The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)

The large-scale appropriation of modernist architectural features in everyday housing projects in postcolonial India is remarkable. This article examines how regional architects adapted their engagement with architectural modernism to the evolving circumstances of architectural production within the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Melsens, Inge Bertels, Amit Srivastava
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institut National d'Histoire de l'Art
Series:ABE Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/abe/7011
_version_ 1797305608195538944
author Sarah Melsens
Inge Bertels
Amit Srivastava
author_facet Sarah Melsens
Inge Bertels
Amit Srivastava
author_sort Sarah Melsens
collection DOAJ
description The large-scale appropriation of modernist architectural features in everyday housing projects in postcolonial India is remarkable. This article examines how regional architects adapted their engagement with architectural modernism to the evolving circumstances of architectural production within the context of the developing world. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s “field theory”, it presents a detailed case study of two decades of residential work by Architects United, a medium-scale architectural practice founded in the Indian city of Pune in 1961. While the architects’ earliest projects demonstrated an opportunity and desire for architectural innovation, this approach became increasingly restricted as new patterns for housing provision emerged, resulting in a more subdued and hybrid form of modernist architecture. The paper makes use of the architects’ previously undisclosed archive and oral history to demonstrate that these architectural adaptations were the indirect result of governance practices and societal change, particularly the government’s stimulation of co-operative housing initiatives and the emergence of a postcolonial middle class with distinct housing expectations. As such, this “peripheral” case exposes some of the processes that have been overlooked in the rhetoric of Architectural Modernism as a Western import in India, which is primarily centered around the discussion of exceptional public building commissions by “global experts” or their Indian disciples. The paper further highlights the need to investigate the processes of architectural production, in addition to the built product itself, so that a pluralistic rather than romanticized understanding of architectural practice may emerge.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T00:28:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-13f9ad413cfb466aa1cdb832576e2dfd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2275-6639
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-08T00:28:24Z
publisher Institut National d'Histoire de l'Art
record_format Article
series ABE Journal
spelling doaj.art-13f9ad413cfb466aa1cdb832576e2dfd2024-02-15T14:00:44ZdeuInstitut National d'Histoire de l'ArtABE Journal2275-66391610.4000/abe.7011The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)Sarah MelsensInge BertelsAmit SrivastavaThe large-scale appropriation of modernist architectural features in everyday housing projects in postcolonial India is remarkable. This article examines how regional architects adapted their engagement with architectural modernism to the evolving circumstances of architectural production within the context of the developing world. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s “field theory”, it presents a detailed case study of two decades of residential work by Architects United, a medium-scale architectural practice founded in the Indian city of Pune in 1961. While the architects’ earliest projects demonstrated an opportunity and desire for architectural innovation, this approach became increasingly restricted as new patterns for housing provision emerged, resulting in a more subdued and hybrid form of modernist architecture. The paper makes use of the architects’ previously undisclosed archive and oral history to demonstrate that these architectural adaptations were the indirect result of governance practices and societal change, particularly the government’s stimulation of co-operative housing initiatives and the emergence of a postcolonial middle class with distinct housing expectations. As such, this “peripheral” case exposes some of the processes that have been overlooked in the rhetoric of Architectural Modernism as a Western import in India, which is primarily centered around the discussion of exceptional public building commissions by “global experts” or their Indian disciples. The paper further highlights the need to investigate the processes of architectural production, in addition to the built product itself, so that a pluralistic rather than romanticized understanding of architectural practice may emerge.https://journals.openedition.org/abe/7011postcolonial architectureThird World Modernismarchitectural practiceco-operative housing
spellingShingle Sarah Melsens
Inge Bertels
Amit Srivastava
The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)
ABE Journal
postcolonial architecture
Third World Modernism
architectural practice
co-operative housing
title The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)
title_full The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)
title_fullStr The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)
title_full_unstemmed The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)
title_short The Architectural Production of India’s Everyday Modernism: Middle-class Housing in Pune, (1960-1980)
title_sort architectural production of india s everyday modernism middle class housing in pune 1960 1980
topic postcolonial architecture
Third World Modernism
architectural practice
co-operative housing
url https://journals.openedition.org/abe/7011
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahmelsens thearchitecturalproductionofindiaseverydaymodernismmiddleclasshousinginpune19601980
AT ingebertels thearchitecturalproductionofindiaseverydaymodernismmiddleclasshousinginpune19601980
AT amitsrivastava thearchitecturalproductionofindiaseverydaymodernismmiddleclasshousinginpune19601980
AT sarahmelsens architecturalproductionofindiaseverydaymodernismmiddleclasshousinginpune19601980
AT ingebertels architecturalproductionofindiaseverydaymodernismmiddleclasshousinginpune19601980
AT amitsrivastava architecturalproductionofindiaseverydaymodernismmiddleclasshousinginpune19601980