Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ Motivation

Becoming committed to a new health-related goal and pursuing it is difficult for many people. The present study (a) developed and tested the psychometric properties of a brief Goal Ambivalence Scale (GAS) in a sample of dieters and (b) tested the effectiveness of providing dieters with feedback on t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Javad S. Fadardi, Samiyeh Borhani, W. Miles Cox, Alan W. Stacy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Behavioral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/12/11/441
_version_ 1797469042174328832
author Javad S. Fadardi
Samiyeh Borhani
W. Miles Cox
Alan W. Stacy
author_facet Javad S. Fadardi
Samiyeh Borhani
W. Miles Cox
Alan W. Stacy
author_sort Javad S. Fadardi
collection DOAJ
description Becoming committed to a new health-related goal and pursuing it is difficult for many people. The present study (a) developed and tested the psychometric properties of a brief Goal Ambivalence Scale (GAS) in a sample of dieters and (b) tested the effectiveness of providing dieters with feedback on their scores on the GAS. In Study 1, dieters (<i>n</i> = 334, 74% females) completed the GAS and a measure of Health-Related Concerns and Actions (HRCA). The standardization of the GAS was supported by CVR and CVI, the results of a PCA, and strong reliability and validity statistics. In Study 2, the experimental group of dieters (<i>n</i> = 107; 67.50% female) received feedback on their GAS scores, but the control group did not (<i>n</i> = 111; 62.30% female). Compared with the control group, the experimental group reported a greater need for information, greater readiness to change, and higher perceived situational confidence in resisting food that was inconsistent with their dieting goals. To conclude, the GAS could be used in health settings to provide clients and providers with an objective, fast measure of commitment to achieving health-related goals. Moreover, immediate feedback on health-related goals may improve change motivation.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:15:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-14610cc9ee3342359629222aa8684472
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-328X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:15:50Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Behavioral Sciences
spelling doaj.art-14610cc9ee3342359629222aa86844722023-11-24T03:45:51ZengMDPI AGBehavioral Sciences2076-328X2022-11-01121144110.3390/bs12110441Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ MotivationJavad S. Fadardi0Samiyeh Borhani1W. Miles Cox2Alan W. Stacy3School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USAFaculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948991, IranSchool of Human and Behavioral Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, UKSchool of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USABecoming committed to a new health-related goal and pursuing it is difficult for many people. The present study (a) developed and tested the psychometric properties of a brief Goal Ambivalence Scale (GAS) in a sample of dieters and (b) tested the effectiveness of providing dieters with feedback on their scores on the GAS. In Study 1, dieters (<i>n</i> = 334, 74% females) completed the GAS and a measure of Health-Related Concerns and Actions (HRCA). The standardization of the GAS was supported by CVR and CVI, the results of a PCA, and strong reliability and validity statistics. In Study 2, the experimental group of dieters (<i>n</i> = 107; 67.50% female) received feedback on their GAS scores, but the control group did not (<i>n</i> = 111; 62.30% female). Compared with the control group, the experimental group reported a greater need for information, greater readiness to change, and higher perceived situational confidence in resisting food that was inconsistent with their dieting goals. To conclude, the GAS could be used in health settings to provide clients and providers with an objective, fast measure of commitment to achieving health-related goals. Moreover, immediate feedback on health-related goals may improve change motivation.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/12/11/441health behavior changechange motivationtreatment adherencegoal ambivalencediet
spellingShingle Javad S. Fadardi
Samiyeh Borhani
W. Miles Cox
Alan W. Stacy
Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ Motivation
Behavioral Sciences
health behavior change
change motivation
treatment adherence
goal ambivalence
diet
title Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ Motivation
title_full Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ Motivation
title_fullStr Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ Motivation
title_full_unstemmed Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ Motivation
title_short Do I Really Want to Change? The Effectiveness of Goal Ambivalence Feedback on Dieters’ Motivation
title_sort do i really want to change the effectiveness of goal ambivalence feedback on dieters motivation
topic health behavior change
change motivation
treatment adherence
goal ambivalence
diet
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/12/11/441
work_keys_str_mv AT javadsfadardi doireallywanttochangetheeffectivenessofgoalambivalencefeedbackondietersmotivation
AT samiyehborhani doireallywanttochangetheeffectivenessofgoalambivalencefeedbackondietersmotivation
AT wmilescox doireallywanttochangetheeffectivenessofgoalambivalencefeedbackondietersmotivation
AT alanwstacy doireallywanttochangetheeffectivenessofgoalambivalencefeedbackondietersmotivation