Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data

An individual tagging model was implemented within the spatial, seasonal, multi-stock, multi-fleet operating models of the peer-reviewed Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) framework for Atlantic bluefin tuna to evaluate the benefits of a harvest strategy that utilizes conventional gene tagging. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas R. Carruthers, Quang C. Huynh, Matthew V. Lauretta, Ann L. Preece, Douglas S. Butterworth, Adrian R. Hordyk, Nathan G. Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1210182/full
_version_ 1797749015881711616
author Thomas R. Carruthers
Quang C. Huynh
Matthew V. Lauretta
Ann L. Preece
Douglas S. Butterworth
Adrian R. Hordyk
Nathan G. Taylor
author_facet Thomas R. Carruthers
Quang C. Huynh
Matthew V. Lauretta
Ann L. Preece
Douglas S. Butterworth
Adrian R. Hordyk
Nathan G. Taylor
author_sort Thomas R. Carruthers
collection DOAJ
description An individual tagging model was implemented within the spatial, seasonal, multi-stock, multi-fleet operating models of the peer-reviewed Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) framework for Atlantic bluefin tuna to evaluate the benefits of a harvest strategy that utilizes conventional gene tagging. A multi-year Brownie estimator was developed to test the accuracy and precision of exploitation rate estimates arising from gene tagging programs with various scenarios for spatial release distribution, release numbers and fishery exploitation rates. Harvest strategies that used the Brownie estimator were tested to evaluate yield and resource conservation performance relative to idealized management using perfect information. For the eastern stock, releasing 1,000 fish throughout the Atlantic and genotyping 27% of all landed fish at an estimated cost of US$2M was sufficient to obtain estimates of exploitation rate with a coefficient of variation of 20%. For the western stock, the same precision in exploitation rate estimates required the release of 1,300 fish and genotyping rate of 35% at an estimated cost of US$2.5M. Harvest strategies using the gene tagging data provided expected yield and resource conservation performance that was not substantially lower than a harvest strategy assuming using perfect information regarding vulnerable biomass. Reducing the number of releases most strongly affected the worst-case ‘lower-tail’ outcomes for West area yield and eastern stock biomass. Conventional gene tagging harvest strategies offer a promising basis for calculating management advice for Atlantic bluefin tuna that may be cheaper, simpler, and more robust than the current conventional stock assessment paradigm.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:13:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-148815a93c9643b28e9b328ade3956c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:13:07Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-148815a93c9643b28e9b328ade3956c22023-08-09T08:24:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452023-08-011010.3389/fmars.2023.12101821210182Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging dataThomas R. Carruthers0Quang C. Huynh1Matthew V. Lauretta2Ann L. Preece3Douglas S. Butterworth4Adrian R. Hordyk5Nathan G. Taylor6Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaBlue Matter Science Ltd., Vancouver, BC, CanadaSustainable Fisheries Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Washington DC, United StatesPelagic Population Dynamics and MSE Team, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT, AustraliaMarine Resource Assessment and Management Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaBlue Matter Science Ltd., Vancouver, BC, CanadaScience Department, International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, Madrid, SpainAn individual tagging model was implemented within the spatial, seasonal, multi-stock, multi-fleet operating models of the peer-reviewed Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) framework for Atlantic bluefin tuna to evaluate the benefits of a harvest strategy that utilizes conventional gene tagging. A multi-year Brownie estimator was developed to test the accuracy and precision of exploitation rate estimates arising from gene tagging programs with various scenarios for spatial release distribution, release numbers and fishery exploitation rates. Harvest strategies that used the Brownie estimator were tested to evaluate yield and resource conservation performance relative to idealized management using perfect information. For the eastern stock, releasing 1,000 fish throughout the Atlantic and genotyping 27% of all landed fish at an estimated cost of US$2M was sufficient to obtain estimates of exploitation rate with a coefficient of variation of 20%. For the western stock, the same precision in exploitation rate estimates required the release of 1,300 fish and genotyping rate of 35% at an estimated cost of US$2.5M. Harvest strategies using the gene tagging data provided expected yield and resource conservation performance that was not substantially lower than a harvest strategy assuming using perfect information regarding vulnerable biomass. Reducing the number of releases most strongly affected the worst-case ‘lower-tail’ outcomes for West area yield and eastern stock biomass. Conventional gene tagging harvest strategies offer a promising basis for calculating management advice for Atlantic bluefin tuna that may be cheaper, simpler, and more robust than the current conventional stock assessment paradigm.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1210182/fullmark-recapturegeneticsharvest strategyestimatormanagement strategy evaluationmanagement procedure
spellingShingle Thomas R. Carruthers
Quang C. Huynh
Matthew V. Lauretta
Ann L. Preece
Douglas S. Butterworth
Adrian R. Hordyk
Nathan G. Taylor
Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data
Frontiers in Marine Science
mark-recapture
genetics
harvest strategy
estimator
management strategy evaluation
management procedure
title Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data
title_full Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data
title_fullStr Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data
title_short Evaluating Atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data
title_sort evaluating atlantic bluefin tuna harvest strategies that use conventional genetic tagging data
topic mark-recapture
genetics
harvest strategy
estimator
management strategy evaluation
management procedure
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1210182/full
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrcarruthers evaluatingatlanticbluefintunaharveststrategiesthatuseconventionalgenetictaggingdata
AT quangchuynh evaluatingatlanticbluefintunaharveststrategiesthatuseconventionalgenetictaggingdata
AT matthewvlauretta evaluatingatlanticbluefintunaharveststrategiesthatuseconventionalgenetictaggingdata
AT annlpreece evaluatingatlanticbluefintunaharveststrategiesthatuseconventionalgenetictaggingdata
AT douglassbutterworth evaluatingatlanticbluefintunaharveststrategiesthatuseconventionalgenetictaggingdata
AT adrianrhordyk evaluatingatlanticbluefintunaharveststrategiesthatuseconventionalgenetictaggingdata
AT nathangtaylor evaluatingatlanticbluefintunaharveststrategiesthatuseconventionalgenetictaggingdata