The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim. To estimate the trabecular bone score (TBS) for evaluation of fracture probability in order to make decisions about starting osteoporosis treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods. We obtained the bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatiana O. Yalochkina, Zhanna E. Belaya, Tatiana O. Chernova, Natalia I. Sazonova, Natalia V. Tarbaeva, Timur T. Tsoriev, Ludmila Y. Rozhinskaya, Galina A. Mel'nichenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Endocrinology Research Centre 2017-12-01
Series:Ожирение и метаболизм
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.omet-endojournals.ru/jour/article/view/9449
_version_ 1797204582761234432
author Tatiana O. Yalochkina
Zhanna E. Belaya
Tatiana O. Chernova
Natalia I. Sazonova
Natalia V. Tarbaeva
Timur T. Tsoriev
Ludmila Y. Rozhinskaya
Galina A. Mel'nichenko
author_facet Tatiana O. Yalochkina
Zhanna E. Belaya
Tatiana O. Chernova
Natalia I. Sazonova
Natalia V. Tarbaeva
Timur T. Tsoriev
Ludmila Y. Rozhinskaya
Galina A. Mel'nichenko
author_sort Tatiana O. Yalochkina
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To estimate the trabecular bone score (TBS) for evaluation of fracture probability in order to make decisions about starting osteoporosis treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods. We obtained the bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (iDXA) in patients with T2DM (with and without a history of osteoporotic fractures) versus the control group. Before and after TBS measurements we assessed the ten-year probability of fracture using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). Results. We enrolled 48 patients with T2DM, including 17 with a history of low-traumatic fracture, 31 patients without fractures and 29 subjects of a control group. BMD was higher in patients with T2DM compared to the control group at L1–L4 (mean T-score 0.44, 95% CI -3.2 – 4.9 vs mean T-score 0.33, 95% CI -2.9 – 3.0 in a control group p=0.052) and Total Hip (mean T-score 0.51, 95% CI -2.1 – 3.0 vs mean T-score -0.03, 95% CI -1.4 – 1.2 in a control group p=0,025). The TBS and 10-year probability of fracture (FRAX) was not different in patients with T2DM versus the control group. However, when the TBS was entered as an additional risk factor, the 10-year probability of fracture became higher in patients with T2DM (10-year probability of fracture in T2DM- 8.68, 95% CI 0.3-25.0 versus 6.68, 95% CI 0.4–15.0 in control group, p=0.04). Among patients with diabetes with and without fractures the FRAX score was higher in subjects with fractures, but no difference was found in regards to BMD or TBS. Entering BMD and TBS values into the FRAX tool in subjects with diabetes and fractures decreased the FRAX score. However, patients with low-traumatic fractures should be treated for osteoporosis without a BMD, TBS or FRAX assessment. Conclusion. TBS improves the results of FRAX assessment in patients with T2DM and should be entered while evaluating FRAX in patients with T2DM. However, additional research is needed to develop a more sensitive tool to evaluate fracture risk in patients with T2DM.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:12:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-141844330e1341b1ab43465b204ce0f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2071-8713
2306-5524
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:37:31Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Endocrinology Research Centre
record_format Article
series Ожирение и метаболизм
spelling doaj.art-141844330e1341b1ab43465b204ce0f92024-04-16T16:16:11ZengEndocrinology Research CentreОжирение и метаболизм2071-87132306-55242017-12-01144677210.14341/omet2017467-728394The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusTatiana O. Yalochkina0Zhanna E. Belaya1Tatiana O. Chernova2Natalia I. Sazonova3Natalia V. Tarbaeva4Timur T. Tsoriev5Ludmila Y. Rozhinskaya6Galina A. Mel'nichenko7<p>City polyclinic №219</p><p>Endocrinology Research Centre</p><p>Endocrinology Research Centre</p><p>Endocrinology Research Centre</p><p>Endocrinology Research Centre</p><p>Endocrinology Research Centre</p><p>Endocrinology Research Centre</p><p>Endocrinology Research Centre</p>Aim. To estimate the trabecular bone score (TBS) for evaluation of fracture probability in order to make decisions about starting osteoporosis treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods. We obtained the bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (iDXA) in patients with T2DM (with and without a history of osteoporotic fractures) versus the control group. Before and after TBS measurements we assessed the ten-year probability of fracture using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). Results. We enrolled 48 patients with T2DM, including 17 with a history of low-traumatic fracture, 31 patients without fractures and 29 subjects of a control group. BMD was higher in patients with T2DM compared to the control group at L1&ndash;L4 (mean T-score 0.44, 95% CI -3.2 &ndash; 4.9 vs mean T-score 0.33, 95% CI -2.9 &ndash; 3.0 in a control group p=0.052) and Total Hip (mean T-score 0.51, 95% CI -2.1 &ndash; 3.0 vs mean T-score -0.03, 95% CI -1.4 &ndash; 1.2 in a control group p=0,025). The TBS and 10-year probability of fracture (FRAX) was not different in patients with T2DM versus the control group. However, when the TBS was entered as an additional risk factor, the 10-year probability of fracture became higher in patients with T2DM (10-year probability of fracture in T2DM- 8.68, 95% CI 0.3-25.0 versus 6.68, 95% CI 0.4&ndash;15.0 in control group, p=0.04). Among patients with diabetes with and without fractures the FRAX score was higher in subjects with fractures, but no difference was found in regards to BMD or TBS. Entering BMD and TBS values into the FRAX tool in subjects with diabetes and fractures decreased the FRAX score. However, patients with low-traumatic fractures should be treated for osteoporosis without a BMD, TBS or FRAX assessment. Conclusion. TBS improves the results of FRAX assessment in patients with T2DM and should be entered while evaluating FRAX in patients with T2DM. However, additional research is needed to develop a more sensitive tool to evaluate fracture risk in patients with T2DM.https://www.omet-endojournals.ru/jour/article/view/9449diabetes mellitus type 2dual-energy x-ray absorptiometrytrabecular bone scoreosteoporosis
spellingShingle Tatiana O. Yalochkina
Zhanna E. Belaya
Tatiana O. Chernova
Natalia I. Sazonova
Natalia V. Tarbaeva
Timur T. Tsoriev
Ludmila Y. Rozhinskaya
Galina A. Mel'nichenko
The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ожирение и метаболизм
diabetes mellitus type 2
dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
trabecular bone score
osteoporosis
title The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short The assessment of Trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of FRAX in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort assessment of trabecular bone score to improve the sensitivity of frax in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic diabetes mellitus type 2
dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
trabecular bone score
osteoporosis
url https://www.omet-endojournals.ru/jour/article/view/9449
work_keys_str_mv AT tatianaoyalochkina theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT zhannaebelaya theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT tatianaochernova theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT nataliaisazonova theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT nataliavtarbaeva theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT timurttsoriev theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT ludmilayrozhinskaya theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT galinaamelnichenko theassessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT tatianaoyalochkina assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT zhannaebelaya assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT tatianaochernova assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT nataliaisazonova assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT nataliavtarbaeva assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT timurttsoriev assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT ludmilayrozhinskaya assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT galinaamelnichenko assessmentoftrabecularbonescoretoimprovethesensitivityoffraxinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus