Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures

Background and purpose: Femoral neck fracture is associated with a high rate of side effects, especially in young people, who are usually affected by severe energy shocks. Results after injury depend on some factors, including displacement, fragility, bleeding rate, proper placement, and stable and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abed Shokri, Masoud Bahrami Feraydoni, Rahmatolah Jokar, Soraya Khafri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-15426-en.html
_version_ 1797944054898491392
author Abed Shokri
Masoud Bahrami Feraydoni
Rahmatolah Jokar
Soraya Khafri
author_facet Abed Shokri
Masoud Bahrami Feraydoni
Rahmatolah Jokar
Soraya Khafri
author_sort Abed Shokri
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: Femoral neck fracture is associated with a high rate of side effects, especially in young people, who are usually affected by severe energy shocks. Results after injury depend on some factors, including displacement, fragility, bleeding rate, proper placement, and stable and strong fixation. The aim of this study was to compare dynamic hip screw (DHS) or multiple cannulated screws (MCS) in fractures of the femoral neck base. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 78 patients with femoral neck fracture were treated by internal fixation: MCS (n= 26) and DHS (n= 52) in Babol Shahid Beheshti Hospital, 2016-2018. Complications, including pain and lameness, infection, avascular necrosis (AVN), and nonunion were investigated in both groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) score and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were also compared between the two groups. Results: Mean ages of the patients in MCS group and DHS group were 54.19 ± 23.35 and 58.50 ± 21.06 years, respectively. In patients treated by MCS, infection, AVN, no welding, and pain and lameness were seen in 3, 2, 3, and 6 patients, respectively, while these complication were observed in 1, 1, 1, and 4 patients in the DHS group, respectively. The rate of complications were not found to be significantly different between the two group (P>0.05). The mean VAS score was significantly lower in the DHS group compared to that in the MCS group (P<0.05). The HHS scores were not significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: According to this study, MCS is more appropriate in the treatment of femoral neck fractures due to less bleeding and shorter operation time.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:33:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1468a17da36044f3bcab2c2cd2a47c07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-9260
1735-9279
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:33:34Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1468a17da36044f3bcab2c2cd2a47c072023-01-25T05:00:42ZengMazandaran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences1735-92601735-92792020-07-01301878494Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck FracturesAbed Shokri0Masoud Bahrami Feraydoni1Rahmatolah Jokar2Soraya Khafri3 Resident in Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Background and purpose: Femoral neck fracture is associated with a high rate of side effects, especially in young people, who are usually affected by severe energy shocks. Results after injury depend on some factors, including displacement, fragility, bleeding rate, proper placement, and stable and strong fixation. The aim of this study was to compare dynamic hip screw (DHS) or multiple cannulated screws (MCS) in fractures of the femoral neck base. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 78 patients with femoral neck fracture were treated by internal fixation: MCS (n= 26) and DHS (n= 52) in Babol Shahid Beheshti Hospital, 2016-2018. Complications, including pain and lameness, infection, avascular necrosis (AVN), and nonunion were investigated in both groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) score and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were also compared between the two groups. Results: Mean ages of the patients in MCS group and DHS group were 54.19 ± 23.35 and 58.50 ± 21.06 years, respectively. In patients treated by MCS, infection, AVN, no welding, and pain and lameness were seen in 3, 2, 3, and 6 patients, respectively, while these complication were observed in 1, 1, 1, and 4 patients in the DHS group, respectively. The rate of complications were not found to be significantly different between the two group (P>0.05). The mean VAS score was significantly lower in the DHS group compared to that in the MCS group (P<0.05). The HHS scores were not significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: According to this study, MCS is more appropriate in the treatment of femoral neck fractures due to less bleeding and shorter operation time.http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-15426-en.htmlfemoral neck fractureinternal fixatorsurgical complicationsvisual analogue scaleharris hip score
spellingShingle Abed Shokri
Masoud Bahrami Feraydoni
Rahmatolah Jokar
Soraya Khafri
Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures
Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
femoral neck fracture
internal fixator
surgical complications
visual analogue scale
harris hip score
title Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures
title_fullStr Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures
title_short Comparing Therapeutic Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screw and Multiple Cannulated Screws as Internal Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures
title_sort comparing therapeutic outcomes of dynamic hip screw and multiple cannulated screws as internal fixation in femoral neck fractures
topic femoral neck fracture
internal fixator
surgical complications
visual analogue scale
harris hip score
url http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-15426-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT abedshokri comparingtherapeuticoutcomesofdynamichipscrewandmultiplecannulatedscrewsasinternalfixationinfemoralneckfractures
AT masoudbahramiferaydoni comparingtherapeuticoutcomesofdynamichipscrewandmultiplecannulatedscrewsasinternalfixationinfemoralneckfractures
AT rahmatolahjokar comparingtherapeuticoutcomesofdynamichipscrewandmultiplecannulatedscrewsasinternalfixationinfemoralneckfractures
AT sorayakhafri comparingtherapeuticoutcomesofdynamichipscrewandmultiplecannulatedscrewsasinternalfixationinfemoralneckfractures