Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836

This paper investigates the use of the anomalous term ‘man robbery’ in historical records relating to convict women in New South Wales. We question its accuracy as a criminal offence and conclude that its use in the 1830s was an administrative code that summarized an assessment not only of the women...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carol Liston, Kathrine M. Reynolds
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Societies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/48
_version_ 1797563695608365056
author Carol Liston
Kathrine M. Reynolds
author_facet Carol Liston
Kathrine M. Reynolds
author_sort Carol Liston
collection DOAJ
description This paper investigates the use of the anomalous term ‘man robbery’ in historical records relating to convict women in New South Wales. We question its accuracy as a criminal offence and conclude that its use in the 1830s was an administrative code that summarized an assessment not only of the women’s criminality but also of their morality. Its use in the historical records has been accepted uncritically by modern historians. The anomaly was identified through a large-scale study of these records. Often used to trace the histories of individual women for genealogical research, recurring patterns in the records are more noticeable when considering the crimes of some 5000 women transported to New South Wales, especially when their court records held in Britain are compared with those held in Australia. Evidence has emerged that the criminality of the women has been reduced by this gendered criminal offence. Inconsistency in the application of the term ‘man robbery’ led us to question it accuracy. Violence and participation in gangs were airbrushed from the records by the use of a term that implied that the women’s crimes related to their sexuality rather than their skills as criminals.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:46:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-13b7d2490f4f42bfa44d922cfac48062
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4698
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:46:07Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Societies
spelling doaj.art-13b7d2490f4f42bfa44d922cfac480622023-11-20T05:27:02ZengMDPI AGSocieties2075-46982020-06-011034810.3390/soc10030048Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836Carol Liston0Kathrine M. Reynolds1Humanities and Communication Arts, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaArts and Social Sciences, Department of History, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, AustraliaThis paper investigates the use of the anomalous term ‘man robbery’ in historical records relating to convict women in New South Wales. We question its accuracy as a criminal offence and conclude that its use in the 1830s was an administrative code that summarized an assessment not only of the women’s criminality but also of their morality. Its use in the historical records has been accepted uncritically by modern historians. The anomaly was identified through a large-scale study of these records. Often used to trace the histories of individual women for genealogical research, recurring patterns in the records are more noticeable when considering the crimes of some 5000 women transported to New South Wales, especially when their court records held in Britain are compared with those held in Australia. Evidence has emerged that the criminality of the women has been reduced by this gendered criminal offence. Inconsistency in the application of the term ‘man robbery’ led us to question it accuracy. Violence and participation in gangs were airbrushed from the records by the use of a term that implied that the women’s crimes related to their sexuality rather than their skills as criminals.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/48womencrimeAustraliaconvictmorality
spellingShingle Carol Liston
Kathrine M. Reynolds
Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836
Societies
women
crime
Australia
convict
morality
title Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836
title_full Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836
title_fullStr Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836
title_full_unstemmed Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836
title_short Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836
title_sort man robbery a gender signifier in convict australia 1827 1836
topic women
crime
Australia
convict
morality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/48
work_keys_str_mv AT carolliston manrobberyagendersignifierinconvictaustralia18271836
AT kathrinemreynolds manrobberyagendersignifierinconvictaustralia18271836