The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde
Air cleaners with activated carbon (AC) filters for the adsorption of gaseous pollutants are often used to improve indoor air quality. As formaldehyde is a common and health-relevant indoor air pollutant, many testing standards for air cleaners, such as GB/T 18801:2015, require the cleaning efficacy...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Atmosphere |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/15/1/109 |
| _version_ | 1797344662100377600 |
|---|---|
| author | Stefan Schumacher Anna Caspari Ute Schneiderwind Katharina Staack Uta Sager Christof Asbach |
| author_facet | Stefan Schumacher Anna Caspari Ute Schneiderwind Katharina Staack Uta Sager Christof Asbach |
| author_sort | Stefan Schumacher |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Air cleaners with activated carbon (AC) filters for the adsorption of gaseous pollutants are often used to improve indoor air quality. As formaldehyde is a common and health-relevant indoor air pollutant, many testing standards for air cleaners, such as GB/T 18801:2015, require the cleaning efficacy to be tested with this substance. This often persuades manufacturers to optimize the employed filters specifically for formaldehyde. However, in regions where indoor formaldehyde levels are far below the guideline values, other gaseous pollutants might be more relevant. Thus, the question arises of whether the optimization for formaldehyde can have a negative impact on the adsorption of other gases. To address this question, the clean air delivery rate (CADR) of an air cleaner was determined for different test gases with either a standard AC filter or an AC filter modified for improved formaldehyde adsorption. Although the modified AC filter performed substantially better for formaldehyde, a strong reduction in the CADR was observed for toluene and nitrogen dioxide. This is a drawback for situations in which these gases are more problematic than formaldehyde. The findings suggest using either specialized filters for different applications or blends of different adsorbants to find the best compromise for the most relevant pollutants. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T11:05:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-137e4e99db2846a482b0ae08e1501858 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-4433 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T11:05:58Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmosphere |
| spelling | doaj.art-137e4e99db2846a482b0ae08e15018582024-01-26T15:02:28ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332024-01-0115110910.3390/atmos15010109The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of FormaldehydeStefan Schumacher0Anna Caspari1Ute Schneiderwind2Katharina Staack3Uta Sager4Christof Asbach5Institut für Umwelt & Energie, Technik & Analytik e.V. (IUTA), 47229 Duisburg, GermanyInstitut für Umwelt & Energie, Technik & Analytik e.V. (IUTA), 47229 Duisburg, GermanyInstitut für Umwelt & Energie, Technik & Analytik e.V. (IUTA), 47229 Duisburg, GermanyInstitut für Umwelt & Energie, Technik & Analytik e.V. (IUTA), 47229 Duisburg, GermanyInstitut für Umwelt & Energie, Technik & Analytik e.V. (IUTA), 47229 Duisburg, GermanyInstitut für Umwelt & Energie, Technik & Analytik e.V. (IUTA), 47229 Duisburg, GermanyAir cleaners with activated carbon (AC) filters for the adsorption of gaseous pollutants are often used to improve indoor air quality. As formaldehyde is a common and health-relevant indoor air pollutant, many testing standards for air cleaners, such as GB/T 18801:2015, require the cleaning efficacy to be tested with this substance. This often persuades manufacturers to optimize the employed filters specifically for formaldehyde. However, in regions where indoor formaldehyde levels are far below the guideline values, other gaseous pollutants might be more relevant. Thus, the question arises of whether the optimization for formaldehyde can have a negative impact on the adsorption of other gases. To address this question, the clean air delivery rate (CADR) of an air cleaner was determined for different test gases with either a standard AC filter or an AC filter modified for improved formaldehyde adsorption. Although the modified AC filter performed substantially better for formaldehyde, a strong reduction in the CADR was observed for toluene and nitrogen dioxide. This is a drawback for situations in which these gases are more problematic than formaldehyde. The findings suggest using either specialized filters for different applications or blends of different adsorbants to find the best compromise for the most relevant pollutants.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/15/1/109air cleaneradsorptionactivated carbonformaldehydeair quality |
| spellingShingle | Stefan Schumacher Anna Caspari Ute Schneiderwind Katharina Staack Uta Sager Christof Asbach The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde Atmosphere air cleaner adsorption activated carbon formaldehyde air quality |
| title | The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde |
| title_full | The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde |
| title_fullStr | The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde |
| title_short | The Drawback of Optimizing Air Cleaner Filters for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde |
| title_sort | drawback of optimizing air cleaner filters for the adsorption of formaldehyde |
| topic | air cleaner adsorption activated carbon formaldehyde air quality |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/15/1/109 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stefanschumacher thedrawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT annacaspari thedrawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT uteschneiderwind thedrawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT katharinastaack thedrawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT utasager thedrawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT christofasbach thedrawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT stefanschumacher drawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT annacaspari drawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT uteschneiderwind drawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT katharinastaack drawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT utasager drawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde AT christofasbach drawbackofoptimizingaircleanerfiltersfortheadsorptionofformaldehyde |