Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams

Aim: The response of ionization chamber changes when used at beam quality Q which is different from beam quality Qo (usually 60Co) that was used at the time of its calibration. Hence, one needs to apply beam quality correction factor (kQ, Qo) during dosimetric measurements. However, kQ, Qo data are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richa Sharma, Sunil Dutt Sharma, Priyanka Agarwal, Devesh Kumar Avasthi, Rohit Verma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2022;volume=47;issue=2;spage=159;epage=165;aulast=
_version_ 1797998898121277440
author Richa Sharma
Sunil Dutt Sharma
Priyanka Agarwal
Devesh Kumar Avasthi
Rohit Verma
author_facet Richa Sharma
Sunil Dutt Sharma
Priyanka Agarwal
Devesh Kumar Avasthi
Rohit Verma
author_sort Richa Sharma
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The response of ionization chamber changes when used at beam quality Q which is different from beam quality Qo (usually 60Co) that was used at the time of its calibration. Hence, one needs to apply beam quality correction factor (kQ, Qo) during dosimetric measurements. However, kQ, Qo data are unavailable for novel ion chambers in the literature. Moreover, most of such data do not differentiate between filtered (flat) and unfiltered (unflat) beams. In addition, literature-based data do not differentiate among different pieces of the ion chambers of the same make and model. Hence, the purpose of our study was to determine the ion chamber-specific experimental values of kQ, Qo and to evaluate their impact in dosimetry. Materials and Methods: In this work, the value of kQ, Qo were measured for six ionization chambers of three different types in 6, 10, and 15 MV filtered (with flattening filter [WFF]) as well as 6 and 10 MV unfiltered (flattening filter free [FFF]) photon beams. The measured values of kQ, Qo were compared with Monte Carlo-calculated values available in the literature. The uncertainties in measurement of kQ, Qo values were also evaluated. Results: For 6 MV FFF beam, the measured value of kQ, Qo was found to be consistently lower than 6 MV WFF beam for all Sun Nuclear Corporation ion chambers, while it was higher as per the theoretical data. The inter-chamber variation in kQ, Qo values was observed for the same model of the ion chambers. The maximum difference between absolute dose values on using the theoretical and experimental kQ, Qo values was up to 3.23%. Conclusion: The measured absolute dose values by the ion chamber of a given make and model were found different due to the use of its theoretical and experimental kQ, Qo values. Furthermore, the variation in response of different pieces of ion chambers of the same make and model cannot be accounted for theoretically, and hence, the use of theoretical kQ, Qo data may introduce an inherent error in the estimation of absorbed dose to water. This necessitates the use of measured value of kQ, Qo for each ionization chamber.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:56:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1329b599d31043ebbd6cc17c9c721e70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0971-6203
1998-3913
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:56:02Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Physics
spelling doaj.art-1329b599d31043ebbd6cc17c9c721e702022-12-22T04:28:46ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Physics0971-62031998-39132022-01-0147215916510.4103/jmp.jmp_101_21Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beamsRicha SharmaSunil Dutt SharmaPriyanka AgarwalDevesh Kumar AvasthiRohit VermaAim: The response of ionization chamber changes when used at beam quality Q which is different from beam quality Qo (usually 60Co) that was used at the time of its calibration. Hence, one needs to apply beam quality correction factor (kQ, Qo) during dosimetric measurements. However, kQ, Qo data are unavailable for novel ion chambers in the literature. Moreover, most of such data do not differentiate between filtered (flat) and unfiltered (unflat) beams. In addition, literature-based data do not differentiate among different pieces of the ion chambers of the same make and model. Hence, the purpose of our study was to determine the ion chamber-specific experimental values of kQ, Qo and to evaluate their impact in dosimetry. Materials and Methods: In this work, the value of kQ, Qo were measured for six ionization chambers of three different types in 6, 10, and 15 MV filtered (with flattening filter [WFF]) as well as 6 and 10 MV unfiltered (flattening filter free [FFF]) photon beams. The measured values of kQ, Qo were compared with Monte Carlo-calculated values available in the literature. The uncertainties in measurement of kQ, Qo values were also evaluated. Results: For 6 MV FFF beam, the measured value of kQ, Qo was found to be consistently lower than 6 MV WFF beam for all Sun Nuclear Corporation ion chambers, while it was higher as per the theoretical data. The inter-chamber variation in kQ, Qo values was observed for the same model of the ion chambers. The maximum difference between absolute dose values on using the theoretical and experimental kQ, Qo values was up to 3.23%. Conclusion: The measured absolute dose values by the ion chamber of a given make and model were found different due to the use of its theoretical and experimental kQ, Qo values. Furthermore, the variation in response of different pieces of ion chambers of the same make and model cannot be accounted for theoretically, and hence, the use of theoretical kQ, Qo data may introduce an inherent error in the estimation of absorbed dose to water. This necessitates the use of measured value of kQ, Qo for each ionization chamber.http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2022;volume=47;issue=2;spage=159;epage=165;aulast=beam quality correction factorflattening filter freeionization chamberuncertainty
spellingShingle Richa Sharma
Sunil Dutt Sharma
Priyanka Agarwal
Devesh Kumar Avasthi
Rohit Verma
Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams
Journal of Medical Physics
beam quality correction factor
flattening filter free
ionization chamber
uncertainty
title Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams
title_full Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams
title_short Evaluating the impact of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams
title_sort evaluating the impact of ionization chamber specific beam quality correction factor in dosimetry of filtered and unfiltered photon beams
topic beam quality correction factor
flattening filter free
ionization chamber
uncertainty
url http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2022;volume=47;issue=2;spage=159;epage=165;aulast=
work_keys_str_mv AT richasharma evaluatingtheimpactofionizationchamberspecificbeamqualitycorrectionfactorindosimetryoffilteredandunfilteredphotonbeams
AT sunilduttsharma evaluatingtheimpactofionizationchamberspecificbeamqualitycorrectionfactorindosimetryoffilteredandunfilteredphotonbeams
AT priyankaagarwal evaluatingtheimpactofionizationchamberspecificbeamqualitycorrectionfactorindosimetryoffilteredandunfilteredphotonbeams
AT deveshkumaravasthi evaluatingtheimpactofionizationchamberspecificbeamqualitycorrectionfactorindosimetryoffilteredandunfilteredphotonbeams
AT rohitverma evaluatingtheimpactofionizationchamberspecificbeamqualitycorrectionfactorindosimetryoffilteredandunfilteredphotonbeams