011210n/an/a10.1029/2020MS002237Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf NitrogenEthan E. Butler0Ming Chen1Daniel Ricciuto2Habacuc Flores‐Moreno3Kirk R. Wythers4Jens Kattge5Peter E. Thornton6Peter B. Reich7Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St. Paul MN USADepartment of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St. Paul MN USAEnvironmental Sciences Division, Climate Change Science Institute Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USADepartment of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St. Paul MN USADepartment of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St. Paul MN USAMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena GermanyEnvironmental Sciences Division, Climate Change Science Institute Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USADepartment of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St. Paul MN USAAbstract Transitioning across biological scales is a central challenge in land surface models. Processes that operate at the scale of individual leaves must be scaled to canopies, and this is done using dedicated submodels. Here, we focus on a submodel that prescribes how light and nitrogen are distributed through plant canopies. We found a mathematical inconsistency in a submodel implemented in the Community and Energy Land Models (CLM and ELM), which incorporates twigs, branches, stems, and dead leaves in nitrogen scaling from leaf to canopy. The inconsistency leads to unrealistic (physically impossible) values of the nitrogen scaling coefficient. The mathematical inconsistency is a general mistake, that is, would occur in any model adopting this particular submodel. We resolve the inconsistency by allowing distinct profiles of stems and branches versus living leaves. We implemented the updated scheme in the ELM and find that the correction reduces global mean gross primary production (GPP) by 3.9 Pg C (3%). Further, when stems and branches are removed from the canopy in the updated model (akin to models that ignore shading from stems), global GPP increases by 4.1 Pg C (3.2%), because of reduced shading. Hence, models that entirely ignore stem shading also introduce errors in the global spatial distribution of GPP estimates, with a strong signal in the tropics, increasing GPP there by over 200 g C m−2 yr−1. Appropriately incorporating stems and other nonphotosynthesizing material into the light and nitrogen scaling routines of global land models, will improve their biological realism and accuracy.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002237climatemodelingvegetationland surfacephotosynthesisnitrogen
spellingShingle Ethan E. Butler
Ming Chen
Daniel Ricciuto
Habacuc Flores‐Moreno
Kirk R. Wythers
Jens Kattge
Peter E. Thornton
Peter B. Reich
Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
climate
modeling
vegetation
land surface
photosynthesis
nitrogen
title Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen
title_full Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen
title_fullStr Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen
title_full_unstemmed Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen
title_short Seeing the Canopy for the Branches: Improved Within Canopy Scaling of Leaf Nitrogen
title_sort seeing the canopy for the branches improved within canopy scaling of leaf nitrogen
topic climate
modeling
vegetation
land surface
photosynthesis
nitrogen
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002237
work_keys_str_mv AT ethanebutler seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen
AT mingchen seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen
AT danielricciuto seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen
AT habacucfloresmoreno seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen
AT kirkrwythers seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen
AT jenskattge seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen
AT peterethornton seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen
AT peterbreich seeingthecanopyforthebranchesimprovedwithincanopyscalingofleafnitrogen