Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment

In this article, we undertake an empirical examination of the psychology of what is often called “the angry citizen,” highlighting ressentiment as an important emotional mechanism of grievance politics. Contrary to the short‐lived, action‐prone emotion of anger proper, ressentiment transmutes the in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tereza Capelos, Mikko Salmela, Gabija Krisciunaite
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2022-12-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5789
_version_ 1828084268422660096
author Tereza Capelos
Mikko Salmela
Gabija Krisciunaite
author_facet Tereza Capelos
Mikko Salmela
Gabija Krisciunaite
author_sort Tereza Capelos
collection DOAJ
description In this article, we undertake an empirical examination of the psychology of what is often called “the angry citizen,” highlighting ressentiment as an important emotional mechanism of grievance politics. Contrary to the short‐lived, action‐prone emotion of anger proper, ressentiment transmutes the inputs of grievance politics like deprivation of opportunity, injustice, shame, humiliation, envy, and inefficacious anger, into the anti‐social outputs of morally righteous indignation, destructive anger, hatred, and rage. Our empirical probe uses qualitative and quantitative analysis of 164 excerpts from interviews with US “angry citizens” from the following works: Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right (2016) by Arlie Russell Hochschild, Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era (2017) by Michael Kimmel, and Stiffed: The Roots of Modern Male Rage (2019) by Susan Faludi. In these seemingly “angry” excerpts, we find markers matching the psychological footprint of ressentiment instead of anger proper: victimhood, envy, powerlessness; the defenses of splitting, projection, and denial; and preference for inaction, anti‐preferences, and low efficacy. We conclude on the significance of the distinction between anger proper and ressentiment for understanding the psychology of grievance politics.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:22:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-136b58daa71b449081c633ba69922cef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2183-2463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:22:24Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Cogitatio
record_format Article
series Politics and Governance
spelling doaj.art-136b58daa71b449081c633ba69922cef2022-12-30T11:33:51ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632022-12-0110438439510.17645/pag.v10i4.57892847Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of RessentimentTereza Capelos0Mikko Salmela1Gabija Krisciunaite2Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, UKCenter for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark / Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, UKIn this article, we undertake an empirical examination of the psychology of what is often called “the angry citizen,” highlighting ressentiment as an important emotional mechanism of grievance politics. Contrary to the short‐lived, action‐prone emotion of anger proper, ressentiment transmutes the inputs of grievance politics like deprivation of opportunity, injustice, shame, humiliation, envy, and inefficacious anger, into the anti‐social outputs of morally righteous indignation, destructive anger, hatred, and rage. Our empirical probe uses qualitative and quantitative analysis of 164 excerpts from interviews with US “angry citizens” from the following works: Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right (2016) by Arlie Russell Hochschild, Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era (2017) by Michael Kimmel, and Stiffed: The Roots of Modern Male Rage (2019) by Susan Faludi. In these seemingly “angry” excerpts, we find markers matching the psychological footprint of ressentiment instead of anger proper: victimhood, envy, powerlessness; the defenses of splitting, projection, and denial; and preference for inaction, anti‐preferences, and low efficacy. We conclude on the significance of the distinction between anger proper and ressentiment for understanding the psychology of grievance politics.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5789angerangry citizenemotional mechanismgrievancephilosophypolitical psychologyressentimentresentmentunited states
spellingShingle Tereza Capelos
Mikko Salmela
Gabija Krisciunaite
Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment
Politics and Governance
anger
angry citizen
emotional mechanism
grievance
philosophy
political psychology
ressentiment
resentment
united states
title Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment
title_full Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment
title_fullStr Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment
title_full_unstemmed Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment
title_short Grievance Politics: An Empirical Analysis of Anger Through the Emotional Mechanism of Ressentiment
title_sort grievance politics an empirical analysis of anger through the emotional mechanism of ressentiment
topic anger
angry citizen
emotional mechanism
grievance
philosophy
political psychology
ressentiment
resentment
united states
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5789
work_keys_str_mv AT terezacapelos grievancepoliticsanempiricalanalysisofangerthroughtheemotionalmechanismofressentiment
AT mikkosalmela grievancepoliticsanempiricalanalysisofangerthroughtheemotionalmechanismofressentiment
AT gabijakrisciunaite grievancepoliticsanempiricalanalysisofangerthroughtheemotionalmechanismofressentiment