Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroom

Recently, outdoor particulate matters have become a serious problem in Korea. Pollutants exhausted from industrial plants and dust transported from adjacent regions contribute to the peaks in fine particle concentration. Indoor air quality is affected by ambient air pollution. Common methods for mai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hatta Muhammad, Han Hwataik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/37/e3sconf_clima2019_06065.pdf
_version_ 1818606291974619136
author Hatta Muhammad
Han Hwataik
author_facet Hatta Muhammad
Han Hwataik
author_sort Hatta Muhammad
collection DOAJ
description Recently, outdoor particulate matters have become a serious problem in Korea. Pollutants exhausted from industrial plants and dust transported from adjacent regions contribute to the peaks in fine particle concentration. Indoor air quality is affected by ambient air pollution. Common methods for maintaining good IAQ from harmful outdoor particles are either through the usage of an air purifier (AP) or to install a filter in the heat recovery ventilator (HRV) system. It is important to evaluate the PM10 concentrations in a room using APs and HRVs depending on various system parameters, such as building air-tightness, indoor generation characteristics, and system filter efficiency. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of AP with that of HRV in reducing PM10 levels in a classroom based on computer simulation. Results show that the filter efficiency of HRV should be increased to over 0.8 under the reference condition in order for the HRV to be compatible with the AP. Increasing the airflow rate of HRV is not an effective way of increasing its filter performance to outperform an AP. We found that HRV performs better as compared to AP in an indoor environment under dusty conditions with the generation rate of over seven times compared to the reference condition.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:08:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14486d7df74947409cb0b1a404b3bfa2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:08:32Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-14486d7df74947409cb0b1a404b3bfa22022-12-21T22:28:51ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-011110606510.1051/e3sconf/201911106065e3sconf_clima2019_06065Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroomHatta Muhammad0Han Hwataik1Graduate School, Kookmin UniversityDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Kookmin UniversityRecently, outdoor particulate matters have become a serious problem in Korea. Pollutants exhausted from industrial plants and dust transported from adjacent regions contribute to the peaks in fine particle concentration. Indoor air quality is affected by ambient air pollution. Common methods for maintaining good IAQ from harmful outdoor particles are either through the usage of an air purifier (AP) or to install a filter in the heat recovery ventilator (HRV) system. It is important to evaluate the PM10 concentrations in a room using APs and HRVs depending on various system parameters, such as building air-tightness, indoor generation characteristics, and system filter efficiency. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of AP with that of HRV in reducing PM10 levels in a classroom based on computer simulation. Results show that the filter efficiency of HRV should be increased to over 0.8 under the reference condition in order for the HRV to be compatible with the AP. Increasing the airflow rate of HRV is not an effective way of increasing its filter performance to outperform an AP. We found that HRV performs better as compared to AP in an indoor environment under dusty conditions with the generation rate of over seven times compared to the reference condition.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/37/e3sconf_clima2019_06065.pdf
spellingShingle Hatta Muhammad
Han Hwataik
Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroom
E3S Web of Conferences
title Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroom
title_full Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroom
title_fullStr Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroom
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroom
title_short Comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor PM10 concentrations in a classroom
title_sort comparison of performance of heat recovery ventilator and air purifier in reducing indoor pm10 concentrations in a classroom
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/37/e3sconf_clima2019_06065.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hattamuhammad comparisonofperformanceofheatrecoveryventilatorandairpurifierinreducingindoorpm10concentrationsinaclassroom
AT hanhwataik comparisonofperformanceofheatrecoveryventilatorandairpurifierinreducingindoorpm10concentrationsinaclassroom