The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables

Force plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew J. Badby, Peter D. Mundy, Paul Comfort, Jason P. Lake, John J. McMahon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4820
_version_ 1797598357066088448
author Andrew J. Badby
Peter D. Mundy
Paul Comfort
Jason P. Lake
John J. McMahon
author_facet Andrew J. Badby
Peter D. Mundy
Paul Comfort
Jason P. Lake
John J. McMahon
author_sort Andrew J. Badby
collection DOAJ
description Force plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the HD wireless dual force plate hardware for assessing vertical jumps. During a single testing session, the HD force plates were placed directly atop two adjacent Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc. in-ground force plates (the “gold standard”) to simultaneously collect vertical ground reaction forces produced by 20 participants (27 ± 6 years, 85 ± 14 kg, 176.5 ± 9.23 cm) during the countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests (1000 Hz). Agreement between force plate systems was determined via ordinary least products regression using bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. No bias was present between the two force plate systems for any of the CMJ and DJ variables, except DJ peak braking force (proportional bias) and DJ peak braking power (fixed and proportional bias). The HD system may be considered a valid alternative to the industry gold standard for assessing vertical jumps because fixed or proportional bias was identified for none of the CMJ variables (n = 17) and only 2 out of 18 DJ variables.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:20:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-139c29e3ebcf4e4ab3ea400ac5f1ad7a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:20:05Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-139c29e3ebcf4e4ab3ea400ac5f1ad7a2023-11-18T03:13:05ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-05-012310482010.3390/s23104820The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump VariablesAndrew J. Badby0Peter D. Mundy1Paul Comfort2Jason P. Lake3John J. McMahon4Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UKHawkin Dynamics, Inc., Westbrook, ME 04092, USACentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UKHawkin Dynamics, Inc., Westbrook, ME 04092, USACentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UKForce plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the HD wireless dual force plate hardware for assessing vertical jumps. During a single testing session, the HD force plates were placed directly atop two adjacent Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc. in-ground force plates (the “gold standard”) to simultaneously collect vertical ground reaction forces produced by 20 participants (27 ± 6 years, 85 ± 14 kg, 176.5 ± 9.23 cm) during the countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests (1000 Hz). Agreement between force plate systems was determined via ordinary least products regression using bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. No bias was present between the two force plate systems for any of the CMJ and DJ variables, except DJ peak braking force (proportional bias) and DJ peak braking power (fixed and proportional bias). The HD system may be considered a valid alternative to the industry gold standard for assessing vertical jumps because fixed or proportional bias was identified for none of the CMJ variables (n = 17) and only 2 out of 18 DJ variables.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4820wireless dual force plate systemforce–timevertical jumphardwareconcurrent validityagreement
spellingShingle Andrew J. Badby
Peter D. Mundy
Paul Comfort
Jason P. Lake
John J. McMahon
The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables
Sensors
wireless dual force plate system
force–time
vertical jump
hardware
concurrent validity
agreement
title The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables
title_full The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables
title_fullStr The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables
title_full_unstemmed The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables
title_short The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables
title_sort validity of hawkin dynamics wireless dual force plates for measuring countermovement jump and drop jump variables
topic wireless dual force plate system
force–time
vertical jump
hardware
concurrent validity
agreement
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4820
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewjbadby thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT peterdmundy thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT paulcomfort thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT jasonplake thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT johnjmcmahon thevalidityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT andrewjbadby validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT peterdmundy validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT paulcomfort validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT jasonplake validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables
AT johnjmcmahon validityofhawkindynamicswirelessdualforceplatesformeasuringcountermovementjumpanddropjumpvariables