Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows.
Acoustic monitoring has been tested as an alternative to the traditional, human-based approach of surveying birds, however studies examining the effectiveness of different acoustic methods sometimes yield inconsistent results. In this study we examined whether bird biodiversity estimated by traditio...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266557 |
| _version_ | 1811341762316206080 |
|---|---|
| author | Michał Budka Marek Jobda Paweł Szałański Hubert Piórkowski |
| author_facet | Michał Budka Marek Jobda Paweł Szałański Hubert Piórkowski |
| author_sort | Michał Budka |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Acoustic monitoring has been tested as an alternative to the traditional, human-based approach of surveying birds, however studies examining the effectiveness of different acoustic methods sometimes yield inconsistent results. In this study we examined whether bird biodiversity estimated by traditional surveys of birds differs to that obtained through soundscape surveys in meadow habitats that are of special agricultural importance, and whether acoustic monitoring can deliver reliable indicators of meadows and farmland bird biodiversity. We recorded soundscape and simultaneously surveyed birds by highly skilled human-observers within a fixed (50 m and 100 m) and unlimited radius using the point-count method twice in the breeding season at 74 recording sites located in meadows, in order to compare differences in (1) bird biodiversity estimation of meadow, farmland, songbird, and all bird species and (2) the detection rate of single bird species by these two methods. We found that recorders detected more species in comparison to the human-observers who surveyed birds within a fixed radius (50 and 100 m) and fewer when detection distance for human-observers was unlimited. We did not find significant differences in the number of meadow and farmland bird species detected by recorders and observers within a 100 m radius-the most often used fixed radius in traditional human based point-counts. We also showed how detection rate of 48 the most common bird species in our study differ between these two methods. Our study showed that an acoustic survey is equally effective as human observers surveying birds within a 100 m radius in estimation of farmland and meadow bird biodiversity. These groups of species are important for agricultural landscape and commonly used as indicators of habitat quality and its changes. Even though recorders rarely detect species that remain mostly silent during the observation periods, or species that are further distant than 100 m away, we recommend using acoustic soundscape recording methods as an equally effective and more easily standardised alternative for monitoring of farmland and meadow bird biodiversity. We propose adaptation of acoustic approach to long-term, large-scale monitoring by collecting acoustic data by non-specialists, including landowners and volunteers, and analysing them in a standardised way by units supervising monitoring of agriculture landscape. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T18:58:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-14472386eb6848bfa1dc186d8b6abbd2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T18:58:52Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-14472386eb6848bfa1dc186d8b6abbd22022-12-22T02:34:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01174e026655710.1371/journal.pone.0266557Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows.Michał BudkaMarek JobdaPaweł SzałańskiHubert PiórkowskiAcoustic monitoring has been tested as an alternative to the traditional, human-based approach of surveying birds, however studies examining the effectiveness of different acoustic methods sometimes yield inconsistent results. In this study we examined whether bird biodiversity estimated by traditional surveys of birds differs to that obtained through soundscape surveys in meadow habitats that are of special agricultural importance, and whether acoustic monitoring can deliver reliable indicators of meadows and farmland bird biodiversity. We recorded soundscape and simultaneously surveyed birds by highly skilled human-observers within a fixed (50 m and 100 m) and unlimited radius using the point-count method twice in the breeding season at 74 recording sites located in meadows, in order to compare differences in (1) bird biodiversity estimation of meadow, farmland, songbird, and all bird species and (2) the detection rate of single bird species by these two methods. We found that recorders detected more species in comparison to the human-observers who surveyed birds within a fixed radius (50 and 100 m) and fewer when detection distance for human-observers was unlimited. We did not find significant differences in the number of meadow and farmland bird species detected by recorders and observers within a 100 m radius-the most often used fixed radius in traditional human based point-counts. We also showed how detection rate of 48 the most common bird species in our study differ between these two methods. Our study showed that an acoustic survey is equally effective as human observers surveying birds within a 100 m radius in estimation of farmland and meadow bird biodiversity. These groups of species are important for agricultural landscape and commonly used as indicators of habitat quality and its changes. Even though recorders rarely detect species that remain mostly silent during the observation periods, or species that are further distant than 100 m away, we recommend using acoustic soundscape recording methods as an equally effective and more easily standardised alternative for monitoring of farmland and meadow bird biodiversity. We propose adaptation of acoustic approach to long-term, large-scale monitoring by collecting acoustic data by non-specialists, including landowners and volunteers, and analysing them in a standardised way by units supervising monitoring of agriculture landscape.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266557 |
| spellingShingle | Michał Budka Marek Jobda Paweł Szałański Hubert Piórkowski Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows. PLoS ONE |
| title | Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows. |
| title_full | Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows. |
| title_fullStr | Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows. |
| title_short | Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows. |
| title_sort | acoustic approach as an alternative to human based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266557 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michałbudka acousticapproachasanalternativetohumanbasedsurveyinbirdbiodiversitymonitoringinagriculturalmeadows AT marekjobda acousticapproachasanalternativetohumanbasedsurveyinbirdbiodiversitymonitoringinagriculturalmeadows AT pawełszałanski acousticapproachasanalternativetohumanbasedsurveyinbirdbiodiversitymonitoringinagriculturalmeadows AT hubertpiorkowski acousticapproachasanalternativetohumanbasedsurveyinbirdbiodiversitymonitoringinagriculturalmeadows |