The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables
Force plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this stud...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-05-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4820 |
_version_ | 1797598357066088448 |
---|---|
author | Andrew J. Badby Peter D. Mundy Paul Comfort Jason P. Lake John J. McMahon |
author_facet | Andrew J. Badby Peter D. Mundy Paul Comfort Jason P. Lake John J. McMahon |
author_sort | Andrew J. Badby |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Force plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the HD wireless dual force plate hardware for assessing vertical jumps. During a single testing session, the HD force plates were placed directly atop two adjacent Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc. in-ground force plates (the “gold standard”) to simultaneously collect vertical ground reaction forces produced by 20 participants (27 ± 6 years, 85 ± 14 kg, 176.5 ± 9.23 cm) during the countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests (1000 Hz). Agreement between force plate systems was determined via ordinary least products regression using bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. No bias was present between the two force plate systems for any of the CMJ and DJ variables, except DJ peak braking force (proportional bias) and DJ peak braking power (fixed and proportional bias). The HD system may be considered a valid alternative to the industry gold standard for assessing vertical jumps because fixed or proportional bias was identified for none of the CMJ variables (n = 17) and only 2 out of 18 DJ variables. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T03:20:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-139c29e3ebcf4e4ab3ea400ac5f1ad7a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1424-8220 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T03:20:05Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Sensors |
spelling | doaj.art-139c29e3ebcf4e4ab3ea400ac5f1ad7a2023-11-18T03:13:05ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-05-012310482010.3390/s23104820The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump VariablesAndrew J. Badby0Peter D. Mundy1Paul Comfort2Jason P. Lake3John J. McMahon4Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UKHawkin Dynamics, Inc., Westbrook, ME 04092, USACentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UKHawkin Dynamics, Inc., Westbrook, ME 04092, USACentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UKForce plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the HD wireless dual force plate hardware for assessing vertical jumps. During a single testing session, the HD force plates were placed directly atop two adjacent Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc. in-ground force plates (the “gold standard”) to simultaneously collect vertical ground reaction forces produced by 20 participants (27 ± 6 years, 85 ± 14 kg, 176.5 ± 9.23 cm) during the countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests (1000 Hz). Agreement between force plate systems was determined via ordinary least products regression using bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. No bias was present between the two force plate systems for any of the CMJ and DJ variables, except DJ peak braking force (proportional bias) and DJ peak braking power (fixed and proportional bias). The HD system may be considered a valid alternative to the industry gold standard for assessing vertical jumps because fixed or proportional bias was identified for none of the CMJ variables (n = 17) and only 2 out of 18 DJ variables.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4820wireless dual force plate systemforce–timevertical jumphardwareconcurrent validityagreement |
spellingShingle | Andrew J. Badby Peter D. Mundy Paul Comfort Jason P. Lake John J. McMahon The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables Sensors wireless dual force plate system force–time vertical jump hardware concurrent validity agreement |
title | The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables |
title_full | The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables |
title_fullStr | The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables |
title_full_unstemmed | The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables |
title_short | The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables |
title_sort | validity of hawkin dynamics wireless dual force plates for measuring countermovement jump and drop jump variables |
topic | wireless dual force plate system force–time vertical jump hardware concurrent validity agreement |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4820 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andrewjbadby thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT peterdmundy thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT paulcomfort thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT jasonplake thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT johnjmcmahon thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT andrewjbadby validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT peterdmundy validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT paulcomfort validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT jasonplake validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables AT johnjmcmahon validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables |