Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School Building

Thermal refurbishment of buildings results in certain energy, financial, and environmental effects. Such investments are financially supported in Poland after meeting the legally defined conditions of thermal protection and energy consumption. This paper presents a complex thermal modernization of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piotr Michalak, Krzysztof Szczotka, Jakub Szymiczek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1973
_version_ 1797538941710106624
author Piotr Michalak
Krzysztof Szczotka
Jakub Szymiczek
author_facet Piotr Michalak
Krzysztof Szczotka
Jakub Szymiczek
author_sort Piotr Michalak
collection DOAJ
description Thermal refurbishment of buildings results in certain energy, financial, and environmental effects. Such investments are financially supported in Poland after meeting the legally defined conditions of thermal protection and energy consumption. This paper presents a complex thermal modernization of a school building, performed by following Polish regulations. A detailed description of the studied object was given, and the calculation procedure was described. Then an optimal variant of an investment and an ex-post analysis were described. Simple payback time (SPBT) of modernization measures was from 15.8 years (insulation of the ceiling under the unheated attic) to 87 years for insulation of the wooden external wall, with 35.6 years for the whole project, which is shorter than the predicted lifespan of the whole building (50–70 years). Annual calculated heating demand decreased from 464.78 to 168.73 GJ, resulting in the primary energy consumption indicator (EP) of 484.44 and 129.46 kWh/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Thermal refurbishment with the replacement of an old boiler into a new wood-pellet one resulted in a significant reduction of SO<sub>2</sub> and dust emissions from 451 to 27.5 kg and from 399 to 13 kg, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:38:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-139b1b765d964744831c2f8558fb1046
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:38:20Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-139b1b765d964744831c2f8558fb10462023-11-21T14:02:43ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-04-01147197310.3390/en14071973Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School BuildingPiotr Michalak0Krzysztof Szczotka1Jakub Szymiczek2Department of Power Systems and Environmental Protection Facilities, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, PolandDepartment of Power Systems and Environmental Protection Facilities, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, PolandDepartment of Power Systems and Environmental Protection Facilities, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, PolandThermal refurbishment of buildings results in certain energy, financial, and environmental effects. Such investments are financially supported in Poland after meeting the legally defined conditions of thermal protection and energy consumption. This paper presents a complex thermal modernization of a school building, performed by following Polish regulations. A detailed description of the studied object was given, and the calculation procedure was described. Then an optimal variant of an investment and an ex-post analysis were described. Simple payback time (SPBT) of modernization measures was from 15.8 years (insulation of the ceiling under the unheated attic) to 87 years for insulation of the wooden external wall, with 35.6 years for the whole project, which is shorter than the predicted lifespan of the whole building (50–70 years). Annual calculated heating demand decreased from 464.78 to 168.73 GJ, resulting in the primary energy consumption indicator (EP) of 484.44 and 129.46 kWh/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Thermal refurbishment with the replacement of an old boiler into a new wood-pellet one resulted in a significant reduction of SO<sub>2</sub> and dust emissions from 451 to 27.5 kg and from 399 to 13 kg, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1973thermal modernizationenergy auditSPBTlifespanprimary energyusable energy
spellingShingle Piotr Michalak
Krzysztof Szczotka
Jakub Szymiczek
Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School Building
Energies
thermal modernization
energy audit
SPBT
lifespan
primary energy
usable energy
title Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School Building
title_full Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School Building
title_fullStr Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School Building
title_full_unstemmed Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School Building
title_short Energy Effectiveness or Economic Profitability? A Case Study of Thermal Modernization of a School Building
title_sort energy effectiveness or economic profitability a case study of thermal modernization of a school building
topic thermal modernization
energy audit
SPBT
lifespan
primary energy
usable energy
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1973
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrmichalak energyeffectivenessoreconomicprofitabilityacasestudyofthermalmodernizationofaschoolbuilding
AT krzysztofszczotka energyeffectivenessoreconomicprofitabilityacasestudyofthermalmodernizationofaschoolbuilding
AT jakubszymiczek energyeffectivenessoreconomicprofitabilityacasestudyofthermalmodernizationofaschoolbuilding