The Mathematics of Catastrophe

A mathematical description of catastrophe in complex systems modeled as a network is presented with emphasis on network topology and its relationship to risk and resilience. We present mathematical formulas for computing risk, resilience, and likelihood of faults in nodes/links of network models of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ted Gyle Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:AppliedMath
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9909/2/3/28
_version_ 1797466023094386688
author Ted Gyle Lewis
author_facet Ted Gyle Lewis
author_sort Ted Gyle Lewis
collection DOAJ
description A mathematical description of catastrophe in complex systems modeled as a network is presented with emphasis on network topology and its relationship to risk and resilience. We present mathematical formulas for computing risk, resilience, and likelihood of faults in nodes/links of network models of complex systems and illustrate the application of the formulas to simulation of catastrophic failure. This model is not related to nonlinear “Catastrophe theory” by René Thom, E.C. Zeeman and others. Instead, we present a strictly probabilistic network model for estimating risk and resilience—two useful metrics used in practice. We propose a mathematical model of exceedance probability, risk, and resilience and show that these properties depend wholly on vulnerability, consequence, and properties of the network representation of the complex system. We use simulation of the network under simulated stress causing one or more nodes/links to fail, to extract properties of risk and resilience. In this paper two types of stress are considered: viral cascades and flow cascades. One unified definition of risk, MPL, is proposed, and three kinds of resilience illustrated—viral cascading, blocking node/link, and flow resilience. The principal contributions of this work are new equations for risk and resilience and measures of resilience based on vulnerability of individual nodes/links and network topology expressed in terms of spectral radius, bushy, and branchy metrics. We apply the model to a variety of networks—hypothetical and real—and show that network topology needs to be included in any definition of network risk and resilience. In addition, we show how simulations can identify likely future faults due to viral and flow cascades. Simulations of this nature are useful to the practitioner.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:29:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-13e71fc4e6d5414b815fa8c0320f42a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-9909
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:29:58Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series AppliedMath
spelling doaj.art-13e71fc4e6d5414b815fa8c0320f42a62023-11-24T07:33:10ZengMDPI AGAppliedMath2673-99092022-09-012348050010.3390/appliedmath2030028The Mathematics of CatastropheTed Gyle Lewis0Naval Postgraduate School (ret), Monterey, CA 93943, USAA mathematical description of catastrophe in complex systems modeled as a network is presented with emphasis on network topology and its relationship to risk and resilience. We present mathematical formulas for computing risk, resilience, and likelihood of faults in nodes/links of network models of complex systems and illustrate the application of the formulas to simulation of catastrophic failure. This model is not related to nonlinear “Catastrophe theory” by René Thom, E.C. Zeeman and others. Instead, we present a strictly probabilistic network model for estimating risk and resilience—two useful metrics used in practice. We propose a mathematical model of exceedance probability, risk, and resilience and show that these properties depend wholly on vulnerability, consequence, and properties of the network representation of the complex system. We use simulation of the network under simulated stress causing one or more nodes/links to fail, to extract properties of risk and resilience. In this paper two types of stress are considered: viral cascades and flow cascades. One unified definition of risk, MPL, is proposed, and three kinds of resilience illustrated—viral cascading, blocking node/link, and flow resilience. The principal contributions of this work are new equations for risk and resilience and measures of resilience based on vulnerability of individual nodes/links and network topology expressed in terms of spectral radius, bushy, and branchy metrics. We apply the model to a variety of networks—hypothetical and real—and show that network topology needs to be included in any definition of network risk and resilience. In addition, we show how simulations can identify likely future faults due to viral and flow cascades. Simulations of this nature are useful to the practitioner.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9909/2/3/28risk and resilience in complex infrastructureconsequenceexceedance probabilityfractal dimensionnetwork simulation modelsblocking nodes/links
spellingShingle Ted Gyle Lewis
The Mathematics of Catastrophe
AppliedMath
risk and resilience in complex infrastructure
consequence
exceedance probability
fractal dimension
network simulation models
blocking nodes/links
title The Mathematics of Catastrophe
title_full The Mathematics of Catastrophe
title_fullStr The Mathematics of Catastrophe
title_full_unstemmed The Mathematics of Catastrophe
title_short The Mathematics of Catastrophe
title_sort mathematics of catastrophe
topic risk and resilience in complex infrastructure
consequence
exceedance probability
fractal dimension
network simulation models
blocking nodes/links
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9909/2/3/28
work_keys_str_mv AT tedgylelewis themathematicsofcatastrophe
AT tedgylelewis mathematicsofcatastrophe