Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management

This study performed a steady-state numerical analysis to understand the temperature in different heat sink configurations for LED applications. Seven heat sink configurations named R, H-6, H-8, H-10, C, C3, and C3E3 were considered. Parameters like input power, number of fins, heat sink configurati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramesh Thangamani, Praveen Ayyappan Susila, Pillai Praveen Bhaskaran, Salunkhe Sachin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijsmdo.org/articles/smdo/full_html/2022/01/smdo220024/smdo220024.html
_version_ 1811216074705731584
author Ramesh Thangamani
Praveen Ayyappan Susila
Pillai Praveen Bhaskaran
Salunkhe Sachin
author_facet Ramesh Thangamani
Praveen Ayyappan Susila
Pillai Praveen Bhaskaran
Salunkhe Sachin
author_sort Ramesh Thangamani
collection DOAJ
description This study performed a steady-state numerical analysis to understand the temperature in different heat sink configurations for LED applications. Seven heat sink configurations named R, H-6, H-8, H-10, C, C3, and C3E3 were considered. Parameters like input power, number of fins, heat sink configuration were varied, and their influence on LED temperature distribution, heat sink thermal resistance and thermal interface material temperature were studied. The results showed that the temperature distribution of the H-6 heat sink decreased by 46.30% compared with the Cheat sink for an input power of 16 W. The result of the H-6 heat sink shows that the heat sink thermal resistance was decreased by 73.91% compared with the Cheat sink at 16 W. The lowest interface material temperature of 54.11 °C was achieved by the H-6 heat sink when the input power was used 16 W. The H-6 heat sink exhibited better performance due to more surface area with several fins than other heat sinks.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:33:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-13f91b16a4ee4e0a99ac36560a0d423d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1779-6288
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:33:17Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
spelling doaj.art-13f91b16a4ee4e0a99ac36560a0d423d2022-12-22T03:43:57ZengEDP SciencesInternational Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization1779-62882022-01-01131810.1051/smdo/2022009smdo220024Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal managementRamesh Thangamani0Praveen Ayyappan Susila1Pillai Praveen Bhaskaran2Salunkhe Sachin3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6542-2050Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and TechnologyClean Energy Research Group, Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of PretoriaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and TechnologyThis study performed a steady-state numerical analysis to understand the temperature in different heat sink configurations for LED applications. Seven heat sink configurations named R, H-6, H-8, H-10, C, C3, and C3E3 were considered. Parameters like input power, number of fins, heat sink configuration were varied, and their influence on LED temperature distribution, heat sink thermal resistance and thermal interface material temperature were studied. The results showed that the temperature distribution of the H-6 heat sink decreased by 46.30% compared with the Cheat sink for an input power of 16 W. The result of the H-6 heat sink shows that the heat sink thermal resistance was decreased by 73.91% compared with the Cheat sink at 16 W. The lowest interface material temperature of 54.11 °C was achieved by the H-6 heat sink when the input power was used 16 W. The H-6 heat sink exhibited better performance due to more surface area with several fins than other heat sinks.https://www.ijsmdo.org/articles/smdo/full_html/2022/01/smdo220024/smdo220024.htmlledthermal resistancefeaheat sinkstemperature of interface material
spellingShingle Ramesh Thangamani
Praveen Ayyappan Susila
Pillai Praveen Bhaskaran
Salunkhe Sachin
Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management
International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
led
thermal resistance
fea
heat sinks
temperature of interface material
title Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management
title_full Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management
title_fullStr Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management
title_full_unstemmed Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management
title_short Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management
title_sort numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power led thermal management
topic led
thermal resistance
fea
heat sinks
temperature of interface material
url https://www.ijsmdo.org/articles/smdo/full_html/2022/01/smdo220024/smdo220024.html
work_keys_str_mv AT rameshthangamani numericalsimulationofheatsinkswithdifferentconfigurationsforhighpowerledthermalmanagement
AT praveenayyappansusila numericalsimulationofheatsinkswithdifferentconfigurationsforhighpowerledthermalmanagement
AT pillaipraveenbhaskaran numericalsimulationofheatsinkswithdifferentconfigurationsforhighpowerledthermalmanagement
AT salunkhesachin numericalsimulationofheatsinkswithdifferentconfigurationsforhighpowerledthermalmanagement