Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, tungiasis is endemic in some resource-poor communities where various domestic and sylvatic animals act as reservoirs for this zoonosis. To determine the effect of control measures on the prevalence and intensity of infestation of human and animal tungiasis, a repeated cross-se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Pilger, Stefan Schwalfenberg, Jörg Heukelbach, Lars Witt, Norbert Mencke, Adak Khakban, Hermann Feldmeier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-01-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2565488?pdf=render
_version_ 1819058525994745856
author Daniel Pilger
Stefan Schwalfenberg
Jörg Heukelbach
Lars Witt
Norbert Mencke
Adak Khakban
Hermann Feldmeier
author_facet Daniel Pilger
Stefan Schwalfenberg
Jörg Heukelbach
Lars Witt
Norbert Mencke
Adak Khakban
Hermann Feldmeier
author_sort Daniel Pilger
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: In Brazil, tungiasis is endemic in some resource-poor communities where various domestic and sylvatic animals act as reservoirs for this zoonosis. To determine the effect of control measures on the prevalence and intensity of infestation of human and animal tungiasis, a repeated cross-sectional survey with intervention was carried out. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a traditional fishing community in Northeast Brazil, humans and reservoir animals were treated, and premise-spraying using an insecticide was done, while a second fishing community served as a control. Both communities were followed up 10 times during a 12-month period. At baseline, prevalence of tungiasis was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35%-51%) and 37% (95% CI: 31%-43%) in control and intervention villages, respectively. During the study, prevalence of tungiasis dropped to 10% (95% CI: 8%-13%; p<0.001) in the intervention village, while the prevalence remained at a high level in the control village. However, after one year, at the end of the study, in both communities the prevalence of the infestation had reached pre-intervention levels. Whereas the intensity of infestation was significantly reduced in the intervention community (p<0.001), and remained low at the end of the study (p<0.001), it did not change in the control village. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study shows that a reduction of prevalence and intensity of infestation is possible, but in impoverished communities a long-lasting reduction of disease occurrence can only be achieved by the regular treatment of infested humans, the elimination of animal reservoirs, and, likely, through environmental changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN27670575.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T13:56:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-13bca421ef09487294115f90e5a80ae2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-2735
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T13:56:36Z
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
spelling doaj.art-13bca421ef09487294115f90e5a80ae22022-12-21T19:01:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27352008-01-01210e32410.1371/journal.pntd.0000324Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.Daniel PilgerStefan SchwalfenbergJörg HeukelbachLars WittNorbert MenckeAdak KhakbanHermann FeldmeierBACKGROUND: In Brazil, tungiasis is endemic in some resource-poor communities where various domestic and sylvatic animals act as reservoirs for this zoonosis. To determine the effect of control measures on the prevalence and intensity of infestation of human and animal tungiasis, a repeated cross-sectional survey with intervention was carried out. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a traditional fishing community in Northeast Brazil, humans and reservoir animals were treated, and premise-spraying using an insecticide was done, while a second fishing community served as a control. Both communities were followed up 10 times during a 12-month period. At baseline, prevalence of tungiasis was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35%-51%) and 37% (95% CI: 31%-43%) in control and intervention villages, respectively. During the study, prevalence of tungiasis dropped to 10% (95% CI: 8%-13%; p<0.001) in the intervention village, while the prevalence remained at a high level in the control village. However, after one year, at the end of the study, in both communities the prevalence of the infestation had reached pre-intervention levels. Whereas the intensity of infestation was significantly reduced in the intervention community (p<0.001), and remained low at the end of the study (p<0.001), it did not change in the control village. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study shows that a reduction of prevalence and intensity of infestation is possible, but in impoverished communities a long-lasting reduction of disease occurrence can only be achieved by the regular treatment of infested humans, the elimination of animal reservoirs, and, likely, through environmental changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN27670575.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2565488?pdf=render
spellingShingle Daniel Pilger
Stefan Schwalfenberg
Jörg Heukelbach
Lars Witt
Norbert Mencke
Adak Khakban
Hermann Feldmeier
Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
title Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.
title_full Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.
title_fullStr Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.
title_full_unstemmed Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.
title_short Controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community: an intervention study.
title_sort controlling tungiasis in an impoverished community an intervention study
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2565488?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT danielpilger controllingtungiasisinanimpoverishedcommunityaninterventionstudy
AT stefanschwalfenberg controllingtungiasisinanimpoverishedcommunityaninterventionstudy
AT jorgheukelbach controllingtungiasisinanimpoverishedcommunityaninterventionstudy
AT larswitt controllingtungiasisinanimpoverishedcommunityaninterventionstudy
AT norbertmencke controllingtungiasisinanimpoverishedcommunityaninterventionstudy
AT adakkhakban controllingtungiasisinanimpoverishedcommunityaninterventionstudy
AT hermannfeldmeier controllingtungiasisinanimpoverishedcommunityaninterventionstudy