Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food Allergy

Introduction . Food allergies affect 8% of the pediatric population in the United States with an estimated annual cost of US$25 billion. The low specificity of some of the main food allergy tests used in diagnosis may generate false positives incurring unnecessary costs. We examined the cost-effecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah Alsaggaf MD, James Murphy MD, Sydney Leibel MD, MPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-11-01
Series:Global Pediatric Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19891298
_version_ 1818302746422411264
author Abdullah Alsaggaf MD
James Murphy MD
Sydney Leibel MD, MPH
author_facet Abdullah Alsaggaf MD
James Murphy MD
Sydney Leibel MD, MPH
author_sort Abdullah Alsaggaf MD
collection DOAJ
description Introduction . Food allergies affect 8% of the pediatric population in the United States with an estimated annual cost of US$25 billion. The low specificity of some of the main food allergy tests used in diagnosis may generate false positives incurring unnecessary costs. We examined the cost-effectiveness of oral food challenges (OFC) as confirmatory tests in the diagnosis of food allergy. Methods . We constructed a decision tree with a Markov model comparing the long-term (15 years) cost and effectiveness—in the form of quality-adjusted life years (QALY)—of confirmatory OFCs compared with immediate allergenic food elimination (FE) after a skin prick test or blood immunoglobulin E (IgE) level in children with suspected food allergy. For costs, we included the costs of OFCs and the reported annual costs of having a food allergy, including direct medical costs and costs borne by families. Results . The cost of OFC strategy was $8671 compared with $18 012 for the FE strategy for the length of the model. Also, the OFC strategy had a total QALY of 21.942 compared with 21.740 for the FE strategy. In the OFC strategy, the total cost was $9341 less than FE and the increase in QALY after OFCs led to a 0.202 higher effectiveness in the OFC strategy. Conclusion . In conclusion, our study shows that the confirmatory OFC strategy dominated the FE strategy and that a confirmatory OFC for children, within a year of diagnosis, is a cost-effective strategy that decreases costs and appears to improve quality of life.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:43:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1426bda872d445bf943930652b655a02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-794X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:43:48Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Global Pediatric Health
spelling doaj.art-1426bda872d445bf943930652b655a022022-12-21T23:57:43ZengSAGE PublishingGlobal Pediatric Health2333-794X2019-11-01610.1177/2333794X19891298Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food AllergyAbdullah Alsaggaf MD0James Murphy MD1Sydney Leibel MD, MPH2University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USAUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USARady Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USAIntroduction . Food allergies affect 8% of the pediatric population in the United States with an estimated annual cost of US$25 billion. The low specificity of some of the main food allergy tests used in diagnosis may generate false positives incurring unnecessary costs. We examined the cost-effectiveness of oral food challenges (OFC) as confirmatory tests in the diagnosis of food allergy. Methods . We constructed a decision tree with a Markov model comparing the long-term (15 years) cost and effectiveness—in the form of quality-adjusted life years (QALY)—of confirmatory OFCs compared with immediate allergenic food elimination (FE) after a skin prick test or blood immunoglobulin E (IgE) level in children with suspected food allergy. For costs, we included the costs of OFCs and the reported annual costs of having a food allergy, including direct medical costs and costs borne by families. Results . The cost of OFC strategy was $8671 compared with $18 012 for the FE strategy for the length of the model. Also, the OFC strategy had a total QALY of 21.942 compared with 21.740 for the FE strategy. In the OFC strategy, the total cost was $9341 less than FE and the increase in QALY after OFCs led to a 0.202 higher effectiveness in the OFC strategy. Conclusion . In conclusion, our study shows that the confirmatory OFC strategy dominated the FE strategy and that a confirmatory OFC for children, within a year of diagnosis, is a cost-effective strategy that decreases costs and appears to improve quality of life.https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19891298
spellingShingle Abdullah Alsaggaf MD
James Murphy MD
Sydney Leibel MD, MPH
Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food Allergy
Global Pediatric Health
title Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food Allergy
title_full Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food Allergy
title_fullStr Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food Allergy
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food Allergy
title_short Estimating Cost-Effectiveness of Confirmatory Oral Food Challenges in the Diagnosis of Children With Food Allergy
title_sort estimating cost effectiveness of confirmatory oral food challenges in the diagnosis of children with food allergy
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19891298
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahalsaggafmd estimatingcosteffectivenessofconfirmatoryoralfoodchallengesinthediagnosisofchildrenwithfoodallergy
AT jamesmurphymd estimatingcosteffectivenessofconfirmatoryoralfoodchallengesinthediagnosisofchildrenwithfoodallergy
AT sydneyleibelmdmph estimatingcosteffectivenessofconfirmatoryoralfoodchallengesinthediagnosisofchildrenwithfoodallergy