Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools

Abstract Purpose This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy. Design and Methods In this cross‐sectional study (N = 155), sensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angela Hamidia, Farzan Kheirkhah, Mohammad Chehrazi, Zahra Basirat, Reza Ghadimi, Shahnaz Barat, Pim Cuijpers, Elizabeth O'Connor, Seyyedeh Mahboubeh Mirtabar, Mahbobeh Faramarzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-03-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.518
Description
Summary:Abstract Purpose This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy. Design and Methods In this cross‐sectional study (N = 155), sensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Brief Symptom Inventory 53‐items (BSI‐53), and the BSI‐18 were computed with respect to having a psychiatric diagnosis based on the clinical interview. Results The usual cutoffs (≥13 for EPDS, T‐score of 63 for BSI‐53) demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy. The optimal thresholds were computed for EPDS cutoff of 6.5, GSI = 0.47 for BSI‐53, and GSI = 0.5 for BSI‐18. Practice Implications The use of psychological tools among pregnant women with high‐risk pregnancy may need to be modified in order to accurately identify psychiatric disorders.
ISSN:2398-8835