Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Animal experiments have confirmed that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) can reduce hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuries (HIRIs), significantly improving early tissue perfusion and oxygenation of the residual liver after resections, accelerating surgical prognoses, and impr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chun Tian, Aihua Wang, He Huang, Youwan Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-03-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02506-9
_version_ 1797233300815740928
author Chun Tian
Aihua Wang
He Huang
Youwan Chen
author_facet Chun Tian
Aihua Wang
He Huang
Youwan Chen
author_sort Chun Tian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Animal experiments have confirmed that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) can reduce hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuries (HIRIs), significantly improving early tissue perfusion and oxygenation of the residual liver after resections, accelerating surgical prognoses, and improving survival rates. However, there is still controversy over the role of RIPC in relieving HIRI in clinical studies, which warrants clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the beneficial effects and applicability of RIPC in hepatectomy and to provide evidence-based information for clinical decision-making. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of RIPC interventions were collected, comparing RIPC to no preconditioning in patients undergoing hepatectomies. This search spanned from database inception to January 2024. Data were extracted independently by two researchers according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), and albumin (ALB) levels. The secondary outcomes assessed included duration of surgery and Pringle, length of postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, indocyanine green (ICG) clearance, hepatocyte apoptosis index, postoperative complications, and others. Results Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 865 patients (428 in the RIPC group and 437 in the control group). ALT levels in the RIPC group were lower than those in the control group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (WMD = − 59.24, 95% CI: − 115.04 to − 3.45; P = 0.04) and POD 3 (WMD = − 27.47, 95% CI: − 52.26 to − 2.68; P = 0.03). However, heterogeneities were significant (I 2  = 89% and I 2  = 78%), and ALT levels on POD 3 were unstable based on a sensitivity analysis. AST levels on POD 1 in the RIPC group were lower than those in the control group (WMD = − 50.03, 95% CI: - 94.35 to − 5.71; P = 0.03), but heterogeneity was also significant (I 2  = 81%). A subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in ALT and AST levels on POD 1 between groups, regardless of whether the Pringle maneuver or propofol was used for anesthesia (induction only or induction and maintenance, P > 0.05). The remaining outcome indicators were not statistically significant or could not be analyzed due to lack of sufficient data. Conclusion RIPC has some short-term liver protective effects on HIRIs during hepatectomies. However, there is still insufficient evidence to encourage its routine use to improve clinical outcomes. Trial registration The protocol of this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022333383).
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:13:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-139e214b10324d59a41607b42bb8b055
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2253
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:13:59Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-139e214b10324d59a41607b42bb8b0552024-03-31T11:33:25ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532024-03-0124111310.1186/s12871-024-02506-9Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysisChun Tian0Aihua Wang1He Huang2Youwan Chen3Department of Anesthesiology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Chongqing Yongchuan District People’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Chongqing Yongchuan District People’s HospitalAbstract Background Animal experiments have confirmed that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) can reduce hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuries (HIRIs), significantly improving early tissue perfusion and oxygenation of the residual liver after resections, accelerating surgical prognoses, and improving survival rates. However, there is still controversy over the role of RIPC in relieving HIRI in clinical studies, which warrants clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the beneficial effects and applicability of RIPC in hepatectomy and to provide evidence-based information for clinical decision-making. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of RIPC interventions were collected, comparing RIPC to no preconditioning in patients undergoing hepatectomies. This search spanned from database inception to January 2024. Data were extracted independently by two researchers according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), and albumin (ALB) levels. The secondary outcomes assessed included duration of surgery and Pringle, length of postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, indocyanine green (ICG) clearance, hepatocyte apoptosis index, postoperative complications, and others. Results Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 865 patients (428 in the RIPC group and 437 in the control group). ALT levels in the RIPC group were lower than those in the control group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (WMD = − 59.24, 95% CI: − 115.04 to − 3.45; P = 0.04) and POD 3 (WMD = − 27.47, 95% CI: − 52.26 to − 2.68; P = 0.03). However, heterogeneities were significant (I 2  = 89% and I 2  = 78%), and ALT levels on POD 3 were unstable based on a sensitivity analysis. AST levels on POD 1 in the RIPC group were lower than those in the control group (WMD = − 50.03, 95% CI: - 94.35 to − 5.71; P = 0.03), but heterogeneity was also significant (I 2  = 81%). A subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in ALT and AST levels on POD 1 between groups, regardless of whether the Pringle maneuver or propofol was used for anesthesia (induction only or induction and maintenance, P > 0.05). The remaining outcome indicators were not statistically significant or could not be analyzed due to lack of sufficient data. Conclusion RIPC has some short-term liver protective effects on HIRIs during hepatectomies. However, there is still insufficient evidence to encourage its routine use to improve clinical outcomes. Trial registration The protocol of this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022333383).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02506-9Remote ischemic preconditioningIschemia-reperfusion injuryHepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuryHepatectomyLiver resection
spellingShingle Chun Tian
Aihua Wang
He Huang
Youwan Chen
Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Anesthesiology
Remote ischemic preconditioning
Ischemia-reperfusion injury
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury
Hepatectomy
Liver resection
title Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Remote ischemic preconditioning
Ischemia-reperfusion injury
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury
Hepatectomy
Liver resection
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02506-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chuntian effectsofremoteischemicpreconditioninginhepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aihuawang effectsofremoteischemicpreconditioninginhepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hehuang effectsofremoteischemicpreconditioninginhepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT youwanchen effectsofremoteischemicpreconditioninginhepatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis