Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations

Along the eastern coast of Kamchatka, at a number of localities, we have identified and attempted to assign ages to deposits of both historic and prehistoric (paleo-) tsunamis. These deposits are dated and correlated using tephrochronology from Holocene marker tephra and local volcanic ash laye...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. K. Pinegina, J. Bourgeois
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2001-01-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/1/177/2001/nhess-1-177-2001.pdf
_version_ 1811256378195443712
author T. K. Pinegina
J. Bourgeois
author_facet T. K. Pinegina
J. Bourgeois
author_sort T. K. Pinegina
collection DOAJ
description Along the eastern coast of Kamchatka, at a number of localities, we have identified and attempted to assign ages to deposits of both historic and prehistoric (paleo-) tsunamis. These deposits are dated and correlated using tephrochronology from Holocene marker tephra and local volcanic ash layers. Because the historical record of earthquakes and tsunamis on Kamchatka is so short, these investigations can make important contributions to evaluating tsunami hazards. Moreover, because even the historical record is spotty, our work helps add to and evaluate tsunami catalogues for Kamchatka. Furthermore, tsunami deposits provide a proxy record for large earthquakes and thus are important paleoseismological tools. The combined, preserved record of tsunami deposits and of numerous marker tephra on Kamchatka offers an unprecedented opportunity to study tsunami frequency. Using combined stratigraphic sections, we can examine both the average frequency of events for each locality, and also changes in frequency through time. Moreover, using key marker tephra as time lines, we can compare tsunami frequency and intensity records along the Kamchatka subduction zone. Preliminary results suggest real variations in frequency on a millennial time scale, with the period from about 0 to 1000 A.D. being particularly active at some localities.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T17:39:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1348c78c8cc14b28bccce4495d3f90b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T17:39:15Z
publishDate 2001-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1348c78c8cc14b28bccce4495d3f90b32022-12-22T03:22:51ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812001-01-0114177185Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlationsT. K. PineginaJ. BourgeoisAlong the eastern coast of Kamchatka, at a number of localities, we have identified and attempted to assign ages to deposits of both historic and prehistoric (paleo-) tsunamis. These deposits are dated and correlated using tephrochronology from Holocene marker tephra and local volcanic ash layers. Because the historical record of earthquakes and tsunamis on Kamchatka is so short, these investigations can make important contributions to evaluating tsunami hazards. Moreover, because even the historical record is spotty, our work helps add to and evaluate tsunami catalogues for Kamchatka. Furthermore, tsunami deposits provide a proxy record for large earthquakes and thus are important paleoseismological tools. The combined, preserved record of tsunami deposits and of numerous marker tephra on Kamchatka offers an unprecedented opportunity to study tsunami frequency. Using combined stratigraphic sections, we can examine both the average frequency of events for each locality, and also changes in frequency through time. Moreover, using key marker tephra as time lines, we can compare tsunami frequency and intensity records along the Kamchatka subduction zone. Preliminary results suggest real variations in frequency on a millennial time scale, with the period from about 0 to 1000 A.D. being particularly active at some localities.http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/1/177/2001/nhess-1-177-2001.pdf
spellingShingle T. K. Pinegina
J. Bourgeois
Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
title Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations
title_full Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations
title_fullStr Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations
title_full_unstemmed Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations
title_short Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations
title_sort historical and paleo tsunami deposits on kamchatka russia long term chronologies and long distance correlations
url http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/1/177/2001/nhess-1-177-2001.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tkpinegina historicalandpaleotsunamidepositsonkamchatkarussialongtermchronologiesandlongdistancecorrelations
AT jbourgeois historicalandpaleotsunamidepositsonkamchatkarussialongtermchronologiesandlongdistancecorrelations