A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping

The spatial mapping of social-ecological system (SES) archetypes constitutes a fundamental tool to operationalize the SES concept in empirical research. Approaches to detect, map, and characterize SES archetypes have evolved over the last decade towards more integrative and comparable perspectives g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Pacheco-Romero, María Vallejos, José M Paruelo, Domingo Alcaraz-Segura, M Trinidad Torres-García, María J. Salinas-Bonillo, Javier Cabello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5ded
_version_ 1797746989899710464
author Manuel Pacheco-Romero
María Vallejos
José M Paruelo
Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
M Trinidad Torres-García
María J. Salinas-Bonillo
Javier Cabello
author_facet Manuel Pacheco-Romero
María Vallejos
José M Paruelo
Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
M Trinidad Torres-García
María J. Salinas-Bonillo
Javier Cabello
author_sort Manuel Pacheco-Romero
collection DOAJ
description The spatial mapping of social-ecological system (SES) archetypes constitutes a fundamental tool to operationalize the SES concept in empirical research. Approaches to detect, map, and characterize SES archetypes have evolved over the last decade towards more integrative and comparable perspectives guided by SES conceptual frameworks and reference lists of variables. However, hardly any studies have investigated how to empirically identify the most relevant set of indicators to map the diversity of SESs. In this study, we propose a data-driven methodological routine based on multivariate statistical analysis to identify the most relevant indicators for mapping and characterizing SES archetypes in a particular region. Taking Andalusia (Spain) as a case study, we applied this methodological routine to 86 indicators representing multiple variables and dimensions of the SES. Additionally, we assessed how the empirical relevance of these indicators contributes to previous expert and empirical knowledge on key variables for characterizing SESs. We identified 29 key indicators that allowed us to map 15 SES archetypes encompassing natural, mosaic, agricultural, and urban systems, which uncovered contrasting land sharing and land sparing patterns throughout the territory. We found synergies but also disagreements between empirical and expert knowledge on the relevance of variables: agreement on their widespread relevance (32.7% of the variables, e.g. crop and livestock production, net primary productivity, population density); relevance conditioned by the context or the scale (16.3%, e.g. land protection, educational level); lack of agreement (20.4%, e.g. economic level, land tenure); need of further assessments due to the lack of expert or empirical knowledge (30.6%). Overall, our data-driven approach can contribute to more objective selection of relevant indicators for SES mapping, which may help to produce comparable and generalizable empirical knowledge on key variables for characterizing SESs, as well as to derive more representative descriptions and causal factor configurations in SES archetype analysis.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:45:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-139433df269d48ca9197108ebb5a9869
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:45:42Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-139433df269d48ca9197108ebb5a98692023-08-09T15:26:43ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262022-01-0117404501910.1088/1748-9326/ac5dedA data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mappingManuel Pacheco-Romero0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-4009María Vallejos1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-6458José M Paruelo2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8784-9431Domingo Alcaraz-Segura3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-4540M Trinidad Torres-García4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2244-1758María J. Salinas-Bonillo5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6931-6677Javier Cabello6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5123-964XAndalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change (CAESCG), University of Almería , Almería, Spain; Department of Biology and Geology, University of Almería , Almería, Spain; Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg , Lüneburg, GermanyInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), La Estanzuela , Departamento de Colonia, Uruguay; Cátedra de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, ArgentinaInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), La Estanzuela , Departamento de Colonia, Uruguay; Cátedra de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias, IECA, Universidad de la República , Montevideo, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección, IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, CONICET , Buenos Aires, ArgentinaAndalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change (CAESCG), University of Almería , Almería, Spain; Department of Botany, University of Granada , Granada, Spain; iecolab, Interuniversity Institute for Earth System Research (IISTA), University of Granada , Granada, SpainAndalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change (CAESCG), University of Almería , Almería, Spain; Department of Biology and Geology, University of Almería , Almería, SpainAndalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change (CAESCG), University of Almería , Almería, Spain; Department of Biology and Geology, University of Almería , Almería, SpainAndalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change (CAESCG), University of Almería , Almería, Spain; Department of Biology and Geology, University of Almería , Almería, SpainThe spatial mapping of social-ecological system (SES) archetypes constitutes a fundamental tool to operationalize the SES concept in empirical research. Approaches to detect, map, and characterize SES archetypes have evolved over the last decade towards more integrative and comparable perspectives guided by SES conceptual frameworks and reference lists of variables. However, hardly any studies have investigated how to empirically identify the most relevant set of indicators to map the diversity of SESs. In this study, we propose a data-driven methodological routine based on multivariate statistical analysis to identify the most relevant indicators for mapping and characterizing SES archetypes in a particular region. Taking Andalusia (Spain) as a case study, we applied this methodological routine to 86 indicators representing multiple variables and dimensions of the SES. Additionally, we assessed how the empirical relevance of these indicators contributes to previous expert and empirical knowledge on key variables for characterizing SESs. We identified 29 key indicators that allowed us to map 15 SES archetypes encompassing natural, mosaic, agricultural, and urban systems, which uncovered contrasting land sharing and land sparing patterns throughout the territory. We found synergies but also disagreements between empirical and expert knowledge on the relevance of variables: agreement on their widespread relevance (32.7% of the variables, e.g. crop and livestock production, net primary productivity, population density); relevance conditioned by the context or the scale (16.3%, e.g. land protection, educational level); lack of agreement (20.4%, e.g. economic level, land tenure); need of further assessments due to the lack of expert or empirical knowledge (30.6%). Overall, our data-driven approach can contribute to more objective selection of relevant indicators for SES mapping, which may help to produce comparable and generalizable empirical knowledge on key variables for characterizing SESs, as well as to derive more representative descriptions and causal factor configurations in SES archetype analysis.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5dedcoupled human and natural systemsessential social-ecological system variableshuman-environment interactionslong-term social-ecological researchLTSERrandom forest
spellingShingle Manuel Pacheco-Romero
María Vallejos
José M Paruelo
Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
M Trinidad Torres-García
María J. Salinas-Bonillo
Javier Cabello
A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
Environmental Research Letters
coupled human and natural systems
essential social-ecological system variables
human-environment interactions
long-term social-ecological research
LTSER
random forest
title A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
title_full A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
title_fullStr A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
title_full_unstemmed A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
title_short A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
title_sort data driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social ecological system archetype mapping
topic coupled human and natural systems
essential social-ecological system variables
human-environment interactions
long-term social-ecological research
LTSER
random forest
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5ded
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelpachecoromero adatadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT mariavallejos adatadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT josemparuelo adatadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT domingoalcarazsegura adatadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT mtrinidadtorresgarcia adatadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT mariajsalinasbonillo adatadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT javiercabello adatadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT manuelpachecoromero datadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT mariavallejos datadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT josemparuelo datadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT domingoalcarazsegura datadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT mtrinidadtorresgarcia datadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT mariajsalinasbonillo datadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping
AT javiercabello datadrivenmethodologicalroutinetoidentifykeyindicatorsforsocialecologicalsystemarchetypemapping