Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramic

Abstract An evaluation of the performance of a recently developed formulation of (lead‐free) Sodium‐Bismuth titanate – Barium Titanate (NBT‐BT) piezoceramic is presented through the construction and testing of several immersion transducers based around a new material formulation “Pz12” from CTS Ferr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas R. P. Kelley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:The Journal of Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.12282
_version_ 1797794540346671104
author Thomas R. P. Kelley
author_facet Thomas R. P. Kelley
author_sort Thomas R. P. Kelley
collection DOAJ
description Abstract An evaluation of the performance of a recently developed formulation of (lead‐free) Sodium‐Bismuth titanate – Barium Titanate (NBT‐BT) piezoceramic is presented through the construction and testing of several immersion transducers based around a new material formulation “Pz12” from CTS Ferroperm (Kvistgaard, Denmark). Results are intended to yield insight into the applicability of this lead‐free material for use within industrial, NDT, medical or underwater sectors through the reporting of experimentally realised performance characteristics. Results of several performance tests are reported including: pulse‐echo amplitude, electrical insertion loss, transducer efficiency, power output and transmitting voltage response (TVR). Benchmarking is provided against comparable lead zirconate‐titanate (PZT) based transducers using an industry standard Navy Type 1 (Pz26, CTS Ferroperm). Performance of the Pz12 transducers was found to exceed expectations, although was lower than that of the comparable Pz26 transducers. Pulse‐echo amplitudes indicated a −4.3 dB relative amplitude between lead and lead‐free variants with electrical insertion loss and transmitting voltage response both showing an average −3.1 dB between the Pz12 and Pz26. Electroacoustic conversion efficiencies of up to 52% are reported for the Pz12 transducers compared with a 62% maximum efficiency for the Pz26 variant. Temperature stability is also investigated in the 10–70 ˚C range.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:04:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14149f1adb8846bebd0b64f14f252a6b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2051-3305
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:04:29Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Journal of Engineering
spelling doaj.art-14149f1adb8846bebd0b64f14f252a6b2023-06-27T07:44:34ZengWileyThe Journal of Engineering2051-33052023-06-0120236n/an/a10.1049/tje2.12282Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramicThomas R. P. Kelley0Sensors department Precision Acoustics, Dorchester, DT2 8QH UKAbstract An evaluation of the performance of a recently developed formulation of (lead‐free) Sodium‐Bismuth titanate – Barium Titanate (NBT‐BT) piezoceramic is presented through the construction and testing of several immersion transducers based around a new material formulation “Pz12” from CTS Ferroperm (Kvistgaard, Denmark). Results are intended to yield insight into the applicability of this lead‐free material for use within industrial, NDT, medical or underwater sectors through the reporting of experimentally realised performance characteristics. Results of several performance tests are reported including: pulse‐echo amplitude, electrical insertion loss, transducer efficiency, power output and transmitting voltage response (TVR). Benchmarking is provided against comparable lead zirconate‐titanate (PZT) based transducers using an industry standard Navy Type 1 (Pz26, CTS Ferroperm). Performance of the Pz12 transducers was found to exceed expectations, although was lower than that of the comparable Pz26 transducers. Pulse‐echo amplitudes indicated a −4.3 dB relative amplitude between lead and lead‐free variants with electrical insertion loss and transmitting voltage response both showing an average −3.1 dB between the Pz12 and Pz26. Electroacoustic conversion efficiencies of up to 52% are reported for the Pz12 transducers compared with a 62% maximum efficiency for the Pz26 variant. Temperature stability is also investigated in the 10–70 ˚C range.https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.12282environmental factorslead compoundssensors
spellingShingle Thomas R. P. Kelley
Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramic
The Journal of Engineering
environmental factors
lead compounds
sensors
title Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramic
title_full Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramic
title_fullStr Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramic
title_full_unstemmed Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramic
title_short Lead‐free versus PZT: Acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead‐free NBT‐BT piezoceramic
title_sort lead free versus pzt acoustic characterization of ultrasonic immersion transducers fabricated with lead free nbt bt piezoceramic
topic environmental factors
lead compounds
sensors
url https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.12282
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrpkelley leadfreeversuspztacousticcharacterizationofultrasonicimmersiontransducersfabricatedwithleadfreenbtbtpiezoceramic