Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study

BackgroundConventional clinical trials are essential for generating high-quality evidence by measuring the efficacy of interventions in rigorously controlled clinical environments. However, their execution can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, clinical trials face...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romée Melanie Helena Coert, James Kenneth Timmis, André Boorsma, Wilrike J Pasman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2021/7/e26813
_version_ 1797735849857646592
author Romée Melanie Helena Coert
James Kenneth Timmis
André Boorsma
Wilrike J Pasman
author_facet Romée Melanie Helena Coert
James Kenneth Timmis
André Boorsma
Wilrike J Pasman
author_sort Romée Melanie Helena Coert
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundConventional clinical trials are essential for generating high-quality evidence by measuring the efficacy of interventions in rigorously controlled clinical environments. However, their execution can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, clinical trials face several logistical challenges regarding the identification, recruitment, and retention of participants; consistent data collection during trials; and adequate patient follow-up. This might lead to inefficient resource utilization. In order to partially address the current problems with conventional clinical trials, there exists the need for innovations. One such innovation is the virtual clinical trial (VCT). VCTs allow for the collection and integration of diverse data from multiple information sources, such as electronic health records, clinical and demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, anthropometric and activity measurements, and data collected by digital biomarkers or (small) samples that participants can collect themselves. Although VCTs have the potential to provide substantial value to clinical research and patients because they can lower clinical trial costs, increase the volume of data collected from patients’ daily environment, and reduce the burden of patient participation, so far VCT adoption is not commonplace. ObjectiveThis paper aims to better understand the barriers and facilitators to VCT adoption by determining the factors that influence individuals’ considerations regarding VCTs from the perspective of various stakeholders. MethodsBased on online semistructured interviews, a qualitative study was conducted with pharmaceutical companies, food and health organizations, and an applied research organization in Europe. Data were thematically analyzed using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. ResultsA total of 16 individuals with interest and experience in VCTs were interviewed, including persons from pharmaceutical companies (n=6), food and health organizations (n=4), and a research organization (n=6). Key barriers included a potentially low degree of acceptance by regulatory authorities, technical issues (standardization, validation, and data storage), compliance and adherence, and lack of knowledge or comprehension regarding the opportunities VCTs have to offer. Involvement of regulators in development processes, stakeholder exposure to the results of pilot studies, and clear and simple instructions and assistance for patients were considered key facilitators. ConclusionsCollaboration among all stakeholders in VCT development is crucial to increase knowledge and awareness. Organizations should invest in accurate data collection technologies, and compliance of patients in VCTs needs to be ensured. Multicriteria decision analysis can help determine if a VCT is a preferred option by stakeholders. The findings of this study can be a good starting point to accelerate the development and widespread implementation of VCTs.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:05:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1429ecca42784ed085b5662eac4ad703
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-8871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:05:03Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
spelling doaj.art-1429ecca42784ed085b5662eac4ad7032023-08-28T17:00:41ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712021-07-01237e2681310.2196/26813Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative StudyRomée Melanie Helena Coerthttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-5486James Kenneth Timmishttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-0859André Boorsmahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6740-7022Wilrike J Pasmanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6962-2674 BackgroundConventional clinical trials are essential for generating high-quality evidence by measuring the efficacy of interventions in rigorously controlled clinical environments. However, their execution can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, clinical trials face several logistical challenges regarding the identification, recruitment, and retention of participants; consistent data collection during trials; and adequate patient follow-up. This might lead to inefficient resource utilization. In order to partially address the current problems with conventional clinical trials, there exists the need for innovations. One such innovation is the virtual clinical trial (VCT). VCTs allow for the collection and integration of diverse data from multiple information sources, such as electronic health records, clinical and demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, anthropometric and activity measurements, and data collected by digital biomarkers or (small) samples that participants can collect themselves. Although VCTs have the potential to provide substantial value to clinical research and patients because they can lower clinical trial costs, increase the volume of data collected from patients’ daily environment, and reduce the burden of patient participation, so far VCT adoption is not commonplace. ObjectiveThis paper aims to better understand the barriers and facilitators to VCT adoption by determining the factors that influence individuals’ considerations regarding VCTs from the perspective of various stakeholders. MethodsBased on online semistructured interviews, a qualitative study was conducted with pharmaceutical companies, food and health organizations, and an applied research organization in Europe. Data were thematically analyzed using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. ResultsA total of 16 individuals with interest and experience in VCTs were interviewed, including persons from pharmaceutical companies (n=6), food and health organizations (n=4), and a research organization (n=6). Key barriers included a potentially low degree of acceptance by regulatory authorities, technical issues (standardization, validation, and data storage), compliance and adherence, and lack of knowledge or comprehension regarding the opportunities VCTs have to offer. Involvement of regulators in development processes, stakeholder exposure to the results of pilot studies, and clear and simple instructions and assistance for patients were considered key facilitators. ConclusionsCollaboration among all stakeholders in VCT development is crucial to increase knowledge and awareness. Organizations should invest in accurate data collection technologies, and compliance of patients in VCTs needs to be ensured. Multicriteria decision analysis can help determine if a VCT is a preferred option by stakeholders. The findings of this study can be a good starting point to accelerate the development and widespread implementation of VCTs.https://www.jmir.org/2021/7/e26813
spellingShingle Romée Melanie Helena Coert
James Kenneth Timmis
André Boorsma
Wilrike J Pasman
Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research
title Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study
title_full Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study
title_short Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study
title_sort stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators for the adoption of virtual clinical trials qualitative study
url https://www.jmir.org/2021/7/e26813
work_keys_str_mv AT romeemelaniehelenacoert stakeholderperspectivesonbarriersandfacilitatorsfortheadoptionofvirtualclinicaltrialsqualitativestudy
AT jameskennethtimmis stakeholderperspectivesonbarriersandfacilitatorsfortheadoptionofvirtualclinicaltrialsqualitativestudy
AT andreboorsma stakeholderperspectivesonbarriersandfacilitatorsfortheadoptionofvirtualclinicaltrialsqualitativestudy
AT wilrikejpasman stakeholderperspectivesonbarriersandfacilitatorsfortheadoptionofvirtualclinicaltrialsqualitativestudy