Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade.
Self-reported height and weight data have been used in several studies with the purpose of determining the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Despite being a simple methodology, little information exists about the reliability of these measures, namely, in university students. The objective of thi...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ordem dos Médicos
2004-10-01
|
Series: | Acta Médica Portuguesa |
Online Access: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1113 |
_version_ | 1798021048796446720 |
---|---|
author | Linda Clemente Pedro Moreira Bruno Oliveira Maria Daniel Vaz de Almeida |
author_facet | Linda Clemente Pedro Moreira Bruno Oliveira Maria Daniel Vaz de Almeida |
author_sort | Linda Clemente |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Self-reported height and weight data have been used in several studies with the purpose of determining the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Despite being a simple methodology, little information exists about the reliability of these measures, namely, in university students. The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported body mass index (BMI) to evaluate the prevalence of overweight and obesity in university students.In a convenience sample of 380 university students (226 women and 154 men), weight and height were obtained by self-reported measures and anthropometric assessment according to international standards methodology (objective). BMI was calculated from self-reported and direct measures.The discrepancy between objective and self-reported weight was not significative. For height, this discrepancy was significantly different in women, in men, and between genders. The difference between BMI values was significantly different in women (0.8 +/- 1.1 kg/m2), in men (0.4 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) and between genders. Concerning overweight and obesity, according to the objective BMI, the sensitivity was only 50% in women, and 70% in men, while the specificity was 99% in women and 98% in men.Our results show a poor sensitivity of self-reported weight and height data, to estimate overweight and obesity, thus, this method might not be reliable for studies of prevalence of obesity in this population. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T17:07:42Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-143b4217664446689952cada05c84d97 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0870-399X 1646-0758 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T17:07:42Z |
publishDate | 2004-10-01 |
publisher | Ordem dos Médicos |
record_format | Article |
series | Acta Médica Portuguesa |
spelling | doaj.art-143b4217664446689952cada05c84d972022-12-22T04:12:59ZengOrdem dos MédicosActa Médica Portuguesa0870-399X1646-07582004-10-0117510.20344/amp.1113Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade.Linda Clemente0Pedro MoreiraBruno OliveiraMaria Daniel Vaz de AlmeidaFaculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação, Universidade do Porto, Porto.Self-reported height and weight data have been used in several studies with the purpose of determining the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Despite being a simple methodology, little information exists about the reliability of these measures, namely, in university students. The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported body mass index (BMI) to evaluate the prevalence of overweight and obesity in university students.In a convenience sample of 380 university students (226 women and 154 men), weight and height were obtained by self-reported measures and anthropometric assessment according to international standards methodology (objective). BMI was calculated from self-reported and direct measures.The discrepancy between objective and self-reported weight was not significative. For height, this discrepancy was significantly different in women, in men, and between genders. The difference between BMI values was significantly different in women (0.8 +/- 1.1 kg/m2), in men (0.4 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) and between genders. Concerning overweight and obesity, according to the objective BMI, the sensitivity was only 50% in women, and 70% in men, while the specificity was 99% in women and 98% in men.Our results show a poor sensitivity of self-reported weight and height data, to estimate overweight and obesity, thus, this method might not be reliable for studies of prevalence of obesity in this population.https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1113 |
spellingShingle | Linda Clemente Pedro Moreira Bruno Oliveira Maria Daniel Vaz de Almeida Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade. Acta Médica Portuguesa |
title | Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade. |
title_full | Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade. |
title_fullStr | Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade. |
title_full_unstemmed | Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade. |
title_short | Indice de massa corporal: sensibilidade e especificidade. |
title_sort | indice de massa corporal sensibilidade e especificidade |
url | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindaclemente indicedemassacorporalsensibilidadeeespecificidade AT pedromoreira indicedemassacorporalsensibilidadeeespecificidade AT brunooliveira indicedemassacorporalsensibilidadeeespecificidade AT mariadanielvazdealmeida indicedemassacorporalsensibilidadeeespecificidade |