Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009
The storage and maintenance Minutes of Notary Deed is the responsibility of the notary as mandated in Article 1 Number 13 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives does not regulate the implementation...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Negeri Semarang
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Law and Legal Reform |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/article/view/58654 |
| _version_ | 1797988594711789568 |
|---|---|
| author | Nurwanty Setiawan Nynda Fatmawati Octarina |
| author_facet | Nurwanty Setiawan Nynda Fatmawati Octarina |
| author_sort | Nurwanty Setiawan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The storage and maintenance Minutes of Notary Deed is the responsibility of the notary as mandated in Article 1 Number 13 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives does not regulate the implementation of protocol archives as state archives, so that in this case it creates legal uncertainty for notaries in storing and maintaining. This research was conducted to find out whether the digitization system can be applied in the notary protocol and how the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive. This research is normative research with analytical descriptive nature. It can be concluded that the digitalization system for storing minutes of deeds with electronic media explicitly does not have any statutory provisions that regulate it. The existence of this norm vacuum has resulted in the legality of the activity of making and storing minutes of deed electronically doubtful if it is applied because it is considered not in accordance with the function and purpose of an authentic deed. As for the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive, in this case, it is linked based on the expiration time limit of the prosecution, which will ensure legal certainty until when a notary must be responsible for the deed he made, both accountability in criminal law and in civil law. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:06:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-136bf788e5bb4120a01800e96e30c097 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2715-0941 2715-0968 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:06:35Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Negeri Semarang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Law and Legal Reform |
| spelling | doaj.art-136bf788e5bb4120a01800e96e30c0972022-12-22T04:35:30ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangJournal of Law and Legal Reform2715-09412715-09682022-10-013454356610.15294/jllr.v3i4.5865458654Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009Nurwanty Setiawan0Nynda Fatmawati Octarina1Faculty of Law, Universitas NarotamaFaculty of Law, Universitas NarotamaThe storage and maintenance Minutes of Notary Deed is the responsibility of the notary as mandated in Article 1 Number 13 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives does not regulate the implementation of protocol archives as state archives, so that in this case it creates legal uncertainty for notaries in storing and maintaining. This research was conducted to find out whether the digitization system can be applied in the notary protocol and how the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive. This research is normative research with analytical descriptive nature. It can be concluded that the digitalization system for storing minutes of deeds with electronic media explicitly does not have any statutory provisions that regulate it. The existence of this norm vacuum has resulted in the legality of the activity of making and storing minutes of deed electronically doubtful if it is applied because it is considered not in accordance with the function and purpose of an authentic deed. As for the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive, in this case, it is linked based on the expiration time limit of the prosecution, which will ensure legal certainty until when a notary must be responsible for the deed he made, both accountability in criminal law and in civil law.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/article/view/58654legal certaintyelectronic digitalizationnotary protocolarchive act |
| spellingShingle | Nurwanty Setiawan Nynda Fatmawati Octarina Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009 Journal of Law and Legal Reform legal certainty electronic digitalization notary protocol archive act |
| title | Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009 |
| title_full | Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009 |
| title_fullStr | Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009 |
| title_short | Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009 |
| title_sort | legal uncertainty over notary protocols in law number 43 of 2009 |
| topic | legal certainty electronic digitalization notary protocol archive act |
| url | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/article/view/58654 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nurwantysetiawan legaluncertaintyovernotaryprotocolsinlawnumber43of2009 AT nyndafatmawatioctarina legaluncertaintyovernotaryprotocolsinlawnumber43of2009 |