Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thought
Interfaith communication and the conversation of followers of religions with each other is one of the most important necessities in the present age. Utilizing the knowledge of jurisprudence as a science expressing the practical duty of those in charge has a great role in explaining the ways of this...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Imam Sadiq University
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Religion & Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rc.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_75648_c52b1e06e9e63f9f923823c995ba4c9f.pdf |
_version_ | 1818988569454182400 |
---|---|
author | Seyyed Mahdi Marvian Hosseiny mohammadtaghi fakhlaei mohammadtaghi Qabuli |
author_facet | Seyyed Mahdi Marvian Hosseiny mohammadtaghi fakhlaei mohammadtaghi Qabuli |
author_sort | Seyyed Mahdi Marvian Hosseiny |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Interfaith communication and the conversation of followers of religions with each other is one of the most important necessities in the present age. Utilizing the knowledge of jurisprudence as a science expressing the practical duty of those in charge has a great role in explaining the ways of this communication and dialogue. Among the jurisprudential propositions that can be suggested as one of the ways of dialogue between religions, tolerance with religious opponents as gentleness, kindness and softness in relation to them. In the well-known jurisprudential thought of Imami jurists, the legitimacy of tolerant behaviors with opponents has been considered in the form of the doctrine of taqiyyah, and the practice of tolerant behavior has been conditioned by emergency and fear of harm and danger. On the other hand, some other jurists, although they have spoken of the behavior of orphans in the form of taqiyyah, have not considered it harmful and have not even considered the fear of receiving harm in the legitimacy of such behavior. The present article, which is a descriptive-analytical study, while considering the arguments of both views, considered the promotion of tolerant behaviors in the form of taqiyyah as only a temporary and unique emergency tactic and finally the necessity of tolerance and good association with religious opponents as a first principle. And it has resulted in fundamental communication and interfaith dialogue. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T19:24:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-134cd463b7ae411ab7129d3f3d034aee |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2252-0252 2588-6460 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T19:24:40Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | Imam Sadiq University |
record_format | Article |
series | Religion & Communication |
spelling | doaj.art-134cd463b7ae411ab7129d3f3d034aee2022-12-21T19:28:54ZfasImam Sadiq UniversityReligion & Communication2252-02522588-64602021-02-01275838140910.30497/rc.2021.7564875648Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thoughtSeyyed Mahdi Marvian Hosseiny0mohammadtaghi fakhlaei1mohammadtaghi Qabuli2دانش آموخته دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشکده الهیات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهدProfessor of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Ferdowsi University of MashhadAssociate Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Ferdowsi University of MashhadInterfaith communication and the conversation of followers of religions with each other is one of the most important necessities in the present age. Utilizing the knowledge of jurisprudence as a science expressing the practical duty of those in charge has a great role in explaining the ways of this communication and dialogue. Among the jurisprudential propositions that can be suggested as one of the ways of dialogue between religions, tolerance with religious opponents as gentleness, kindness and softness in relation to them. In the well-known jurisprudential thought of Imami jurists, the legitimacy of tolerant behaviors with opponents has been considered in the form of the doctrine of taqiyyah, and the practice of tolerant behavior has been conditioned by emergency and fear of harm and danger. On the other hand, some other jurists, although they have spoken of the behavior of orphans in the form of taqiyyah, have not considered it harmful and have not even considered the fear of receiving harm in the legitimacy of such behavior. The present article, which is a descriptive-analytical study, while considering the arguments of both views, considered the promotion of tolerant behaviors in the form of taqiyyah as only a temporary and unique emergency tactic and finally the necessity of tolerance and good association with religious opponents as a first principle. And it has resulted in fundamental communication and interfaith dialogue.https://rc.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_75648_c52b1e06e9e63f9f923823c995ba4c9f.pdftolerancepietyreligious oppositioninterfaith dialogueinterfaith communication |
spellingShingle | Seyyed Mahdi Marvian Hosseiny mohammadtaghi fakhlaei mohammadtaghi Qabuli Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thought Religion & Communication tolerance piety religious opposition interfaith dialogue interfaith communication |
title | Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thought |
title_full | Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thought |
title_fullStr | Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thought |
title_full_unstemmed | Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thought |
title_short | Explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in Imami jurisprudential thought |
title_sort | explaining and analyzing the ways of communication and dialogue between religions in imami jurisprudential thought |
topic | tolerance piety religious opposition interfaith dialogue interfaith communication |
url | https://rc.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_75648_c52b1e06e9e63f9f923823c995ba4c9f.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seyyedmahdimarvianhosseiny explainingandanalyzingthewaysofcommunicationanddialoguebetweenreligionsinimamijurisprudentialthought AT mohammadtaghifakhlaei explainingandanalyzingthewaysofcommunicationanddialoguebetweenreligionsinimamijurisprudentialthought AT mohammadtaghiqabuli explainingandanalyzingthewaysofcommunicationanddialoguebetweenreligionsinimamijurisprudentialthought |