A novel sequential endocardial mapping strategy for locating atrial fibrillation sources based on repetitive conduction patterns: An in-silico study

Background: In persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), localized extra-pulmonary vein sources may contribute to arrhythmia recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation. This in-silico study proposes a high-density sequential mapping strategy to localize such sources. Method: Catheter repositioning was gu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor Gonçalves Marques, Ali Gharaviri, Ozan Özgül, Simone Pezzuto, Angelo Auricchio, Pietro Bonizzi, Stef Zeemering, Ulrich Schotten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology Plus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976124000059
Description
Summary:Background: In persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), localized extra-pulmonary vein sources may contribute to arrhythmia recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation. This in-silico study proposes a high-density sequential mapping strategy to localize such sources. Method: Catheter repositioning was guided by repetitive conduction patterns, moving against the prevailing conduction direction (upstream) toward the sources. Sources were found either by locally identifying conduction patterns or by encircling the region harboring them. We simulated source tracking in an in-silico atrial model, comparing random vs. upstream-guided catheter repositioning (with and without encircling). To assess performance in increasing AF complexities, we simulated AF in 3 groups: atria with reentry-anchoring scars, without fibrosis, and with severe endomysial fibrosis. Results: Compared to random mapping, the upstream-guided approach successfully located sources more often (anchored reentries: 70.6% vs. 10.6%; no fibrosis: 87.9% vs. 22.1%; with fibrosis: 95.0% vs. 60.9% of tracking procedures, all p<0.001), using fewer steps (median [IQR]: 11 [7;23] vs. 26 [13;35]; 10 [6;19] vs. 19 [10;27]; 11 [7;19] vs. 16 [8;30], respectively, all p<0.05). Adding source encircling increased source detection (98.1 %, 100 %, and 99.5 %, all p<0.01 vs. local detection only), reducing required steps (9 [6;12], 8 [6;12], and 9 [6;13], all p<0.05). In some cases (11.9 %, 17.1 %, and 10.5 % of procedures), the algorithm encircled regions >15 mm from the source. Conclusion: Moving mapping catheters upstream improves source detection efficiency, even in the presence of severe fibrosis. Encircling sources may help find regions of interest in fewer steps.
ISSN:2772-9761