Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty Wind

Northern China experienced a severe sand and dust storm (SDS) on 14/15 March 2021. It was difficult to simulate this severe SDS event accurately. This study compared the performances of three dust-emission schemes on simulating PM<sub>10</sub> concentration during this SDS event by imple...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jikang Wang, Bihui Zhang, Hengde Zhang, Cong Hua, Linchang An, Hailin Gui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/1/108
_version_ 1827666715937341440
author Jikang Wang
Bihui Zhang
Hengde Zhang
Cong Hua
Linchang An
Hailin Gui
author_facet Jikang Wang
Bihui Zhang
Hengde Zhang
Cong Hua
Linchang An
Hailin Gui
author_sort Jikang Wang
collection DOAJ
description Northern China experienced a severe sand and dust storm (SDS) on 14/15 March 2021. It was difficult to simulate this severe SDS event accurately. This study compared the performances of three dust-emission schemes on simulating PM<sub>10</sub> concentration during this SDS event by implementing three vertical dust flux parameterizations in the Comprehensive Air-Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) model. Additionally, a statistical gusty-wind model was implemented in the dust-emission scheme, and it was used to quantify the gusty-wind contribution to dust emissions and peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentration. As a result, the LS scheme (Lu and Shao 1999) produced the minimum errors for peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations, the MB scheme (Marticorena and Bergametti 1995) underestimated the PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations by 70–90%, and the KOK scheme (Kok et al. 2014) overestimated PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations by 10–50% in most areas. The gusty-wind model could reasonably reproduce the probability density function of 2-min wind speeds. There were 5–40% more dust-emission flux and 5–40% more peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations generated by the gusty wind than the hourly wind in the dust-source regions. The increase of peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentration caused by gusty wind in the non-dust-source regions was higher than in the dust-source regions, with 10–50%. Implementing the gusty-wind model could help improve the LS scheme’s performance in simulating PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations of this severe SDS event. More work is still needed to investigate the reliability of the gusty-wind model and LS scheme on various SDS events.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:55:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-13dcd1fa2a1e4acf97f86ad6f54e6ca6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:55:37Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-13dcd1fa2a1e4acf97f86ad6f54e6ca62023-11-23T12:57:16ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332022-01-0113110810.3390/atmos13010108Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty WindJikang Wang0Bihui Zhang1Hengde Zhang2Cong Hua3Linchang An4Hailin Gui5National Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, ChinaNational Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, ChinaNational Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, ChinaNational Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, ChinaNational Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, ChinaNational Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, ChinaNorthern China experienced a severe sand and dust storm (SDS) on 14/15 March 2021. It was difficult to simulate this severe SDS event accurately. This study compared the performances of three dust-emission schemes on simulating PM<sub>10</sub> concentration during this SDS event by implementing three vertical dust flux parameterizations in the Comprehensive Air-Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) model. Additionally, a statistical gusty-wind model was implemented in the dust-emission scheme, and it was used to quantify the gusty-wind contribution to dust emissions and peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentration. As a result, the LS scheme (Lu and Shao 1999) produced the minimum errors for peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations, the MB scheme (Marticorena and Bergametti 1995) underestimated the PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations by 70–90%, and the KOK scheme (Kok et al. 2014) overestimated PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations by 10–50% in most areas. The gusty-wind model could reasonably reproduce the probability density function of 2-min wind speeds. There were 5–40% more dust-emission flux and 5–40% more peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations generated by the gusty wind than the hourly wind in the dust-source regions. The increase of peak PM<sub>10</sub> concentration caused by gusty wind in the non-dust-source regions was higher than in the dust-source regions, with 10–50%. Implementing the gusty-wind model could help improve the LS scheme’s performance in simulating PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations of this severe SDS event. More work is still needed to investigate the reliability of the gusty-wind model and LS scheme on various SDS events.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/1/108sand and dust stormsgusty-wind modelvertical dust flux parameterizationsCAMx
spellingShingle Jikang Wang
Bihui Zhang
Hengde Zhang
Cong Hua
Linchang An
Hailin Gui
Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty Wind
Atmosphere
sand and dust storms
gusty-wind model
vertical dust flux parameterizations
CAMx
title Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty Wind
title_full Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty Wind
title_fullStr Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty Wind
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty Wind
title_short Simulation of a Severe Sand and Dust Storm Event in March 2021 in Northern China: Dust Emission Schemes Comparison and the Role of Gusty Wind
title_sort simulation of a severe sand and dust storm event in march 2021 in northern china dust emission schemes comparison and the role of gusty wind
topic sand and dust storms
gusty-wind model
vertical dust flux parameterizations
CAMx
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/1/108
work_keys_str_mv AT jikangwang simulationofaseveresandandduststormeventinmarch2021innorthernchinadustemissionschemescomparisonandtheroleofgustywind
AT bihuizhang simulationofaseveresandandduststormeventinmarch2021innorthernchinadustemissionschemescomparisonandtheroleofgustywind
AT hengdezhang simulationofaseveresandandduststormeventinmarch2021innorthernchinadustemissionschemescomparisonandtheroleofgustywind
AT conghua simulationofaseveresandandduststormeventinmarch2021innorthernchinadustemissionschemescomparisonandtheroleofgustywind
AT linchangan simulationofaseveresandandduststormeventinmarch2021innorthernchinadustemissionschemescomparisonandtheroleofgustywind
AT hailingui simulationofaseveresandandduststormeventinmarch2021innorthernchinadustemissionschemescomparisonandtheroleofgustywind