The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony Law

The modern Anglo-American common law tends toward a hardline stance on intoxication, typically not treating it as an excuse to a criminal charge but offering a few well-guarded exceptions, most notably the idea in some jurisdictions that intoxication may be invoked to negate specific intent given its...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elizabeth Papp Kamali
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 2022-10-01
Series:Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
Subjects:
_version_ 1811197393273618432
author Elizabeth Papp Kamali
author_facet Elizabeth Papp Kamali
author_sort Elizabeth Papp Kamali
collection DOAJ
description The modern Anglo-American common law tends toward a hardline stance on intoxication, typically not treating it as an excuse to a criminal charge but offering a few well-guarded exceptions, most notably the idea in some jurisdictions that intoxication may be invoked to negate specific intent given its deleterious effect on cognitive capacity. A similar ambivalence toward the intersection of intoxication and criminal responsibility may be found in early English felony law, which offered no formal, intoxication-based exceptions to liability, but nevertheless countenanced jurors exercising their prudential judgment to treat intoxication as either an inculpatory or exculpatory factor in particular cases. Medieval English felony law treated drunkenness similarly to anger, recognizing that both conditions – which could be intertwined – often traced their roots to condemnable character formation and long-cultivated habit, and yet could result in a person’s detachment from their capacity to reason and exercise self-control while under the influence. In the legal context, drunkenness was not equated with insanity, which was presumptively exculpatory, despite the fact that the two conditions could result in similar effects on a defendant’s observable behavior. Evidence from non-legal texts, including vernacular literature and guides for confessors, helps explain the concerns medieval English judges and jurors brought with them to the task of felony adjudication when faced with alcohol-laced facts, revealing a world in which tavern culture ensured alcohol’s omnipresence, but in which drunkenness was nevertheless not generally available as an excuse, partial or otherwise, for allegedly felonious behavior.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:13:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1388bec79e144e0386c139ff1e561578
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1619-4993
2195-9617
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:13:58Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
record_format Article
series Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
spelling doaj.art-1388bec79e144e0386c139ff1e5615782022-12-22T03:54:01ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172022-10-01302044http://dx.doi.org/10.12946/rg30/020-044The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony LawElizabeth Papp Kamali0Harvard Law SchoolThe modern Anglo-American common law tends toward a hardline stance on intoxication, typically not treating it as an excuse to a criminal charge but offering a few well-guarded exceptions, most notably the idea in some jurisdictions that intoxication may be invoked to negate specific intent given its deleterious effect on cognitive capacity. A similar ambivalence toward the intersection of intoxication and criminal responsibility may be found in early English felony law, which offered no formal, intoxication-based exceptions to liability, but nevertheless countenanced jurors exercising their prudential judgment to treat intoxication as either an inculpatory or exculpatory factor in particular cases. Medieval English felony law treated drunkenness similarly to anger, recognizing that both conditions – which could be intertwined – often traced their roots to condemnable character formation and long-cultivated habit, and yet could result in a person’s detachment from their capacity to reason and exercise self-control while under the influence. In the legal context, drunkenness was not equated with insanity, which was presumptively exculpatory, despite the fact that the two conditions could result in similar effects on a defendant’s observable behavior. Evidence from non-legal texts, including vernacular literature and guides for confessors, helps explain the concerns medieval English judges and jurors brought with them to the task of felony adjudication when faced with alcohol-laced facts, revealing a world in which tavern culture ensured alcohol’s omnipresence, but in which drunkenness was nevertheless not generally available as an excuse, partial or otherwise, for allegedly felonious behavior.intoxicationfelonymedieval england
spellingShingle Elizabeth Papp Kamali
The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony Law
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
intoxication
felony
medieval england
title The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony Law
title_full The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony Law
title_fullStr The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony Law
title_full_unstemmed The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony Law
title_short The Horrible Sepulture of Mannes Resoun: Intoxication and Medieval English Felony Law
title_sort horrible sepulture of mannes resoun intoxication and medieval english felony law
topic intoxication
felony
medieval england
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethpappkamali thehorriblesepultureofmannesresounintoxicationandmedievalenglishfelonylaw
AT elizabethpappkamali horriblesepultureofmannesresounintoxicationandmedievalenglishfelonylaw