De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellum

The democratic paradox of the Roman Catholic State Party (RKSP). The ‘doctrine of the last resort’ as an expression of the growing solidarity between the Catholics and Social Democrats during the interbellum Between the First and Second World War, coalition-building was fairly problematic in Dutch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M.J.M. Hoogenboom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: openjournals.nl 2005-01-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4686
_version_ 1811271078414123008
author M.J.M. Hoogenboom
author_facet M.J.M. Hoogenboom
author_sort M.J.M. Hoogenboom
collection DOAJ
description The democratic paradox of the Roman Catholic State Party (RKSP). The ‘doctrine of the last resort’ as an expression of the growing solidarity between the Catholics and Social Democrats during the interbellum Between the First and Second World War, coalition-building was fairly problematic in Dutch politics. This was partly caused by the refusal of the Roman Catholic State Party (RKSP) to form a government coalition with the Social Democratic Labour Party (SDAP). On several occasions, the leadership of the party argued that the RKSP would only agree to collaborate in a so-called ‘Roman-red coalition’ out of ‘sheer necessity’. In the literature, roughly two interpretations of the Catholic refusal can be discerned. According to the first interpretation, the RKSP rejected a government coalition with the SDAP because the leadership of the party thought that the ideological differences between both parties were insurmountable. According to the second interpretation, the Catholic leadership refused to collaborate because it was afraid that the Catholic party would disintegrate as a result of the internal schism. In this article, it is claimed that the first interpretation is not tenable, and the second only partly. The refusal of the RKSP leadership to collaborate with the SDAP did not signify Catholic division or a clash between Catholic and social democratic principles but, paradoxically, a growing Catholic unity and a growing consensus between both parties. However, for the Catholic leaders a Roman-red coalition was a taboo subject since it would force the party to explicitly recognise that the Catholic and social democratic ideologies were reconcilable.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:13:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-13435e446eaa44b3be31e3d6a0989cbc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:13:48Z
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher openjournals.nl
record_format Article
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
spelling doaj.art-13435e446eaa44b3be31e3d6a0989cbc2022-12-22T03:14:36Zengopenjournals.nlBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982005-01-011204De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellumM.J.M. Hoogenboom The democratic paradox of the Roman Catholic State Party (RKSP). The ‘doctrine of the last resort’ as an expression of the growing solidarity between the Catholics and Social Democrats during the interbellum Between the First and Second World War, coalition-building was fairly problematic in Dutch politics. This was partly caused by the refusal of the Roman Catholic State Party (RKSP) to form a government coalition with the Social Democratic Labour Party (SDAP). On several occasions, the leadership of the party argued that the RKSP would only agree to collaborate in a so-called ‘Roman-red coalition’ out of ‘sheer necessity’. In the literature, roughly two interpretations of the Catholic refusal can be discerned. According to the first interpretation, the RKSP rejected a government coalition with the SDAP because the leadership of the party thought that the ideological differences between both parties were insurmountable. According to the second interpretation, the Catholic leadership refused to collaborate because it was afraid that the Catholic party would disintegrate as a result of the internal schism. In this article, it is claimed that the first interpretation is not tenable, and the second only partly. The refusal of the RKSP leadership to collaborate with the SDAP did not signify Catholic division or a clash between Catholic and social democratic principles but, paradoxically, a growing Catholic unity and a growing consensus between both parties. However, for the Catholic leaders a Roman-red coalition was a taboo subject since it would force the party to explicitly recognise that the Catholic and social democratic ideologies were reconcilable. https://ojs.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4686Political PartiesRoman CatholicismSocial democracy
spellingShingle M.J.M. Hoogenboom
De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellum
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Political Parties
Roman Catholicism
Social democracy
title De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellum
title_full De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellum
title_fullStr De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellum
title_full_unstemmed De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellum
title_short De democratische paradox van de RKSP. De 'leer van de uiterste noodzaak' als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal-democraten in het interbellum
title_sort de democratische paradox van de rksp de leer van de uiterste noodzaak als uiting van de groeiende eensgezindheid tussen katholieken en sociaal democraten in het interbellum
topic Political Parties
Roman Catholicism
Social democracy
url https://ojs.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4686
work_keys_str_mv AT mjmhoogenboom dedemocratischeparadoxvanderkspdeleervandeuiterstenoodzaakalsuitingvandegroeiendeeensgezindheidtussenkatholiekenensociaaldemocrateninhetinterbellum