Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding

Despite the predominant focus on visual perception in most studies, the role of humans’ sense of smell in navigation has often been neglected. Recent research, however, could show that humans are indeed able to use their sense of smell for orientation, particularly when processed implicitly. In this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mira Schwarz, Kai Hamburger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285034/full
_version_ 1827762280410906624
author Mira Schwarz
Kai Hamburger
author_facet Mira Schwarz
Kai Hamburger
author_sort Mira Schwarz
collection DOAJ
description Despite the predominant focus on visual perception in most studies, the role of humans’ sense of smell in navigation has often been neglected. Recent research, however, could show that humans are indeed able to use their sense of smell for orientation, particularly when processed implicitly. In this study, we investigate whether implicit perception of olfactory landmarks enhanced wayfinding performance compared to explicit perception. Fifty-two people completed a wayfinding and a recognition task in a virtual maze at two times of testing 1 month apart. Participants either received olfactory, visual, or both cues at the intersections. Wayfinding performance was better for olfactory landmarks, which were not correctly remembered in the recognition task. In contrast, wayfinding performance was better when visual landmarks were correctly remembered. In the multimodal condition, wayfinding performance was better with landmarks being remembered at t1 and remained the same at t2. Our results suggest distinct implicit processing mechanisms within the olfactory system and therefore hold important implications for the nature of spatial odor processing extending beyond explicit odor localization tasks. The study highlights the importance for future studies to develop and employ further experimental methods that capture implicit processing across all of our senses. This is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of consciousness, as olfaction strongly influences our behavior, but remains largely latent unless deliberately honed through practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:28:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-146bd79ec4e24186b758241ab0e18d8c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:28:19Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-146bd79ec4e24186b758241ab0e18d8c2023-11-15T07:17:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-11-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.12850341285034Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfindingMira SchwarzKai HamburgerDespite the predominant focus on visual perception in most studies, the role of humans’ sense of smell in navigation has often been neglected. Recent research, however, could show that humans are indeed able to use their sense of smell for orientation, particularly when processed implicitly. In this study, we investigate whether implicit perception of olfactory landmarks enhanced wayfinding performance compared to explicit perception. Fifty-two people completed a wayfinding and a recognition task in a virtual maze at two times of testing 1 month apart. Participants either received olfactory, visual, or both cues at the intersections. Wayfinding performance was better for olfactory landmarks, which were not correctly remembered in the recognition task. In contrast, wayfinding performance was better when visual landmarks were correctly remembered. In the multimodal condition, wayfinding performance was better with landmarks being remembered at t1 and remained the same at t2. Our results suggest distinct implicit processing mechanisms within the olfactory system and therefore hold important implications for the nature of spatial odor processing extending beyond explicit odor localization tasks. The study highlights the importance for future studies to develop and employ further experimental methods that capture implicit processing across all of our senses. This is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of consciousness, as olfaction strongly influences our behavior, but remains largely latent unless deliberately honed through practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285034/fullwayfindingrecognitionimplicit processingolfactionspatial cognition
spellingShingle Mira Schwarz
Kai Hamburger
Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding
Frontiers in Psychology
wayfinding
recognition
implicit processing
olfaction
spatial cognition
title Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding
title_full Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding
title_fullStr Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding
title_full_unstemmed Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding
title_short Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding
title_sort implicit versus explicit processing of visual olfactory and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding
topic wayfinding
recognition
implicit processing
olfaction
spatial cognition
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285034/full
work_keys_str_mv AT miraschwarz implicitversusexplicitprocessingofvisualolfactoryandmultimodallandmarkinformationinhumanwayfinding
AT kaihamburger implicitversusexplicitprocessingofvisualolfactoryandmultimodallandmarkinformationinhumanwayfinding