Contrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods study

Abstract Background Due to the recurrent nature of low back pain (LBP), the traditional concepts of cure and recovery are challenged, and investigating the course rather than status at fixed time-points may help us understand prognosis as well as treatment effect. However, methods of frequent measur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lise Hestbaek, Cornelius Myburgh, Henrik Hein Lauridsen, Eleanor Boyle, Alice Kongsted
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12998-018-0222-y
_version_ 1818337992114176000
author Lise Hestbaek
Cornelius Myburgh
Henrik Hein Lauridsen
Eleanor Boyle
Alice Kongsted
author_facet Lise Hestbaek
Cornelius Myburgh
Henrik Hein Lauridsen
Eleanor Boyle
Alice Kongsted
author_sort Lise Hestbaek
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Due to the recurrent nature of low back pain (LBP), the traditional concepts of cure and recovery are challenged, and investigating the course rather than status at fixed time-points may help us understand prognosis as well as treatment effect. However, methods of frequent measuring still need development and validation. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the agreement between continuous, quantitative self-assessment (weekly SMS) of the course of LBP over a one-year period and qualitatively derived retrospective patient self-appraisal of the same time-period. Methods Participants were 32 subjects with LBP from primary care. The quantitative measures consisted of weekly SMS questions for one-year about pain intensity, days with LBP, and activity limitations for that week. For each subject, the weekly responses were graphed and categorized into categories based on intensity, variation and overall change patterns. Qualitative measures were based on semi-structured telephone interviews one-year after a consultation for LBP, where two coders independently categorized the self-appraisal of LBP course into the same predefined categories as the SMS-based trajectories. Furthermore, patients’ perceived overall recovery was related to variation patterns from SMS track. Results There was perfect agreement for 48% in the pain intensity domain, 53% in the variation domain and 63% in the change pattern domain. Most of the discordant cases were classified in neighboring categories with the majority relating to fluctuating patterns. The self-perceived overall recovery status seemed to be reflected quite well by the quantitative measures of pain intensity and days with pain in this study. Conclusion This study shows that a real time quantitative measure (weekly SMS) and the patient’s retrospective appraisal do not fundamentally differ in their reflection of the one-year course of LBP. As a first investigation into this area, these results are promising, as longitudinal quantitatively derived trajectories of LBP seem to reflect the lived experience of the patient to a large degree. Furthermore, the patient’s ability to retrospectively recall their one-year course of LBP appears to be quite good. Future studies should focus on refining the categories of trajectories.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:04:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1458aca110884c3d9147b0f447f084a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:04:01Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
spelling doaj.art-1458aca110884c3d9147b0f447f084a82022-12-21T23:41:03ZengBMCChiropractic & Manual Therapies2045-709X2019-02-0127111010.1186/s12998-018-0222-yContrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods studyLise Hestbaek0Cornelius Myburgh1Henrik Hein Lauridsen2Eleanor Boyle3Alice Kongsted4Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern DenmarkAbstract Background Due to the recurrent nature of low back pain (LBP), the traditional concepts of cure and recovery are challenged, and investigating the course rather than status at fixed time-points may help us understand prognosis as well as treatment effect. However, methods of frequent measuring still need development and validation. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the agreement between continuous, quantitative self-assessment (weekly SMS) of the course of LBP over a one-year period and qualitatively derived retrospective patient self-appraisal of the same time-period. Methods Participants were 32 subjects with LBP from primary care. The quantitative measures consisted of weekly SMS questions for one-year about pain intensity, days with LBP, and activity limitations for that week. For each subject, the weekly responses were graphed and categorized into categories based on intensity, variation and overall change patterns. Qualitative measures were based on semi-structured telephone interviews one-year after a consultation for LBP, where two coders independently categorized the self-appraisal of LBP course into the same predefined categories as the SMS-based trajectories. Furthermore, patients’ perceived overall recovery was related to variation patterns from SMS track. Results There was perfect agreement for 48% in the pain intensity domain, 53% in the variation domain and 63% in the change pattern domain. Most of the discordant cases were classified in neighboring categories with the majority relating to fluctuating patterns. The self-perceived overall recovery status seemed to be reflected quite well by the quantitative measures of pain intensity and days with pain in this study. Conclusion This study shows that a real time quantitative measure (weekly SMS) and the patient’s retrospective appraisal do not fundamentally differ in their reflection of the one-year course of LBP. As a first investigation into this area, these results are promising, as longitudinal quantitatively derived trajectories of LBP seem to reflect the lived experience of the patient to a large degree. Furthermore, the patient’s ability to retrospectively recall their one-year course of LBP appears to be quite good. Future studies should focus on refining the categories of trajectories.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12998-018-0222-yBack painCourseTrajectoriesRecallMixed methodsSMS
spellingShingle Lise Hestbaek
Cornelius Myburgh
Henrik Hein Lauridsen
Eleanor Boyle
Alice Kongsted
Contrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods study
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Back pain
Course
Trajectories
Recall
Mixed methods
SMS
title Contrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods study
title_full Contrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Contrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods study
title_short Contrasting real time quantitative measures (weekly SMS) to patients’ retrospective appraisal of their one-year’s course of low back pain; a probing mixed-methods study
title_sort contrasting real time quantitative measures weekly sms to patients retrospective appraisal of their one year s course of low back pain a probing mixed methods study
topic Back pain
Course
Trajectories
Recall
Mixed methods
SMS
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12998-018-0222-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lisehestbaek contrastingrealtimequantitativemeasuresweeklysmstopatientsretrospectiveappraisaloftheironeyearscourseoflowbackpainaprobingmixedmethodsstudy
AT corneliusmyburgh contrastingrealtimequantitativemeasuresweeklysmstopatientsretrospectiveappraisaloftheironeyearscourseoflowbackpainaprobingmixedmethodsstudy
AT henrikheinlauridsen contrastingrealtimequantitativemeasuresweeklysmstopatientsretrospectiveappraisaloftheironeyearscourseoflowbackpainaprobingmixedmethodsstudy
AT eleanorboyle contrastingrealtimequantitativemeasuresweeklysmstopatientsretrospectiveappraisaloftheironeyearscourseoflowbackpainaprobingmixedmethodsstudy
AT alicekongsted contrastingrealtimequantitativemeasuresweeklysmstopatientsretrospectiveappraisaloftheironeyearscourseoflowbackpainaprobingmixedmethodsstudy